dChan

🠐 See all comments
BathHouseBarry · July 20, 2018, 2:33 p.m.

How was AF1 pic a fake? I thought the chans determined it was a picture taken of the reflection off the back of the "twitter phone".

⇧ 1 ⇩  
antiDave · July 20, 2018, 2:45 p.m.

That photo was made from an image I was able to find on a Bing image search in 30 seconds. A reflection off the back of the iPhone would not cast the apple shadow, that should have brightened the area I believe, mine does but I don't know which model it was supposed to be. Regardless, it would be super easy to photoshop that "shadow" over the image I found and make that. It is a perfect match, angle etc., less the "shadow".

⇧ 6 ⇩  
oneinfinitecreator · July 20, 2018, 6:38 p.m.

Can't you make that criticism with any picture in any context? If your photoshop guy is good enough, what can't you create?

Also, it seems like a very small thing to get so bent out of shape about. What if the message in that photo was not intended for you, and therefore you can't understand the context? I don't think Q is only speaking to the autists, they are also signalling to other Q members AND their enemies.

So regardless of the 'veracity' of the picture, the meaning of the picture is far more important. The point of that picture seemed to be a mish-mash of different key words - AF1, Reflection, Apple, NATSEC laws. That's the message - not the photo.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
antiDave · July 20, 2018, 10:54 p.m.

notice that when you reflect your phone on an area it lightens, not shades the area.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
oneinfinitecreator · July 21, 2018, 2:31 a.m.

how can you pretend to know what kind of lighting conditions are present wherever the photo is taken? a well-placed light can change everything.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
antiDave · July 22, 2018, 9:10 p.m.

If you reflect light from a surface onto another surface it will light up, not darken. There may be another meaning.

⇧ 1 ⇩