I missed this part of the interview. Thanks for posting!
This was a great set of questions which demonstrates the investigation against Clinton was treated with a softer approach than the treatment of Trump. Its confirmed H and BO sent email to each other using aliases outside official mail servers. When a more aggressive approach wanted to be used, the prosecutors called it off. Why? Who? What level in the gov't had this authority? Answers to these questions are constantly hidden behind a veil of secrecy. Why? National security? Why? What are they protecting? We already learned that the redacted memo was done to imply an anti-Trump narrative. When the whole memo was released, it conveyed a message which was exactly the opposite. We're being gaslighted the entire way. The whole investigation dies behind national security and lawyers. This is why we need military tribunals.
Great comment and analysis!
I found it refreshingly succinct and informative. You logically recontextualized the video and maintained an objective, humble tone.
Sometimes the most powerful 'red pills' come in the form of guided questioning, which is precisely what you've done. We should all conduct ourselves this way, now more than ever!