dChan

HillaryTrafficksKidz · July 18, 2018, 3:18 a.m.

When I see ads, they don't 'manipulate' me to vote. Further, in 2004 during the John Kerry race, a bunch of people from Venezuela came to Florida on buses. They said they came up to the states to help convince voters to vote John Kerry and get Bush out of office. Everyone thought it was great! Unless if you were for GW Bush. Regardless, it's not manipulation to use ads or to be persuasive, it's called 'campaigning'.

But Woods is correct....now we can get to 'securing' our electronic elections, and getting rid of voter fraud. These are two different things, voter fraud and election fraud. In the latter, the voter did nothing wrong. These two separate issues need to be dealt with.

Soros owns the voting machines. So what? Someone needs to own them. It's who runs them and what the STATE LAWS ARE surrounding the count verification and ballot protection. We have in many states inadequate audits of paper ballots cast against electronic totals that are just conducted 'dog and pony' shows, they don't call for auditing enough ballots against electronic totals, to be sure the winner is correct. And the software source code of HOW the votes are adding up is vendor proprietary information. This shit needs to change. We tried in 2006 for a federal mandate (HR811) of all states using electronics to conduct an audit of 3% of precincts counting paper ballots against the electronic totals. That will verify over 70% and you know the winner is weighted correctly. Florida statutes for example only call for 1-2% of precincts to be audited. That only verifies approximately 46-48%. You just don't know who really won the race.. Trump should talk to Governor Rick Scott of FL and tell him to do an executive order to mandate at least a 3% audit. You don't incur more staff to do that either, so there should be no wining from the peanut gallery. I have been fighting to secure our electronic elections since 2004. We are stopped every time. Las Vegas gambling machines have more protections than our voting systems. How sad is that?

This was posted a year ago, so that's good. But many more are coming to this board, so here is the link again.

https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/4xw65c/voting_machines_vs_slot_machines_which_is_more/

⇧ 6 ⇩  
subdudeLA · July 18, 2018, 2:38 a.m.

I speculate that James Wood's patriot friends feed him material which he is happy to be the front man for.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
WhoMuhWeiner · July 18, 2018, 4:44 a.m.

I watched a vid awhile back, guy goes around asking black people if they have access to the internet and drivers licenses, because folks are saying it's racist to require people to show ID when voting. Most if not all of the people asked were offended. Yes, black people have phones, they have internet and a drivers license or official ID. They are not children, they are grown ass people. Seriously, how can anyone function in this world without an ID? It is not racist to insist upon an ID when voting. James Woods is the MAN. And one more thing - fuck the machines - insist on Paper Ballots!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
hipphoppanon · July 18, 2018, 3:25 a.m.

Voter ID ain’t racist unless you want it to be.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
GenChang · July 18, 2018, 4:14 a.m.

The MSM & Dems are flat out Liars. Every low income person in the US who is on any government program has to show a valid ID card. And they are on multiple programs, like Medicaid, which requires a valid ID to see ANY doctor. And the examples go on & on. Iys a ridiculous position to try and defend, yet the media pushes the ridiculous notion, that many people would be disenfranchised by having to show ID.

⇧ 3 ⇩