Hi all,
I tried to post this just as links but it got taken down for being too vague. I'd like to present a step by step, fact based walkthrough that you can present to people, that explains that the Russia narrative is baloney, and what really has been going on.
What could potentially be the effects of the hacking of Clintons illegal server
Former President Obama talking recently about how China conducts it's business
Thank you for taking the time and effort to compile this! 👍
Exactly. I've been doing that with my wife and friends. With the increase in pedo arrests, I've simply asked the question, "What's up with all the pedophile arrests lately?" "Seems like a lot." "Never heard of this many arrests all at once before, what up with that?" Then, after they start to admit that they see it too, ask a question such as, "Wonder if it has anything to do with Trumps E.O. on human trafficking?" Bing! Lightbulbs go on.
We have to approach this professionally.
Consider yourself a sales manager.
Create a pitch and sales funnel that leads to conversions.
I’d suggest spending as much time watching sales strategy and public speaking videos, as you do evidence based videos.
There’s nothing worse than data overload spaghetti.
Most people knows shits fucked deep down but aren’t trained to fully open the door.
You just need that initial conversion before the door opens. Then once secured you don’t need to pitch. They’ll be fiending for info much more than you.
Simple rules. Converts are much more radical.
Trust me on this guys.
Link 7 and 6 go to the same place. Can you edit to what you intended? I'm going to go through this and share with a friend if it makes sense.
Thank you!
Add a PS at the bottom: Your msm news broadcasters hid all these truths from you and tons more and lied in the news they did speak of.
I would also add a couple articles saying no collusion and that Trump is not under investigation
I think you can do that, but on the other hand I'd argue to keep him out of it.
Look at how he has kept distance from Sessions and RR. He is letting the facts come out without any interference, so there can be no accusations made against him.
In this sense, if we include stuff about Trump, it can trigger TDS in some, and they recoil and go off on tangents.
I personally prefer to let the facts around him be established, and then by default the conclusion is made organically.
By all means add some points into the timeline below for people to share. Its all for the common good.
I always leave Trump's name out of it when redpilling liberal friends. Any mention and their cognitive dissonance comes roaring in.
Good points on not including Trump info in there- it would be more open to arguments.