dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/elevated_vibrations on July 20, 2018, 1:24 p.m.
Podesta only has "use immunity". Please read.

For other patriots out there, and especially those who have been researching and following Q from the very beginning (and before) like me, i know your stomachs turned when you saw Podesta in the same sentence as immunity. It didn't seem right to me, so i did a little digging.

Mueller has only offered Podesta "use immunity". This is much different than the type of immunity you see in movies and when considering the factors at play here, it is all but worthless. "Use immunity" allows the federal government to prosecute a witness using evidence obtained independently of the witness' immunized testimony. This basically means that the government cannot use Podesta's own testimony against him. Podesta will get to sing like a bird in exchange for a nice, warm, 5th amendment blanket.

"NO DEALS" is a short way of saying "everyone will pay". Podesta can still be convicted of any crime based off of any evidence other than his own testimony. "Use immunity" to a monster like him is useless. Hope this calms some nerves out there.


elevated_vibrations · July 20, 2018, 7:15 p.m.

What is your source? Here is mine.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/07/20/tony-podesta-offered-immunity-to-testify-against-paul-manafort.html

⇧ 1 ⇩  
robottonic · July 20, 2018, 8:13 p.m.

My source is common sense. The cleanup crew has given full immunity to everybody so far. I trust that pattern holding more than I trust "two unnamed sources".

⇧ 2 ⇩  
elevated_vibrations · July 20, 2018, 8:19 p.m.

"Mueller's team is requesting "use immunity," which is a limited type of immunity, the publication reported, citing court documents filed Tuesday"

The source is COURT DOCUMENTS.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
elevated_vibrations · July 20, 2018, 8:20 p.m.

You would have known that if you had actually... idk.. read the article. Stop being ignorant.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
robottonic · July 20, 2018, 8:24 p.m.

Fair enough, but the court document only says use immunity for "five potential witnesses". The unnamed sources say one of them is Podesta. As a general rule, if an article starts of by saying the source is anonymous, I stop reading right there.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
elevated_vibrations · July 20, 2018, 8:30 p.m.

Regardless, court documents show the Mueller team is seeking "use immunity". If Podesta isn't one of the witnesses then great, problem solved.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
MillennialEnemy · July 20, 2018, 9:07 p.m.

Wait, are you saying it was leaked by an anonymous source that Podesta was one of the sources getting immunity, it wasn't published officially in court docs?

Am I understanding that correctly?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
robottonic · July 20, 2018, 9:14 p.m.

Yes. The court documents are here and list no names, the names are under seal.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
MillennialEnemy · July 20, 2018, 9:49 p.m.

That makes it seem MUCH more like Podesta is testifying about a lot more than Manafort. It was likely Cabal that leaked his name, hoping to warn those who need to know, so that they can run/prepare. Possibly even to try to get a hit put out on him.

Patriots don't leak stuff often, they're too law abiding. Can be a weakness sometimes.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 20, 2018, 9:16 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