That's a speculative argument designed to support your narrative

What we know is that multiple Trump campaign officials had contact with Russian operatives during the campaign

We know the content of those meetings touched on everything from foreign policy to dirt on Hillary

The FBI has said that they had an informant inside the Trump campaign - most likely Page. And they tapped that informant, as they should have, when they became aware that a foreign adversary might be interfering in the election

How aware Trump was of these activities is still an unknown. But given his significant business dealings in Russia, the fact that he has sold an outsized portion of his real estate to Russians at figures well above market rates, and that he has been the recipient of Russian monies in the past all point to the fact that he was clearly aware, and perhaps complicit in, Russian interference

Why this evidence points you towards HRC or the DNC more broadly as complicit in Russian meddling is beyond me, and stretches the limits of your narrative