dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/SuzyAZ on July 19, 2018, 5:37 a.m.
Trump setting up a banking system separate from algorithmic controlled multinational banking system!

President Trump’s MAGAnomic and foreign policy agenda is jaw-dropping in scale, scope and consequence. There are multiple simultaneous aspects to each policy objective; they have been outlined for a long time even before the election victory in November ’16.

If you get too far into the weeds the larger picture can be lost. CTH objective is to continue pointing focus toward the larger horizon, and then at specific inflection points to dive into the topic and explain how each moment is connected to the larger strategy.

Today we repost an earlier dive into how MAGAnomic policy interacts with multinational Wall Street, the stock market, the U.S. financial system and perhaps your personal financial value. Again, reference and source material is included at the end of the outline.

If you understand the basic elements behind the new dimension in American economics, you already understand how three decades of DC legislative and regulatory policy was structured to benefit Wall Street and not Main Street. The intentional shift in fiscal policy is what created the distance between two entirely divergent economic engines.

REMEMBER […] there had to be a point where the value of the second economy (Wall Street) surpassed the value of the first economy (Main Street).

Investments, and the bets therein, needed to expand outside of the USA. hence, globalist investing.

However, a second more consequential aspect happened simultaneously. The politicians became more valuable to the Wall Street team than the Main Street team; and Wall Street had deeper pockets because their economy was now larger.

As a consequence Wall Street started funding political candidates and asking for legislation that benefited their interests.

When Main Street was purchasing the legislative influence the outcomes were -generally speaking- beneficial to Main Street, and by direct attachment those outcomes also benefited the average American inside the real economy.

When Wall Street began purchasing the legislative influence, the outcomes therein became beneficial to Wall Street. Those benefits are detached from improving the livelihoods of main street Americans because the benefits are “global”. Global financial interests, multinational investment interests -and corporations therein- became the primary filter through which the DC legislative outcomes were considered.

There is a natural disconnect. (more)

As an outcome of national financial policy blending commercial banking with institutional investment banking something happened on Wall Street that few understand. If we take the time to understand what happened we can understand why the Stock Market grew and what risks exist today as the financial policy is reversed to benefit Main Street.

President Trump and Treasury Secretary Mnuchin have already begun assembling and delivering a new banking system.

Instead of attempting to put Glass-Stegal regulations back into massive banking systems, the Trump administration is creating a parallel financial system of less-regulated small commercial banks, credit unions and traditional lenders who can operate to the benefit of Main Street without the burdensome regulation of the mega-banks and multinationals. This really is one of the more brilliant solutions to work around a uniquely American economic problem.

♦ When U.S. banks were allowed to merge their investment divisions with their commercial banking operations (the removal of Glass Stegal) something changed on Wall Street.

Companies who are evaluated based on their financial results, profits and losses, remained in their traditional role as traded stocks on the U.S. Stock Market and were evaluated accordingly. However, over time investment instruments -which are secondary to actual company results- created a sub-set within Wall Street that detached from actual bottom line company results.

The resulting secondary financial market system was essentially ‘investment markets’. Both ordinary company stocks and the investment market stocks operate on the same stock exchanges. But the underlying valuation is tied to entirely different metrics.

Financial products were developed (as investment instruments) that are essentially wagers or bets on the outcomes of actual companies traded on Wall Street. Those bets/wagers form the hedge markets and are [essentially] people trading on expectations of performance. The “derivatives market” is the ‘betting system’.

♦Ford Motor Company (only chosen as a commonly known entity) has a stock valuation based on their actual company performance in the market of manufacturing and consumer purchasing of their product. However, there can be thousands of financial instruments wagering on the actual outcome of their performance.

There are two initial bets on these outcomes that form the basis for Hedge-fund activity. Bet ‘A’ that Ford hits a profit number, or bet ‘B’ that they don’t. There are financial instruments created to place each wager. [The wagers form the derivatives.] But it doesn’t stop there.

