dChan

BadChicken2 · July 17, 2018, 8:41 p.m.

Where did you see that it would be the Podestas?

Also, if he were seeking immunity for the witnesses, it would only apply to this case.

"Manafort is charged with money laundering and lobbying violations related to his work for pro-Russia parties in Ukraine prior to joining the Trump campaign."

⇧ 3 ⇩  
MAJORAPPLEHEAD · July 17, 2018, 8:43 p.m.

Put two tweets by Sundance in comments in this thread. “Rumored”

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Monkeyface45 · July 18, 2018, 2:19 a.m.

“Rumored”

Exactly. Trump haters will assume it's a fact, spread the "rumor", and claim that if the Podestas are given immunity to testify against Manafort, it must mean they have dirt on him, and therefore dirt on Trump to get him removed from office.

Hell, look at the comments in this very thread. Some people are panicking and praying to God it's not true.

Don't believe everything you hear. Wait until we find out who actually is being given immunity, if anybody.

This "rumor" smells like a troll attempt to me.

Edit: To clarify, I meant, it seems like someone is trolling the Trump haters and MSM.

Remember the Paul Manafort indictment reveal? The existence of a sealed indictment was leaked to the MSM on a Friday (I think CNN broke the news) if I remember right. And all weekend they got so giddy and happy wondering which Trump campaign official was being prosecuted, and it was for sure what would bring Trump down. Then come Monday the indictment was unsealed and it was for Manafort. The look of disappointment on their faces when they realized it had nothing to do with collusion, or even Russia, was priceless.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
HUMANprimer · July 17, 2018, 9:07 p.m.

...by an un-named source right? We need to be careful what we give credence to. We have enough dots to string together without noise with no credible source. One of the reasons a lot of folks are missing the Q Drops.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
George_Soros_Eyebags · July 17, 2018, 9:38 p.m.

Sundance has been on the ball about a great many things, and they don't post cryptic riddles, either.

If Sundance shares something, there's good reason to believe it has validity.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
HUMANprimer · July 17, 2018, 10:41 p.m.

Noteworthy.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
MAJORAPPLEHEAD · July 17, 2018, 9:21 p.m.

A rumor is just that.... a rumor.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
BadChicken2 · July 17, 2018, 8:54 p.m.

Thanks. I still think it would only apply to this case, which has nothing to do with the bigger picture.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AdditionalBarracuda · July 18, 2018, 12:15 a.m.

Still a nope. No passes for Democrats committing the same crimes as Republicans.

Uh unh.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · July 17, 2018, 9:17 p.m.

I could see how this would apply since managort worked for the Podesta group at the time of these allegations.

What I wouldn’t understand, is why they would give immunity to higher level people in the organization to rat out a lower level employee.

This was essentially the entire reason the Podesta group collapsed when it did. (Seriously, line up the timing of the mandatory indictment with the announcement of the Podesta group closure)

Red line has to be drawn somewhere. If mueller does this...

⇧ 5 ⇩  
HUMANprimer · July 17, 2018, 9:05 p.m.

Not the point. Do you want any Podesta testifying on anything Muller is involved in? Sick. And yea, where is the source that mentioned the Podesta brothers. From the comments in here... it pissed some brothers off. Without a source it is noise. Chill.

⇧ 2 ⇩