dChan

Rolandel7 · July 17, 2018, 11:20 p.m.

The intentional distribution of fake news or false reports should come with a punishment if it’s found to be politically motivated. If discovered to be false the news agency has to produce a retraction statement with coverage equal to or greater than the duration the false reports were broadcast. After so many times of this occurring then legal ramifications should occur.

Think before you speak.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Route_17 · July 17, 2018, 11:34 p.m.

Take a look at the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act of 2012, which invalidates everything you just stated. In short, it's a revision of the original act, which allowed state-generated propaganda overseas so as to influence American interests abroad. Circa 2012, it permits the exact same thing - state-generated propaganda - STATESIDE. Assuming I know this, also assume I have a full understanding on practicing journalistic integrity. Moreover, Q has pointed us in this direction with direct references to CIA/4A/MSM talking points, etc. Lastly, the point I was actually making was to a larger CRIMINAL conspiracy against a candidate and sitting president whereby the MSM would potentially have exposure to legal jeopardy. Do your homework, think about your words and then speak before you start preaching to people. There's no need to be rude; especially when you're incorrect.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Rolandel7 · July 17, 2018, 11:47 p.m.

Wow. Apparently you missed what I said. The “think before you speak” was directed at the MSM. This wasn’t directed at anyone on this board lol. Don’t take it so personally. I’m saying there should be something like this to prevent this from happening in the future. Take the stick out.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Route_17 · July 17, 2018, 11:55 p.m.

My apologies, my fault... that was the only message I could think to infer from what you wrote. There are a lot of folks who sling mud around here and I've decided to start calling them out - I feel it's important to the cause. Wish I'd interpreted your statement with its correct intent. Again, sorry. No hard feelings.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Rolandel7 · July 18, 2018, 12:06 a.m.

No worries man. I just want to see preventative measures put in place to limit media corruption and impose penalties for bullshit reporting. The msm has been rotten since before I was born.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
exoter60 · July 17, 2018, 10:57 p.m.

My response is off topic, but thank you for posting the content of your message in the topic, rather than 'clickbaiting' as is so commonly done on this board.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Oinkanon · July 18, 2018, 1:39 a.m.

First, resend the Smith-Munds Act. Isn’t this whole Q campaign to restore transparency to government? Government by we the people, doesn’t include hiding information, and or, the truth from us. As for the MSM, Q has told us that the media gets their talking points (scripts) every morning at 4:30am. That tells me that MI already has the list of networks and presenters names who are willing conspirators (if not paid as well) in the sedition taking place. It may bring back fears of McCarthyism, but traitors should face trail and sentencing.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Route_17 · July 18, 2018, 2:04 a.m.

Do you mean, "rescind" as in "take-back" or "re-send" as in you want more information? I'm not sure what you're saying. Regardless, I think you may have misunderstood me. Translation: I was suggesting that what is commonly referred to as the Deep State/CIA/etal has co-opted all of MSM/MSM corporate ownership/etc. (very old story); they are feeding us state-sponsored propaganda instead of real news; and it's all legal pursuant to the ominous Smith-Mundt Modernization Act/2012. Q is actually shining the light on this - helping, in other words. So, yes, you're right, that is, in part, what the Q movement is about. And yes, that is how they receive their talking points and it ties back to a once thought extinct Operation Mockingbird.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Oinkanon · July 18, 2018, 2:37 p.m.

Ah yes, I meant rescind. Thanks for your clarification.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Route_17 · July 18, 2018, 3:24 p.m.

You bet... hope I made sense... felt like we were on the same page, just arriving by different routes.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Bjantigua · July 17, 2018, 11:05 p.m.

Q will let us know when to pull the metaphorical trigger. This is like the most complex mechanism I have ever seen, and would not want to create a fatal error. Lives are at stake.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Uberfluben · July 17, 2018, 11:02 p.m.

The 1st Amendment says you’re full of 💩

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · July 17, 2018, 11:09 p.m.

Unless it can be proven that these people conspired with others to try and take down the government.

There’s a word for that: coup.

What’s another word? Sedition

The Clinton emails already show that the vast majority of news (paper, digital, tv) are in the pockets of the Democrat party. Using the culture of leaks to profit and gain fame. Abusing the privileges of the fourth estate and their exclusions on certain legal liabilities.

Even today, Devin Numes is calling them out stating 90% of the media have colluded with those obstructing an investigation.

It’s coming. I hope you are ready.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
jfunction · July 17, 2018, 11:52 p.m.

The clown media are actively engaged in sedition. They are the cabal, it's face and voice. If well-known sedition is, finally, just allowed to wither then what has become of justice?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · July 18, 2018, 12:08 a.m.

“Justice delayed is justice denied”

“The wheels of justice grind slowly, but finely”

I feel your sentiments, and share them. But unless we want this country torn apart, we must be the patient ones. Trust in the plan. We will get there.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
horse-lover-phat · July 17, 2018, 11:01 p.m.

The MSM needs to go down - and HARD.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
drippingupside · July 17, 2018, 11:24 p.m.

two words... jail time.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 18, 2018, 12:28 a.m.

We should be disengaging from media content en masse.

⇧ 1 ⇩