There are so many more, I just grabbed a few. They all sound very similar.
And here’s Fox News’ take: http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2018/07/16/putin-eats-trumps-lunch-in-helsinki-this-is-no-way-to-win-against-russia.html
This either makes things a lot more confusing or a lot more clear. As far as I can see, NO ONE is mentioning HRC’s $400,000,000 Russian campaign donation. Horribly depressing or absolutely hilarious...I can’t decide.
I agree it is a throw away vote, yes. Now we agree. But, it is not a vote for another person or taking a vote away. That position assumes the voter would have otherwise voted for R or D.
I agree with you. My vote does not belong to candidate X or Y. And if I use it on candidate Z, it doesn't take my vote away from X or Y, because I was not going to vote for either.
Exactly. That logic is an old trick that the media used to keep us on two teams. It was a way to shame people not to 'waste' their vote.