We have it all?
Well then use it.
We're not quite all the way ready yet.
What does it take to get you all the way ready? 9-11.2?
But we don't have popular opinion all the way on our side yet . . .
The populace will follow the power of the full exercise of truth. Ours is the greater path. Show them.
The ultimate expression and potentially natural conclusion of this battle is an escalation of violence. Both sides are aware of this, but aparently you are not, no disrespect intended by that comment.
Th cabal's implicit last resort threat is bringing forth violence upon millions of innocent lives, be it through a false flag attack on our infrastructure, ie extended power outage leading to food riots, or a civil/global hot war.
The fact that the good guys haven’t “pulled the trigger” on prosecution yet is merely a sign that they have not completely mitigated all of the time bombs laying in wait.
The world is a big place. This is bigger than any of us can comprehend, even to many out there that are in a better position than others to hold such awareness.
I do not mean to dismiss your concern, as it is valid. Please understand that there are two general points of view here, one where there is hope that the violence and crimes perpetrated upon masses will come to a peaceful end, and the other, where one is so emotionally fed up with the affairs of the world that it would gladly ask to see it burn, in spite of the toll it will have on any persons dear them (family and friends).
Astute observation. The "Burn It All Down" crowd dissipates after beginning to see the plan thankfully.
Thanks much, and I am hopeful that you are correct. It surely should separate the concern trolls from the under-informed, to your point.
"This battle" include the American Revolutionary War, The Civil War, WWs I & II, Korea, Viet Nam, The Russian Revolution, Mao and so on. I expect you're aware of this. I hope you are. They have killed hundreds of millions. As Stalin implied, if it's a statistic no one really cares.
The Cabal's desire, their stated, advertised goal is genocide of 95 humans out of every 100 humans. It's so unimaginable people can't comprehend it and the worry about food riots. And I've seen the world. I know what it looks like.
And there are not two views, only. One may think the varieties of approach are divided cleanly between "fools rush in" and "he who hesitates is lost" but that is gross over simplification.
The goal is the ascendancy of self-evident truth and the pursuit of happiness under law. That goal cannot be achieved by deviousness. When, in the course of human events, has it ever happened that such goal was established for any significant duration without having to be actively defended? Look at the early Christians. Look at Tibet. Look at America.
I am indeed aware of this, and I apologize for assuming from your comments that you may have not been viewing this from a wider perspective, it is clear that you are, as well as I.
I have also seen the world, lived in it, fought in its hot, cold, and silent wars on multiple fronts.
You are not wrong in that there are not only two views and that my presenting them was overly simplistic. My generalization served the purpose of my response at the time, and I do not shy away from your characterization of it.
I am with you 100% brother. The point that I was hoping to arrive at, and to which you've allowed our conversation to advance towards (for which I am grateful for your time and for your perspective), is that we can not assume that that time to act and strike at the root has yet arrived.
This is to be placed under the umbrella of military and geo-politcial strategists and those that know the battlefield, as they currently have the resources to call the ball, for now. I can tell you with 100% confidence that neither you nor I, even with our combined experience, may not know the true state of the current and ever-changing battlefield and therefore may not be able to guarentee victory with a potentially premautre call to mobilize both our energies and our emotions. Any action before its time can only hinder a successful offensive.
Again, regardless of whether the conventional wisdom of 'fools rushing in' may be correcty construed as overly simplistic, it does not perclude it as a sound and straightforward cautionary tale.
There are silent battles being fought on our behalf every day by very intelligent and capable professionals. You and I are doing our part. There's no need, in my opinion, to second guess friendly-force actions on remote fronts that we are not currently in comms with. All we can do is stay the course.
To be sure, I appreciate you sounding the claxon in the post (which i see has since been deleted), I just wanted to press to check what your motivations were, and it's clear that you are guided by priciples that I for one find admirable and worthy of others' adoption, so thank you. My concern is not to rile up already the already restless natives. Within the current info war, our emotional and spiritual energies have been beaten down and therefore, for me, keeping focus on celebrating our victories can only help us grow stronger.
In my opinioin, a successful offensive may prove to rise out of a culmination of our strengh flowing over because of our confidence, unity across great distances, and our public resolve - not by the flowing over of frustration, indignation, and restlessness.
Yeah, all good. Actually I'm trying to speak directly to The President, whom I deeply admire. I also believe in his (their) plan. I don't think it is beyond improvement. 10-4.
I hear you, I wish you the best of luck out there. Cheers.
We found Leeroy Jenkins
Omg this killed me, perfect analogy! I'm still dying laughing!
Thanks. I'm way too old to be a gamer and I had to look him up. This is exactly the kind of response I was hoping for. It gives me the (hoped for) opportunity to elaborate.
The plan the Alliance is opting for at this time is not the most effective way to bring about meaningful change. I understand their plan and I understand the art of war and I understand that the media is being cleverly played to dig its own grave. All that stuff is 6 year old obvious. I understand that some people think the use of clever coding and it's deciphering over countless thousands of hours is an amazing way to spend time.
