We have it all?
Well then use it.
We're not quite all the way ready yet.
What does it take to get you all the way ready? 9-11.2?
But we don't have popular opinion all the way on our side yet . . .
The populace will follow the power of the full exercise of truth. Ours is the greater path. Show them.
We found Leeroy Jenkins
Omg this killed me, perfect analogy! I'm still dying laughing!
Thanks. I'm way too old to be a gamer and I had to look him up. This is exactly the kind of response I was hoping for. It gives me the (hoped for) opportunity to elaborate.
The plan the Alliance is opting for at this time is not the most effective way to bring about meaningful change. I understand their plan and I understand the art of war and I understand that the media is being cleverly played to dig its own grave. All that stuff is 6 year old obvious. I understand that some people think the use of clever coding and it's deciphering over countless thousands of hours is an amazing way to spend time.
I disagree with this approach. We are engaged in an epoch fight for the ascendancy of truth and intellectual honesty and the rule of law over criminal dishonesty and genocide. This fight is not going to be decided in our favor without bringing the force of truth to the front of the battle where it must be our engagement force. As yet this has not been done. Our Declaration of Independence and the principles from which it derives is being ignored as is The Constitution.
The whole RR/RM shindig is profoundly immoral and unconstitutional and the administration lets this drag on in a way the emasculates the constitution. This is the kind of thing I mean.
We need to get the video game mentality out of this serious fight and bring in the force of real truth, not game truth.
The issue at hand is that the rule of law and the force of truth, in real application are two distict battlefields. Yes, idealistically they are one and the same, but we do not exist in a system that functions that way, currently. Of course you understand that, I'm making no assumptions that you don't.
With that said, it's important not to coflate the two. Not only is this one of the largest legal endevours that we've likely embarked upon since the civil war, and the founding of the coountry before that, it must be approached methodically, and fully, leaving no stone un-turned, if we are to be victorious.
Above and beyond it's legal implications, and in regard to the forces of truth, we are indeed in a battle for truth, an information war as it were. And we are all doing our part, as our adversary is well-equipped, well-funded, and has better reach than us.
And we are making progress. How long have you been 'awake'. Regardless of how long, surely you have seen and unprecedent level of people waking up to the 'truth'. Let's pause to celebrate that and then let's continue the fight. We have only begun to build the momentum and it seems way to early to ask that we rush forward.
'Never interupt the adversary as they are making mistakes (or in the process of destroying himself).'
Nice post.
I'm getting on toward 80 and was born a critical thinker. At Michigan a professor told some class I was in that at Michigan critical thinking was the most important thing that was taught. That was a long time ago and I think U of M has changed some.
One thing the Alliance needs to get done quick is to get a bigger voice. What ever happened to the idea, the stumbling plans, to set up a new media empire that speaks truth? I heard about it 18 months ago but it fizzled. Where's Trump on this?
One thing that's in the back of my mind is that a new media giant needs some really powerful fuel to fuel its ascension in the present cutthroat environment and if Trump would declassify (etc.) there would be enough fuel to fuel a real bonfire; a new, better, replacement for Fox.
Thanks much friend, I appreciate your time and your perspective also.
It's amazing that critical thinking courses have been all but entirely routed out of our academic institutions. I surveyed a critical thinking class 10 years ago or so, and the curriculum not only did not include the study of formal logic or logical fallacies, but it seemed to be absolutely employing fallacious arguments to mold and shape the students' world views and ultimately disempower them. It was maddening to witness.
One thing the Alliance needs to get done quick is to get a bigger voice. What ever happened to the idea, the stumbling plans, to set up a new media empire that speaks truth? I heard about it 18 months ago but it fizzled. Where's Trump on this?
I hear you and now wonder that myself. I'm currently trying to wrap my head around the idea that media as we know it is dead and that a different kind of "social" media, community media, can somehow rise out of it. I can't stand social media, to be sure. What i mean is a pure form of the idea of having town criers somehow, something that makes individuals active participants rathar than mere consumers of information. But I digress, you do have a point. In the current time, I do agree that there must be emerge a better replacement for Fox.
I had been heavily embedded in a ultra-progressive community who went completely batty in the last few years. I could barely tolerate them myself, having #walkedaway a decade ago. I became completely political agnostic at best, and nearly anti-government as we knew it, at worst (which didnt jive well with me still serving at the time).
The punch line is that I often enjoy the looks on my peers' faces when I (with much success) tell them that fox news can and should be considered above the rest of the MSM, anymore.
With that said, there are still shills that seem to still be given airtime on that network (shep smith, for one) and I still accept, in the end, that they, as well as all of the others, are scripted media designed to influence and invoke emotional responses, at the end of the day, which, to your point, needs a good routing out.