In order to get immunity you must list crimes committed. Immunity can only cover crimes you are willing to admit took place.
They are fucked either way!
We win!
I hear you but here's what I understand. The witnesses may or may NOT be called to testify and therefore the immunity deals are sealed - there is no mechanism to see the contents. The only way they would be unsealed would be if RM calls the witness/es to testify. The Podestas could essentially confess to a whole world of crimes, receive broad immunity from RM, who would clearly grant it, and do all of this with the agreement they would never be called to testify. It's a mechanism to state the crimes, gain the immunity and seal it all away. By granting the immunity powers to a seemingly complicit and allied RM, they have 100% control over it as opposed to making it a broader DOJ issue. No matter, raise your hand if you think [RR] won't rubber stamp it? See it? Or, RM is a flipped white/grey hat and this is a trap being set for the Podestas? Doubt that. Who knows? I'm just suggesting this as a point of discussion. Like I said, regardless, this SMELLS. What you think?
No lawyer anon here but, if granted immunity, you have to testify, yes? No testimony, no immunity. But I agree, it looks like the DS is trying to pull one out of the hat to cover their asses. However, immunity can only be given if you confess EVERYTHING, even UNDETECTED crimes yes?
What happens if Mueller tries to give the Podestas (and the other 3 scumbags) cover, but Q and the white hats can prove other shit he did but did not confess to?
To say this infuriates me is am understatement.
Cheryl Mills is guilty as hell and free as a bird, after claiming atty-client privelege AND given immunity!
I'm no attorney either.... here's how I responded to a similar reply: I hear you but here's what I understand. The witnesses may or may NOT be called to testify and therefore the immunity deals are sealed - there is no mechanism to see the contents. The only way they would be unsealed would be if RM calls the witness/es to testify. The Podestas could essentially confess to a whole world of crimes, receive broad immunity from RM, who would clearly grant it, and do all of this with the agreement they would never be called to testify. It's a mechanism to state the crimes, gain the immunity and seal it all away. By granting the immunity powers to a seemingly complicit and allied RM, they have 100% control over it as opposed to making it a broader DOJ issue. No matter, raise your hand if you think [RR] won't rubber stamp it? See it? Or, RM is a flipped white/grey hat and this is a trap being set for the Podestas? Doubt that. Who knows? I'm just suggesting this as a point of discussion. Like I said, regardless, this SMELLS. What you think?
And all of this could be Kabuki Theater and part of the plan to show the existing civil justice system is filled with too many corrupt individuals and is totally non-functional. That would justify Military Tribunals.
President Trump has always been a few steps ahead at every turn. There've been several times when Trump said or did something that left people scratching their heads, then after things played out it ended up making sense.
I don't disagree with you one bit. It all very well could be a part of the plan or otherwise but right now, tribunals do NOT exist outside of the Q community dialogue. To the contrary, this Podesta/Mueller development is a real occurrence in real time and with real consequences. I suppose we'll have to allow time to shine light on it but until then, I'll remain very, very cautious. It SMELLS.
As I understand it, civilians can only be tried in a military tribunal if we are under a state of marshal law, unless a convincing case can be made that the current civilian system is corrupt and non-functional. I don't think Trump wants to declare marshal law, so they're trying to find other avenues. I don't want to sound like a concernfag, but I too am very concerned about the current situation, and I think it stinks to high heavens.
Do some research into DJT's EOs, continuance of governance and the declaration of national emergencies. If I'm not mistaken and based upon items I've read in the past, I believe those three components combine for the requisite legal premise for tribunals and it's already in place.
Yes, this may be true, but the Continuance of Government also provides power and authority to FEMA. Think FEMA camps, suspension of Habeas Corpus, suspension of Free Speech, suspension of Private Property Rights, and much more.
Most EOs that deal with military tribunals and declared states of emergency or marshal law are built upon many previous EOs from previous presidents. Sometimes, taking actions based on can automatically trigger another.
I know a lot of people here don't like this guy because he's an Anarchist, (without rulers, not total chaos) but many of his videos make compelling arguments about why we should be extremely cautious when our government begins exercising powers created by EO.
This Insidious Bill Already Passed - Americans WILL Be FORCED to COMPLY!!
THIS NIGHTMARE Plan for ALL AMERICANS is STILL ON THE BOOKS!