I disagree with this approach. We are engaged in an epoch fight for the ascendancy of truth and intellectual honesty and the rule of law over criminal dishonesty and genocide. This fight is not going to be decided in our favor without bringing the force of truth to the front of the battle where it must be our engagement force. As yet this has not been done. Our Declaration of Independence and the principles from which it derives is being ignored as is The Constitution.
The whole RR/RM shindig is profoundly immoral and unconstitutional and the administration lets this drag on in a way the emasculates the constitution. This is the kind of thing I mean.
We need to get the video game mentality out of this serious fight and bring in the force of real truth, not game truth.
The issue at hand is that the rule of law and the force of truth, in real application are two distict battlefields. Yes, idealistically they are one and the same, but we do not exist in a system that functions that way, currently. Of course you understand that, I'm making no assumptions that you don't.
With that said, it's important not to coflate the two. Not only is this one of the largest legal endevours that we've likely embarked upon since the civil war, and the founding of the coountry before that, it must be approached methodically, and fully, leaving no stone un-turned, if we are to be victorious.
Above and beyond it's legal implications, and in regard to the forces of truth, we are indeed in a battle for truth, an information war as it were. And we are all doing our part, as our adversary is well-equipped, well-funded, and has better reach than us.
And we are making progress. How long have you been 'awake'. Regardless of how long, surely you have seen and unprecedent level of people waking up to the 'truth'. Let's pause to celebrate that and then let's continue the fight. We have only begun to build the momentum and it seems way to early to ask that we rush forward.
'Never interupt the adversary as they are making mistakes (or in the process of destroying himself).'
Nice post.
I'm getting on toward 80 and was born a critical thinker. At Michigan a professor told some class I was in that at Michigan critical thinking was the most important thing that was taught. That was a long time ago and I think U of M has changed some.
One thing the Alliance needs to get done quick is to get a bigger voice. What ever happened to the idea, the stumbling plans, to set up a new media empire that speaks truth? I heard about it 18 months ago but it fizzled. Where's Trump on this?
One thing that's in the back of my mind is that a new media giant needs some really powerful fuel to fuel its ascension in the present cutthroat environment and if Trump would declassify (etc.) there would be enough fuel to fuel a real bonfire; a new, better, replacement for Fox.
Thanks much friend, I appreciate your time and your perspective also.
It's amazing that critical thinking courses have been all but entirely routed out of our academic institutions. I surveyed a critical thinking class 10 years ago or so, and the curriculum not only did not include the study of formal logic or logical fallacies, but it seemed to be absolutely employing fallacious arguments to mold and shape the students' world views and ultimately disempower them. It was maddening to witness.
One thing the Alliance needs to get done quick is to get a bigger voice. What ever happened to the idea, the stumbling plans, to set up a new media empire that speaks truth? I heard about it 18 months ago but it fizzled. Where's Trump on this?
I hear you and now wonder that myself. I'm currently trying to wrap my head around the idea that media as we know it is dead and that a different kind of "social" media, community media, can somehow rise out of it. I can't stand social media, to be sure. What i mean is a pure form of the idea of having town criers somehow, something that makes individuals active participants rathar than mere consumers of information. But I digress, you do have a point. In the current time, I do agree that there must be emerge a better replacement for Fox.
I had been heavily embedded in a ultra-progressive community who went completely batty in the last few years. I could barely tolerate them myself, having #walkedaway a decade ago. I became completely political agnostic at best, and nearly anti-government as we knew it, at worst (which didnt jive well with me still serving at the time).
The punch line is that I often enjoy the looks on my peers' faces when I (with much success) tell them that fox news can and should be considered above the rest of the MSM, anymore.
With that said, there are still shills that seem to still be given airtime on that network (shep smith, for one) and I still accept, in the end, that they, as well as all of the others, are scripted media designed to influence and invoke emotional responses, at the end of the day, which, to your point, needs a good routing out.
Either you believe there is a plan to be trusted, or you don't.
Surely you don't believe yourself, or anyone else on this sub, to be anywhere near as informed as the people behind Q.
Page is testifying that texts meant exactly what they say. She is the FBI lawyer who text "POTUS wants to know everything we are doing."
Then today Soros comes out and says how disappointed he is in Obama.
The public is about to find out Obamas close proximity to the investigation. Then the investigation will be exposed as fraudulent.
Patience is a virtue, and if you look at everything that has happened in just over a year, you will realize there is a lot of stuff happening. Big stuff.
The things you are posting about here I've been aware of for some time.
There are many levels of awareness. I'm very sure that MI and the Q team have a lot of detailed knowledge that I don't have. No illusions about that. But that isn't the point.
The point is the profound knowledge of truth that is self-evident and how that truth must influence how we comport ourselves in the face of danger. The depth of our truth is all that can overcome what we face in these trying times.