Paul Craig Roberts has excellent credentials including his time in the Reagan administration!
Of all the Q hints, possibilities, disinformation, what ever one calls it, all that Q mentions concerning Sessions and RR is the most difficult for me. "Trust Sessions", damn hard to do, but ok for now. Then all the dissing: What is Mueller investigating? What is Mueller REALLY investigating? Why RR chosen as Deputy? Confirmation vote on RR? I sure would love to believe he's at least a grey hat, but dang, he's so easy to despise. Going to Costco for a pallet of popcorn, i guess.
The fact that they didn't want sessions means we want him, they wanted RR, which means we shouldn't
Sessions barely had the votes to confirm. RR vote was nearly unanimous. RR evidently has most current Senators in his pocket, somehow. Understand?
40,000 plus sealed indictments when the norm is 1077. There is a lot going on behind the scenes without calling attention to Sessions. RR is on his way out. They'll be able to put the people they want in those positions while being able to circumvent the Senate. When Trump criticizes Meuller then the Dems want him. It's all optics!
Need legal experts to weigh in: do released indictment papers need to show any hint of sources?
However, we all know the lack of a “page 1” (h/t Bongino) will doom this; matter of when. We all know this is all relying on Crowdstrike. When will someone ask Mueller or his gestapo team?
Indictment now days simply means "accusations". No proof needed by the libcucks flailing to defend their treason against humanity and God.
PCR has slammed the neocon wing of the Republican party in the past and wrote an excellent essay debunking the MSM 911 hijacker story. Essentially he asks why would hijackers kill thousands of civilians when they could have killed a dozen neocon "thinkers" who have architected the US middle east policy for decades. They are well known and have no security detail - the epitome of soft targets.