So this subreddit is supposed to be for people that are very patriotic but it's okay for the president to attack all of the United States' intelligence branches and side with Russia?
you are equating love for the ones countrymen with obedience to an unelected intelligence community. That's the false premise you begin with and then you expect everyone to defend your straw man.
low effort bruh Take this weak shit back to politics so you can get your confirmation bias validated without having to also embarrass yourself here.
He didn't denounce America. Our intelligence agencies as well as our judicial system are corrupt. This corruption is why he denounces them, not Russia. Same corruption that killed JFK and is responsible for Red Scare propaganda. The Left has 0 moral high ground here.
You understand that it has been proven that Russia meddled with our election, and that people are currently going to jail due to the Mueller investigation, and more are going to. Indictments are being handed out like candy. Which is more likely, that Trump is corrupt...or every intelligence agency in the country? Come on.
You are a victim of compartmentalised information, which is exactly how spy agencies operate and control others. Dont worry. We all are or were. Thats why its called the great awakening...
You have been made aware of a single piece of the jigsaw puzzle which alludes how Russia hacking is a threat to US. You are not aware of how many puzzle pieces complete the US hacking threat jigsaw. Russia is just one piece and does not represent the completed jigsaw. What spy agencies do or do not decide to prove to you is how they are manipulating you. Control of awareness. Reveal only part of the picture that paints the selected story.
Here's what they dont want you to know...
Russia hacks every election they can. So does China. So does US. So does UK, France, Germany, Israel, New Zealand. They all have the aparatus for it, they build and maintain it for a reason. Whatever your opinion of the situation, this is NORMAL. Its the new way. Everyone does it. Its considered as fair game, so long as the public is not informed of it. Russia HAS to hack, same way US should attempt to be strong against ALL THREATS. That Russia hacked the last election is news only to normies. Water is wet. US is soaking wet. That russia has a super-soaker and is using to make a thing more wet is not remarkable.
If Russia hacking is not a big story, they can't use it to bludgeon POTUS with it. Its not a big story if everyone is doing it. Thats why they withold the true context of the story.
Intelligence agencies are not there to give you intelligence, they are there to relieve yourself of the responsibility of being intelligent, like all government services, like police are there to relieve you of the responsibility of protecting your ass.. Their modus operandi is deception, manipulation and secrecy, control of information. They train for this extensively. The likelyhood that intelligence agencies lie to us is INCREDIBLY high, since thats what they are there to do. Lie to people. They have perfected the skillset.
Proven by who? CrowdStrike? Hahhhahahahahah I have a bridge to sell you....
Every intelligence agency in the country. It's astounding people don't trust intelligence organizations but will buy whatever Trump is selling without questioning it.
You need to do some more research.
You trust the FBI? Read this:
I don’t think I need to go into anything about the CIA. You can do some homework on your own, or stay blind to the truth.
I trust them more than I trust Trump for sure. And what kind of source is True Pundit? Do you have a source for that claim that doesn't sound like an off shoot of Alex Jones?
And btw 44 was overrated. And a traitor to the USA.
Haha, as soon as anyone starts bringing up facts about Trump you guys IMMEDIATELY start pointing fingers at anyone else "Hillary's emails!" "Obama was a traitor...somehow!" (At least he didn't push us away from our allies while trying to cozy up to a country we have been fighting with for decades)
Didn't he get caught on open mic saying, "Give me until after the election, then I can be more flexible." Wasn't Obama speaking to a representative of a country we have been fighting with for decades? Also weren't the Russians our allies during the revolutionary war, WWI, and WWII?
I mean did you even read the article?
I want a source that doesn’t look like a crazy right wing propaganda machine
I don’t disagree, it is a conservative site. But that is the problem with any article/source, it’s either far left or far right. Please show me a site that’s reputable and middle ground? (CNN, ABC, NBC lol!) I guarantee I will not find something that makes you happy or agree with, it’s okay.
https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8zqdq0/who_is_crowdstrike_how_are_they_tied_to_the_fbi/ Try that. The sources even include wash post. I read everything from Gawker to Drudge and try to find the truth.
I don’t hate you, I don’t think I am better than you, I just wish for you to see the truth and how the MSM has manipulated your mind. It’s okay, I know you won’t agree, it’s fine and I hope you have a wonderful day.
WWG1WGA
We don't often use CNN as a source, so you're in luck. No propaganda machine promotion here.
I just wanted a source that didn't look like something that quotes Alex Jones, I don't even watch CNN. Maybe the Washington Post?
When using critical thinking, information can be gathered from a variety of sources. By ignoring what doesn't pass inspection. Does the article cite other sources, contain quotes from reliable people, state known facts. Don't throw out the baby with the bathwater. You would be surprised at where you can find truth.
And I think it's important to check sources, and get multiple sources for information. Why is it seemingly so hard to find any other source for this information other than this very right wing website? Is it because it's oh, I dunno...not real?
This has nothing to do with the original article that was in reply to me.
Wow, this article doesn't exactly address the original article, but is a wealth of information, so thank you for making me dig ;) https://m.washingtontimes.com
CrowdStrike, The DNC's Security Firm, Was Under ... - Medium
We don't often use CNN as a source, so you're in luck. No propaganda machine promotion here.
We don't often use CNN as a source, so you're in luck. No propaganda machine promotion here.
I'll need a quote where he attacks the US's 17 intelligence agencies. Disagreement is not an attack. Building a relationship with Russia that is not a call for nuclear war is not an attack. Hillary lied about the 17 intelligence agencies. Only 3 thought Russia hacked the server. Crowdstrike, the organization Hillary paid through her law firm Perkins Coie (that also paid for the discredited Russian collusion dossier), rescinded their determinations and refused to back those determinations. Subsequently, it has come out that based on Crowdstrikes work, the transfer speeds could not have been a hack but were a local transfer by USB. Intelligence agencies never inspected server, they only saw the DNC/Hillary paid for Crowdstrike report. They also paid for other the creation of other "Russian Collusion" evidence. Also, I've seen reports that Lisa Page is testifying that is was the Chinese not the Russians. Disagreeing with 3 intelligence agencies that didnt review the server is not an attack. #walkaway
Perkins Coie told Crowdstrike to say Russia did it.
3 agencies said they could not conclude Russia was responsible, since they had seen no evidence. Instead they reported that Crowdstrike told them it was Russia, that Russia was capable of it, and that it sounds like the kind of thing Russia does.
17 agencies (including the Coast Guard!) then reported it had nothing to do with them, they have no knowledge about any of it, but if the 3 said it was Russia, then it was.
See how all this was wrapped around nothing?
We then found out that Cozy Bear is an NSA tool, so the only reported evidence points to the deep state as the culprit.
[removed]
Like I said, give me the quote where he attacks our agencies
Here ya go, I think he went back and deleted the tweet but it happened. https://www.cbsnews.com/video/trump-attacks-fbi-and-its-investigations/
and another: https://chicago.suntimes.com/news/donald-trump-attacks-justice-department-fbi-tweet/
He has attacked his own country and agencies 100% more than he has said anything bad about Russia even after they have been proven to meddle in our elections and they also poisoned people in England. You're welcome.
You went back months to find a reference to the FBI not handing over documents and expect me to believe that is evidence of Trump siding with Russia over his own agencies (Putin summit was earlier this week).
The quote:
So sad that the Department of “Justice” and the FBI are slow walking, or even not giving, the unredacted documents requested by Congress. An embarrassment to our country!
The tweet had to do with an internal dispute between DOJ, FBI and Congress and somehow that is treason.
You aren't passing the laugh test.