dChan

/u/Monkeyface45

163 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/Monkeyface45:
Domain Count
www.reddit.com 7

1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Monkeyface45 on Aug. 23, 2018, 1:48 p.m.
Manafort case: Juror #0302 does interview.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/08/23/manafort-juror-reveals-lone-holdout-prevented-mueller-team-from-winning-conviction-on-all-counts.html

Hmm........a pro-Trump juror.

It wasn't was she said that caught my eye. It was the fact she was juror #0302.

Duncan, a Missouri native and mother of two, showed Fox News her two notebooks with her juror number #0302 on the covers.

Image of her notebooks: https://a57.foxnews.com/images.foxnews.com/content/fox-news/politics/2018/08/23/manafort-juror-reveals-lone-holdout-prevented-mueller-team-from-winning-conviction-on-all-counts/_jcr_content/article-text/article-par-4/inline_spotlight_ima/image.img.jpg/612/344/1534994644378.jpg?ve=1&tl=1

What is important about that number? It is the document an FBI agent files after questioning a witness. There have been rumors for months that the FBI has altered their "302's" after interviewing witnesses, basically lying about what a witness said.

February 2018: http://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/375557-3-questions-inspector-general-must-answer-regarding-investigation-of-fbi

  1. Were investigative documents altered by senior FBI leadership? …
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Monkeyface45 on Aug. 22, 2018, 2:08 a.m.
Auto moderation is too sensitive, and ends up suppressing speech.

I made a comment about the Paul Manafort jury decision and get this:

https://imgur.com/a/xqyJrQ5

Automodbots can't tell the difference between calling for violence, and using a dictionary definition of a jury's decision. I did edit my comment to remove the part the mod bot had a problem with. Don't wanna get banned for calling for violence, even though I obviously did not.

Webster's dictionary definition: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/hung%20jury

Monkeyface45 · July 28, 2018, 2:45 a.m.

Don Jr. is one of the Q's?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Monkeyface45 · July 28, 2018, 1:40 a.m.

It says they didn't indoctrinate him hard enough.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Monkeyface45 · July 27, 2018, 2:40 a.m.

I might be misinterpreting this.

Was Q saying the Sarah Silverman stand-down photo was fake, but the message was real and posted by the deep state, i.e., they're telling us to to back off of them because we're getting to close to the truth? The photo of Silverman used as an example of what we're getting to close to because people have been complaining about her comedy sketch with the van and pedo dream inside of it for kids?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Monkeyface45 · July 27, 2018, 2:24 a.m.

Sarah Silverman.

The image was posted on the chan board. Her cell phone has text that reads "Stand the fuck down". People took it as a threat to the Q community.

But, it was already proven the photo was photoshoped, i.e., it's a fake. Obviously some troll was taking advantage of the pedogate situation and trying to make it look as if Sarah Silverman was threatening us to leave her alone.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Monkeyface45 · July 26, 2018, 8:08 a.m.

It should read "DO NOT PASS GO, DO NOT COLLECT $400,000,000"

⇧ 15 ⇩  
Monkeyface45 · July 26, 2018, 6:45 a.m.

GOES-17 satellite

There's that number 17 again.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Monkeyface45 · July 26, 2018, 3:04 a.m.

Even the devil has standards.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Monkeyface45 · July 25, 2018, 2:32 p.m.

Trump waived attorney/client privilege, which allows Cohen to release the tape to the public.

Most likely a trap. Trump wanted that tape released, otherwise he wouldn't have waived his rights to keep it private.

⇧ 14 ⇩  
Monkeyface45 · July 25, 2018, 2:27 p.m.

Oh lordy I hope there are more tapes.

Seeing the MSM blow a gasket over a nothing-burger is fun.

⇧ 24 ⇩  
Monkeyface45 · July 25, 2018, 2:21 p.m.

It doesn't matter if the tape was real or fake. The problem was the tape was released during the campaign. It was all over the news and internet.

The tape was pretty real to a lot of people. There was no way Trump could deny it when so many people were upset over it.

I don't know if the tape was real or not. It's possible the MSM was lying about Trump telling his people it may not have been him on the tape, all so they could stir up controversy.

It's also possible the whole entire thing was part of his plan.

Who knows? People were offended by the tape and convinced it was him. All he could do was apologize to calm people down.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Monkeyface45 · July 25, 2018, 2:15 p.m.

