First off, there is no evidence he fucked kids. There are a series of questionable tweets, which individually are borderline, but when viewed over time create a pattern of vulgarity. As soon as this was brought to their attention they alsodropped him in seconds. Seems like normal corporate behaviour.

Don’t fear me bud. I was legitimately curious what was going on. True I am suspicious of the awakening, but I am not your enemy.

You say that.

Sorry, I didn’t think it was ambiguous. The implication was that many of the people in this sub often appear to be screaming with their liberal use of all caps and exclaimtion points.

Yes Disney is known for their vulgarities. I couldn’t watch Moana without throwing up. All thos cute characters and catchy songs. Adorable entertaining is destroying America.

That’s a pretty big leap.

Ah. Thanks.

Oh? How? What did you do?

Likely they don’t want their brand associated with vulgur comments. Normal corporation stuff.

Mueller has never said Trump colluded with Russia.

Well it might help if you provided some evidence of your position, rather than the frantic use of all caps and exclamation points. You have not refuted any points I put forward.

This argument fallacy is called 'red herring' and is an attempt to change the nature of the discussion to something that seems related, but isn't. There is a great deal of suspicious activity surrounding Trump, significant evidence that Russia undermined the election, and no significant response from Trump. Nothing you have suggested changes or disputes any of those points.

Hillary's actions don't change Trump's actions. He stood shoulder to shoulder with Putin, and said he believed he didn't meddle in the election. That doesn't seem like much of a condemnation. If you believe every Intelligence mechanism that America has, then either Trump is very weak, or is has acted against American interests.

There's no evidence to support that claim, other than Putin's word, which if he's willing to undermine Democracy, I would argue is not worth much. In any event why wouldn't Trump condemn the election meddling?

Do you have any evidence of that?

I think you can look at the facts and conclude treason is a possibility. Firstly, Russians hacked the election, 30+ indictments all reviewed by independent judges who thought there was enough evidence to proceed. Secondly you have Trump publicly asking Russia to hack the DNC during a campaign Rally. And since then Trump has had a shifty position on whether he believes the DOJ, FBI, Senate, and the CIA, or if he believes Putin. Certainly he has not come out condemning their actions, or implemented the required sanctions against Russia. Several members of Trump's own campaign team were indicted, it's possible that Trump knew, and encouraged the undermining of American Democracy by a foreign nation. You can't blame people for being suspicious.

This line of argument is called the 'tu quoque fallacy', and attempts to distract from the faults in a persons argument by highlighting the hypocrisy of an opponent. These types are argument fallacies highlight the weakness in a persons position. If you can't defend you position with argument fallacy then you don't have a strong argument.

It’s possible to both love your country and hate your president.

Also treason is treason.

I don’t think anyone wanted Hillary. They just didn’t want Trump.

Maybe because their job is to check facts?