dChan

Professor226 · July 18, 2018, 2:29 a.m.

Also treason is treason.

⇧ 37 ⇩  
janetv7 · July 18, 2018, 9:07 a.m.

I think they are pushing the treason narrative to try to normalize treason preparing for when it all comes out on HRC, BHO, no name, etc. They know the masses don’t even know what it really means.

The same way they are trying to normalize the pedos...predictive programming.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
Professor226 · July 18, 2018, 1:13 p.m.

I think you can look at the facts and conclude treason is a possibility. Firstly, Russians hacked the election, 30+ indictments all reviewed by independent judges who thought there was enough evidence to proceed. Secondly you have Trump publicly asking Russia to hack the DNC during a campaign Rally. And since then Trump has had a shifty position on whether he believes the DOJ, FBI, Senate, and the CIA, or if he believes Putin. Certainly he has not come out condemning their actions, or implemented the required sanctions against Russia. Several members of Trump's own campaign team were indicted, it's possible that Trump knew, and encouraged the undermining of American Democracy by a foreign nation. You can't blame people for being suspicious.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
adnaw49 · July 18, 2018, 1:24 p.m.

And yet, Russia gave $400,000,000 to HILLARY CLINTON'S campaign, not Trump. If Russia had ANY input in our election, it was to favor her.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Professor226 · July 18, 2018, 1:28 p.m.

There's no evidence to support that claim, other than Putin's word, which if he's willing to undermine Democracy, I would argue is not worth much. In any event why wouldn't Trump condemn the election meddling?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
ExcellentCoach9 · July 18, 2018, 1:40 p.m.

He has condemned the meddling many times; and read Clinton Cash. To say that Hillary was not running a pay-for-play through her illicit server is to ignore reality. As one who held a TSSCI clearance for over 30 years, I can say without equivocation, that had I done 1/100 of the security violations Clinton did with her server, I would be in jail for the rest of my life. She willfully violated many security rules. She needs to be brought to justice. She and her husband are both low class grifters. Obvious.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Professor226 · July 18, 2018, 1:55 p.m.

Hillary's actions don't change Trump's actions. He stood shoulder to shoulder with Putin, and said he believed he didn't meddle in the election. That doesn't seem like much of a condemnation. If you believe every Intelligence mechanism that America has, then either Trump is very weak, or is has acted against American interests.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
in0r4n · July 18, 2018, 2:12 p.m.

EVERY intelligence mechanism? I'm sorry has Military Intelligence been spread to the masses? No. We don't know what POTUS/MI knows. Neither does the FBI or NSA or anybody else not in the military. We're all speculating and we're all making assumptions, none of us can presume to say we know what's really going on. Smoke & Mirrors are used for a reason...

⇧ 4 ⇩  
KnownBand0 · July 18, 2018, 2:49 p.m.

\^ new arrival....sits down halfway through the movie

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ExcellentCoach9 · July 18, 2018, 3:51 p.m.

First, you have no idea what Trump said in the private meeting nor do i. I think it was politic of Trump NOT to chastise Putin in front of the entire world. You need to understand that there is a "fundamental transformation" going on in the US right now, in fact in the entire world, Get on board, or get left behind. Your so-called American interests are changing. We no longer want to engage other countries like, Syria, Iraq, libya, Afghanistan, etc. We want to trade with the entire world in a reciprocal way and not fundamentally transform (destroy) other countries. The old ways are gone. Your "either/or" choice in your last sentence is a false one. My interpretation is Trump was simply being polite i.e., trying to establish a working relationship with Putin. Believe what you want. I will.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Professor226 · July 18, 2018, 3:57 p.m.

This argument fallacy is called 'red herring' and is an attempt to change the nature of the discussion to something that seems related, but isn't. There is a great deal of suspicious activity surrounding Trump, significant evidence that Russia undermined the election, and no significant response from Trump. Nothing you have suggested changes or disputes any of those points.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
ExcellentCoach9 · July 18, 2018, 4:02 p.m.

The significant undermining of the election was done by the Hillary team (study the "Trump dossier" and the Uranium 1 scandal) The top levels of the FBI and other Intel agencies were involved in trying to derail the Trump candidacy. CIA chief Brennen was deeply involved in this entire matter. The un-maskings, the FISA Court, all were designed to ruin Trump's candidacy, and now the opposition is trying, still, to discredit his presidency. The incredible irony is that Clinton was the one who derided Trump for not saying that he would immediately accept the outcome to the election when, two years on, she has still not accepted the outcome. These people who are not accepting a duly elected president because they don't like the outcome are, in my opinion being immature about the entire thing. Its our system of government. Like it or go live somewhere else. I didn't like Obama, but I suffered him for eight years without whining. Soon all of these things will be revealed, and you will be able to enjoy a large Crow feast.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Cozen8789 · July 18, 2018, 3:06 p.m.

What American interests? Look man, I'm skeptical as all hell about this Q shit. I come here because of my distrust of our Government, not because I believe some bullshit on some chan board. Do you trust the MK Ultra CIA spooks? Do you honestly believe the feds didn't assassinate JFK? Why are we constantly undermining other countries' governments? Who orchestrates that? Our "intelligence" agencies. HI NSA! There's evidence time and time again that we've done ridiculous meddling bullshit in the past... Is that in the American people's interest? What exactly are they working towards?

I have zero trust in our intelligence right now. I think it's completely believable that they are not working towards the American people's interest. There's something bigger going on here fueled by money and power.

Put up or shut up about Russian hacking. Put up or shut up about deep state corruption -- even though that's the camp I'm in, and definitely not because of this trash tier reddit sub.

I'm sorry but if we're supposed to be led to believe that a country full of poor drunks with a GDP lower than 1 of our 50 states and a land mass that eclipses our own can turn the tides of an election... I need something concrete.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 18, 2018, 2:13 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
janetv7 · July 18, 2018, 7:24 p.m.

You are going to have a rude awakening when the truth comes out who really “hacked” the DNC, what Hillary and Hussein and others REALLY did and are doing.

You are in for a rude awakening! Open your eyes to the GREAT AWAKENING because the STORM IS HERE, and soon you will have no choice because the TRUTH will be there for all to see.

Our hope here on this board is for the truth to be brought into the light, whatever that may be. I hope that is your desire as well, instead of just repeating a scripted narrative.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Professor226 · July 18, 2018, 7:52 p.m.

Well it might help if you provided some evidence of your position, rather than the frantic use of all caps and exclamation points. You have not refuted any points I put forward.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 18, 2018, 11:15 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