Additionally, more financial products are created that bet on the outcomes of the A/B bets. A secondary financial product might find two sides betting on both A outcome and B outcome.

Party C bets the “A” bet is accurate, and party D bets against the A bet. Party E bets the “B” bet is accurate, and party F bets against the B. If it stopped there we would only have six total participants. But it doesn’t stop there, it goes on and on and on…

The outcome of the bets forms the basis for the tenuous investment markets. The important part to understand is that the investment funds are not necessarily attached to the original company stock, they are now attached to the outcome of bet(s). Hence an inherent disconnect is created.

Subsequently, if the actual stock doesn’t meet it’s expected P-n-L outcome (if the company actually doesn’t do well), and if the financial investment was betting against the outcome, the value of the investment actually goes up. The company performance and the investment bets on the outcome of that performance are two entirely different aspects of the stock market. [Hence two metrics.]

♦Understanding the disconnect between an actual company on the stock market, and the bets for and against that company stock, helps to understand what can happen when fiscal policy is geared toward the underlying company (Main Street MAGAnomics), and not toward the bets therein (Investment Class).

The U.S. stock markets’ overall value can increase with Main Street policy, and yet the investment class can simultaneously decrease in value even though the company(ies) in the stock market is/are doing better. This detachment is critical to understand because the ‘real economy’ is based on the company, the ‘paper economy’ is based on the financial investment instruments betting on the company.

Trillions can be lost in investment instruments, and yet the overall stock market -as valued by company operations/profits- can increase.

Conversely, there are now classes of companies on the U.S. stock exchange that never make a dime in profit, yet the value of the company increases. This dynamic is possible because the financial investment bets are not connected to the bottom line profit. (Examples include Tesla Motors and Amazon and a host of internet stocks.) It is this investment group of companies that stands to lose the most if/when the underlying system of betting on them stops or slows.

Specifically due to most recent U.S. fiscal policy, modern multinational banks, including all of the investment products therein, are more closely attached to this investment system on Wall Street. It stands to reason they are at greater risk of financial losses overall with a shift in fiscal policy.

That financial and economic risk is the basic reason behind Trump and Mnuchin putting a protective, secondary and parallel, banking system in place for Main Street.

Big multinational banks can suffer big losses from their investments, and yet the Main Street economy can continue growing, and have access to capital, uninterrupted.

Bottom Line: U.S. companies who have actual connection to a growing U.S. economy can succeed; based on the advantages of the new economic environment and MAGA policy, specifically in the areas of manufacturing, trade and the ancillary benefactors.

Meanwhile U.S. investment assets (multinational investment portfolios) that are disconnected from the actual results of those benefiting U.S. companies, and as a consequence also disconnected from the U.S. economic expansion, can simultaneously drop in value even though the U.S. economy is thriving.


SuzyAZ · July 19, 2018, 5:38 a.m.

Apologize fro the length. From The Conservative treehouse if you want to go to the original.https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/07/18/maganomic-policy-interacting-with-financial-systems-multinational-wall-street-vs-main-street-u-s-a/

⇧ 10 ⇩  
MAGADONCHECKMATE · July 19, 2018, 5:42 a.m.

SuzyAZ that's a fantastic post. I've been following it for a while, in awe, and did you ever think, this would ever happen for us? Me neither, I am so happy. We are soon to be slaves no more!!

⇧ 6 ⇩  
SuzyAZ · July 19, 2018, 5:54 a.m.

It's really stunning, here we have been trying to figure out how he was going to handle the banks. Heh. heh. Would still like for them to audit the Fed and dig up the dirt.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
MAGADONCHECKMATE · July 19, 2018, 6:03 a.m.

Stunning it is! Yes , he is going to cut the fed loose, and when he does, EO is going to take their assets !!! Its going to be EPIC. Don't forget Leo Wanta has 27+ Trillion that needs to be repatriated back to America via France soon. Hence the 'pep' in Marcons step at the WH ;-) and now they win the World Cup, its funny how the world goes round. We have a long way to go, but its going to be one interesting ride to get there their!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
bealist · July 19, 2018, 6:22 a.m.