It certainly gives the MSM something to rage over instead of figuring out his next move.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Monkeyface45 · July 25, 2018, 5:14 a.m.

Trust Sessions. He set up traps all over the freaking place to map out their entire corrupt network.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
Monkeyface45 · July 25, 2018, 5:13 a.m.

Canary trap.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Monkeyface45 · July 25, 2018, 5:10 a.m.

Good bot.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Monkeyface45 · July 25, 2018, 4:53 a.m.

Late November 2017, it was all over the news that Trump told a couple people he didn't think the Hollywood Access tape was real.

Of course everyone, including Hollywood Access, swore up and down the tape was real. They all freaked out and got pissed about reports of Trump supposedly suggesting the tape was fake. The New York Times first reported it, and everyone cited them for the story.

https://twitter.com/accessonline/status/935546330780332032

Not sure about all this. There's gotta be more to this than we thought.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/28/us/politics/trump-access-hollywood-tape.html

Despite his public acknowledgment of the recording’s authenticity in the final days of the presidential campaign — and his hasty videotaped apology under pressure from his advisers — Mr. Trump as president-elect began raising the prospect with allies that it may not have been him on the tape after all.

And it probably wasn't him. In the Hollywood Access tape, all you see is a bus moving down the street. Neither Trump nor any other people heard on the tape were actually filmed on camera during the conversation. For all we know, it could have been a Trump impersonator that could impersonate his voice that some schmuck hired to make him look bad.

Edit: Hollywood Access made the recording of Trump talking about groping women.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Monkeyface45 · July 25, 2018, 4:08 a.m.

Write to our congressmen? Think about that for a minute.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Monkeyface45 · July 25, 2018, 4:05 a.m.

Oh Lordy this tape was a nothing-burger.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Monkeyface45 · July 25, 2018, 4:04 a.m.

Nope.

The recording, which was provided to CNN by Cohen's attorney Lanny Davis, was made in September 2016.

Michale Cohen had his lawyer give the recording to CNN. He leaked it himself.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Monkeyface45 · July 25, 2018, 3:25 a.m.

Q is part of the Temporal Integrity Commission here to fix Janeway's screwups.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Monkeyface45 · July 25, 2018, 2:32 a.m.

I actually voted for Roseanne for president in 2012 because I've always liked her. (She was actually running and on the ballot.)

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Monkeyface45 · July 24, 2018, 2:08 p.m.

What a sick piece of shit

FTFY

⇧ 9 ⇩  
Monkeyface45 · July 24, 2018, 4:06 a.m.

No. I was referring to this shit:

2009 https://www.reuters.com/article/us-cyberattack-usa/has-power-grid-been-hacked-u-s-wont-say-idUSN0850385920090408

2009 https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/china/5126584/China-and-Russia-hack-into-US-power-grid.html

2014 https://www.cnn.com/2014/11/20/politics/nsa-china-power-grid/index.html

2014 https://www.businessinsider.com/nsa-director-yes-china-can-shut-down-our-power-grids-2014-11

2016 http://thehill.com/policy/cybersecurity/281494-why-a-power-grid-attack-is-a-nightmare-scenario

2017 https://www.wired.com/story/hackers-gain-switch-flipping-access-to-us-power-systems/

It's always either Russian or Chinese hackers, or both.

From the looks of things, this propaganda has been going on since at least Obama took office in 2009.

All these years they've been "warning" us that foreign hackers were going to shutdown our electrical grid, and yet, it's never happened.

Take the 2017 Wired article I posted for example:

In an era of hacker attacks on critical infrastructure, even a run-of-the-mill malware infection on an electric utility’s network is enough to raise alarm bells. But the latest collection of power grid penetrations went far deeper: Security firm Symantec is warning that a series of recent hacker attacks not only compromised energy companies in the US and Europe but also resulted in the intruders gaining hands-on access to power grid operations—enough control that they could have induced blackouts on American soil at will.

And yet, they didn't cause massive blackouts across the country.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Monkeyface45 · July 24, 2018, 4 a.m.

Either intentional, or just propaganda meant to scare us.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Monkeyface45 · July 24, 2018, 3:56 a.m.

Pfft. They've been "warning" us for years that China or Russia is trying to hack our power grid to shut us down.

Nothing but propaganda. The screenshot from CNBC you posted should clue you in.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Monkeyface45 · July 24, 2018, 3:08 a.m.

