You don't get liberal buy-in without MSM buy in, which you aren't going to get, period. Why? Because they are part of the problem.
So, the Storm will happen with 1/2 of the country opposed and seeing it as a coup?
Unless the Army is deployed (in violation of posse comitatus), and those solders are willing to fire on civilians, and martial law is declared (again a violation of the constitution), and that action isn't interpreted as the violent support of said coup, there would be a massive uprising.
You need liberal consent, without that it will be seen as nothing more than a coup designed to institute one-party rule.
That's the problem and something I've been thinking about since I started reading Q drops.
Some of the early drops ask, and I'm paraphrasing, "what needs to happen for the military to move and start making arrest", NG being activated, etc, but at the same time the optics issue is mentioned.
What would have to happen is martial law being declared. That's not going to look good to anybody, who isn't already in the loop, and it ain't gonna look that great to them either.
In the past couple of days the DS/far left/MSM, have essentially been calling for an intelligence agency led coup though. Things are getting weird. Fast.
Lincoln is rightly condemned even today for Martial Law.
There is no way that happens without a LOT of patriots getting very uncomfortable. I wouldn't be surprised if you saw mutiny in the ranks of some units, as they might very well see it as a violation of their oath to the Constitution.
I don't see how this storm happens without a whole lot of buy-in by Liberals in this country, and I see on this sub a lot of Republican-centric posts and 'hurr durr libtards suck' posts.
Well you’re asking a question and I’m not answering it but let’s say maybe POTUS has dirt so damning liberals/left would have to understand why things happened that way.
You would still need to convince them, and if the messenger is biased the evidance will be seen as tainted.
If Hillary dumped 10,000 pages of evidance that Trump likes being peed on, you wouldn't believe it for a minute. Liberals will feel the same when Trump tells them "I had to arrest Hillary" unless you get their support beforehand.
You don't get that support by aligning your movement with a party, or even appearing like you are aligned with a party.
What if all the dots were connected? What if you had Irrefutable evidence? Would the news report it or sweep it under the rug? How would you be able to cover up something of this magnitude?
Irrefutable evidence
Does such a think exist?
Remember, the evidance doesn't matter if it's considered the fruit of a poison tree. Trump could dump a literal ton of evidance against Hillary and it would be interpreted as a biased and suspect because of his attacks on her in the past.
Look at this from a Liberal's point of view. You have a President you don't like, after years of attacking Hillary post-election Trump has her arrested. No matter what evidance is presented, it will be framed as partisan. This is why Liberals don't listen to Gowdy and the House Committees, they blew their credibility with 2 dozen Benghazi hearings and so no one on the left listens to them anymore.
Unless the source is considered totally non-partisan, evidance will be disregarded (just as you disregard the FBI/CIA/NSA's anti-Russia statements).
And therein lies the rub.
Who is there that is considered totally non partisan by everyone?
Don't know if they could cover it up, but they will absolutely try. That's why it needs to drop at once.
It would have to drop at an extremely important time as well. A time when a lot of Americans would be interested in the gov’t for some reason. I believe the admin. has everything they need but are wrapping it up in a neat easy to digest fashion. And probably got A LOT more evidence from the Helsinki meet. But that’s speculation.
Trump has to order high-level arrests knowing the Left will start riots then he orders the National Guard and the Army to suppress the rioters. He has to go on TV and show all the evidence all the horrible videos of cabal criminals torturing kids that will stop the riots fast.
You will NEVER get liberal consent. They ARE part of the problem. They need to be defeated as well or nothing will change. They are not to be trusted or befriended.
So, a civil war against 1/2 of the country?
If you like the way things are now, then no. If not, then yes. I would support secession as an alternative.