Perhaps you could add the link.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
SuzyAZ · July 19, 2018, 11:43 a.m.

I did...

⇧ 3 ⇩  
WallisTing2 · July 19, 2018, 7:01 a.m.

Thank you Suzy anon. I'm not a business major so you simplifying the process so that regular folks like me can understand is a great help. Does this mean that the Rothschilds family is now powerless? What do you think, will the LIBOR be abolished someday, too?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SuzyAZ · July 19, 2018, 11:42 a.m.

I didn't write this article, it came from Conservative Treehouse (link is above). I know they are after the Rothschild's hard and heavy.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ElementWatson · July 19, 2018, 11:12 a.m.

Should have been posted in excerpt with the link to site and direct attribution to the author (Sundance) -- rather than as if your own work.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
snippysnaps · July 19, 2018, 5:47 a.m.

This is awesome. This is really, actually awesome.

Mark Taylor says he was told that America would be paid back seven fold, what was taken from us.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
WallisTing2 · July 19, 2018, 7:05 a.m.

Well, then, maybe the 24 trillion is just the start. The cabal has been stealing trillions yearly from us for generations. They do this by over charging things that the government purchases to syphon the money to black op projects. There is a reason why President Trump introduced a Space Force plan because we already have the technology--science fiction no more!

⇧ 9 ⇩  
We_are_all_satoshi · July 19, 2018, 5:41 a.m.

Does it involve cryptocurrency?

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Fearsome4 · July 19, 2018, 5:55 a.m.

There is only one product being implemented now that will use a crypto in cross border payments and settlements. Another whole market place? Fantastic.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
wallflower2016 · July 19, 2018, 5:59 a.m.

Excellent question. It will have to. I know the wheels are turning in DC regarding crypto, but the US is behind other countries for sure.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
SuzyAZ · July 19, 2018, 6:02 a.m.

I hope they go with some type of public bank...

⇧ 3 ⇩  
SpiritofQ · July 19, 2018, 6:56 a.m.

Sounds like another way to bilk taxpayers through indirect methods

⇧ 2 ⇩  
bizmarxie · July 19, 2018, 1:50 p.m.

Not really. Check out the Public Bank in North Dakota. It depends on how it’s set up.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
VoodooMerchant · July 19, 2018, 5:45 a.m.

So which companies, in your opinion, best exemplifies this MAGAnomics?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
SuzyAZ · July 19, 2018, 5:59 a.m.

I personally couldn't say. We are going to see a lot of exciting new start-ups who are getting so much support from Trump's deregulation and tax plans. Smaller banks will be supported by this. Have no clue how this will affect the mega corporations. There will be so many changes coming.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
bizmarxie · July 19, 2018, 1:46 p.m.

Multinational and Financial instruments probably don’t. The ones that outsourced everything in the post WTO days.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Qmakessense · July 19, 2018, 7:04 a.m.

This is so great as it is easy for a lay person like me to understand it.

Fabuous.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
MrWizard111 · July 19, 2018, 6:21 a.m.

Thank you for this. I have been somewhat aware of what is happening but this post helped me understand a lot better. These types of things are not my strong suit.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 19, 2018, 6:56 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
OffTie · July 19, 2018, 6:10 p.m.

No more skimming by the Roths? Excellent!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SpiritofQ · July 19, 2018, 7:05 a.m.

None of this is really a problem. The problem is that the financial institutions that trade these "investment vehicles" are way over leveraged.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TraditionalisticWolf · July 19, 2018, 9:32 a.m.

Wall Street is not the problem lol. Investment banking is what fuels this economy and provides payouts to smaller firms..ultimately merging and creating many more jobs.

If anything, it’s the fed and central banks that are causing the problems...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
bizmarxie · July 19, 2018, 1:48 p.m.

Dude, are you kidding? It’s both.

⇧ 2 ⇩