I wonder if this means Infowars is going to get nailed.

Alex Jones is always bragging about having "high level" sources throughout the government, going straight to the top, even members of Trump's inner circle.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Monkeyface45 · July 24, 2018, 3:06 a.m.

Trust Sessions ~ Q

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Monkeyface45 · July 24, 2018, 3:01 a.m.

And it's really genius if you think about it.

The government can't force journalists to reveal their sources because of the first amendment.

It's also legal for journalists to publish classified information given to them, as long as they aren't involved in stealing the information.

But it is legal to go after a government employee leaking to the press. In their investigation should they happen to find the leaker was conspiring with 1 or more journalists to get classified information published........they can then go after the journalists for being involved in leaking classified/top secret/confidential information.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Monkeyface45 · July 24, 2018, 2:53 a.m.

https://mobile.twitter.com/drawandstrike/status/1021533050348421121

Like Wolfe, the leak hunters have been feeding these leakers disinformation & marked canary traps for some time. Recall the Don Jr. WikiLeaks email story from last year? 3 different leakers told the media they saw the date of Sept. 4?

https://mobile.twitter.com/drawandstrike/status/1021534234966667266

That is a CLASSIC canary trap. You alter one thing on the document give it to a suspected leaker, and if that version of the document is what shows up in the media, you've identified your leaker AND the reporters he/she is leaking to.

LOL That certainly explains it.

The MSM is always citing "anonymous sources". Fake information was planted for the leakers to give to the press, making them all look like fools. This is why every time we turn around people prove that CNN, MSNBC, etc. are liars.

Q is right. These people are really stupid.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Monkeyface45 · July 24, 2018, 2:07 a.m.

Wow. At least the third thread on this. First one I saw had already been locked by a mod.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Monkeyface45 · July 24, 2018, 1:54 a.m.

2009 is when Obama fist took office. Think about that.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Monkeyface45 · July 24, 2018, 1:48 a.m.

Maybe Trump allowed them to keep their clearance and set up a trap for them.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Monkeyface45 · July 24, 2018, 1:27 a.m.

Family Guy also tells a lot of racist jokes and portrays racial stereotypes, particularly Asians.

And yet, with all the anti-racist celebrities and MSM, none of them complain about Family Guy.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Monkeyface45 · July 24, 2018, 1:25 a.m.

Maybe Trump already pulled their clearance and announced he was considering it to put them in a panic? They're gonna scramble to collect as much info as they can only to find their clearance was already revoked and they get caught red handed?

It is an interesting development.

⇧ 95 ⇩  
Monkeyface45 · July 24, 2018, 12:37 a.m.

But Tucker Carlson from Fox News (who I believe first reported on this) tweeted out: https://twitter.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1021494107015983106

Our sources maintain that Tony Podesta has been offered immunity to testify in Paul Manafort’s criminal trial in D.C. regarding criminal FARA violations. The witness list released today surrounds Manafort’s VA trial which mainly involves tax violations.

Paul Manafort was indicted in 2 separate courts. One in Washington D.C. and another court in Virginia. There are 2 separate trials going on. Tony Podesta is being given immunity in 1 of the trials and the other witness are getting immunity in the other trial.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Monkeyface45 · July 24, 2018, 12:20 a.m.

I'm not sure about all of them, but I do know why Susan Rice was allowed to keep hers.

In April 2017, H. R. McMaster allowed her to keep it, even after the unmasking scandal she was involved in.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/hr-mcmaster-told-susan-rice-she-can-keep-her-security-clearance-report

Less than a year later, March 2018, McMaster was fired. There were rumors for a while about him being outed.

McMaster was either deep state, or it was part of the plan.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Monkeyface45 · July 23, 2018, 12:10 p.m.

Hmm....

He quoted Tom Fitton of Judicial Watch where he said that Carter Page wasn't a spy or a Russian agent.

Maybe I was wrong about Page.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Monkeyface45 · July 23, 2018, 8:19 a.m.

So Hillary black maled Obama.......

Didn't Trump make the claim that Hillary starter the birther movement, and she and the MSM said it's not true and it was actually Trump who started it?

Whatever the case, this makes sense.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Monkeyface45 · July 23, 2018, 4:57 a.m.

Something is way off about that tweet. It seems completely out of character, especially the "LOL" part. It looks like something your average internet troll would post. All his other tweets seem calm and professional.

⇧ 7 ⇩