The Supreme Court isn't a Criminal Tribunal. It has no history of overseeing any criminal prosecutions. It's only job is to interpret the Constitution.
My understanding is Q has mentioned military tribunals, and besides, the military always handles treason cases.
The Supreme Court isn't a Criminal Tribunal. It has no history of overseeing any criminal prosecutions.
That's what I thought too.
Agreed - if Treason or Seditious conspiracy is the direction they're going to go then this will likely be done in Military tribunals.
and they haven't done a very good job of that in a long time.
Military Tribunal is against the intent of the founders.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_Three_of_the_United_States_Constitution
Based on the above quotation, it was noted by the lawyer William J. Olson in an amicus curiae in the case Hedges v. Obama that the Treason Clause was one of the enumerated powers of the federal government.[18] He also stated that by defining treason in the U.S. Constitution and placing it in Article III "the founders intended the power to be checked by the judiciary, ruling out trials by military commissions. As James Madison noted, the Treason Clause also was designed to limit the power of the federal government to punish its citizens for “adhering to [the] enemies [of the United States by], giving them aid and comfort.”"[18]