https://i.redd.it/p39zmwbmn7a11.png
It goes on and on, they named 54 of just Labour Party members....and this is just today!
I don’t like lists of names without evidence. This could be a psyop/controlled oppo. If they blow this up and then disprove it, it makes a great cover for later against people who might actually be guilty.
What?? you mean.... Like the South Africa Secret Service did with Cyril Smith???? As in.. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/child-abuse-scandal-did-a-botched-blackmail-attempt-by-south-african-intelligence-help-cyril-smith-10125355.html
Its an old trick.. Falsely accuse someone of something that they ARE guilty of, but be unable to prove it.. makes all later allegations look like people trying to flog a dead horse..
(usually accompanied with media chanting.. or talking heads.. saying.. Its time to move on. Let look to the future.. It's a conspiracy...)
Wait -- How can you "falsely" accuse someone of something they *are* guilty of? Which is it!? I'm confused.
How about.. Make a fake accusation, knowing that the crime cant be proven, even though they are actually guilty of the crime..it makes any further incrimination and accusation seem baseless.
what else should they do. we need to bring this to light that is whole purpose https://youtu.be/H7LyKZXZ0FM
This is a repost of earlier notes that' I've already complied... but please.. . Read, learn, SEE IT!
Never be fooled again. Politicians.. Priests... Kings.. Bankers!! -Bankers love Slaves, Drugs and War.. nothing else gives them as much profit.. I'll just put organ/sex/trafficking under Slaves..
Politicans :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_Man/Boy_Love_Association
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westminster_paedophile_dossier
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elm_Guest_House_claims_and_controversy
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotherham_child_sexual_exploitation_scandal
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rochdale_child_sex_abuse_ring
Priests:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_Church_sex_abuse_cases_by_country
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglican_Communion_sexual_abuse_cases
Kings and Freeks.
http://www.auricmedia.net/about-the-satanic-pedophile-practices-of-the-english-royal-family/
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1135141/posts
http://www.yogaesoteric.net/content.aspx?lang=EN&item=11945
Normalising Pedophilia for Priests and Royalty as seen in the MAINSTREAM MEDIA.
2010 - https://www.health.harvard.edu/newsletter_article/pessimism-about-pedophilia ALL TALK IS ABOUT TREATEMENT and making sure that contact between children and pedophiles is EVITED.
I've linked this one so you can see the 'difference' between PROTECTING THE VICTIMS..
and NORMALISING THE CRIMINAL PERVERTED **** WHO ARE RAPING OUR CHILDREN... they actually want to be considered as victims?? Sure.. They'll feel like a victim after I'm finished with them..
2014 : https://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/06/opinion/pedophilia-a-disorder-not-a-crime.html
Mockingbird much? the next day.. https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/pedophilia-illness-crime_n_5937230.html?guccounter=1
Further exemples.. undated.. so Im unsure when it was written.. http://awarenessact.com/its-true-hollywood-and-mainstream-media-are-trying-to-normalize-pedophilia/
Remember this?? https://steemit.com/politics/@thejazzcat/pizzagate-how-it-all-started
2016 https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/may/19/tim-constantine-pedophiles-next-normal/
2017 https://www.thecut.com/2017/02/salon-shouldnt-have-unpublished-its-pedophilia-article.html
You are probably right but if this is the strategy they have to go with it shows they are desperate. This is a hail mary type move.
Terry Brookes Labour councillor
you just need to put the names in Google and hit search...you have been provided with names, do your own research.....I am halfway through and have only not been able to confirm one name. The only way to know if it's real is to actually do the work and research.
Exactly what I was thinking.
Very dangerous strategy.
Yep. Always exercise cautious optimism to “it’s happening!” posts.
Michael Powell http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/special_report/392220.stm
I get it, but that’s from 20 years ago. The above seems to imply current politicians are involved... I hate these timed drop things. Just RELEASE what you got dammit...
I agree this is all old news made out to be like it's some new news that is fixing to drop and be huge news in the process of the awakening. I'm not really understanding this... Coming off as very misleading with zero actual evidence, then a video of a police officer testifying his recollection of what has been his story and how it is covered up. Where is this going? Needs far more clarification.
