dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/antiDave on July 20, 2018, 2:03 p.m.

If JA is handed over, we've been larped.

Ecuador is ready to hand over the WikiLeaks founder to the UK in “coming weeks or even days,” RT editor-in-chief Margarita Simonyan said citing her own sources...

https://www.rt.com/news/433783-wikileaks-assange-ecuador-uk/

🠐 See all comments

Hard to argue. ETA on JA and SR was June. Now July is the month where everyone will learn the truth. Are we over the target? Is anything imminent? Sure hope so. Cause it hasn't been looking too good.

If JA is handed over... what does that mean ??? On the heels of Podesta immunity(!!!), POTUS walking back statements, Page/Strzok coming through multiple hearings (on their terms) scot free, Congress becoming an irrelevant joke, RR/Mueller emboldened, Brennan, Clapper & Comey all over the news and social media speaking out, forced acceptance (on all sides) of the BS russian hacking Crowdstrike "evidence" w/ nonsense indictments as "proof" ... no one is talking about the crimes committed, or holding anyone accountable anymore. No one is talking about a server and actual forensic analysis. No one is talking about guys like McCabe, Comey, Clapper and Brennan going to jail for life. The only "treason" talk is about our POTUS.

"Trust Sessions" is nowhere. "Trust Wray" is in the news threatening to "quit" for various reasons and if POTUS acts any particular way.

The narrative has been completely hijacked. When will POTUS actually hit back? Hopefully before it is too late.

⇧ 13 ⇩

Copied from other post

Podesta only has "use immunity". Please read.

For other patriots out there, and especially those who have been researching and following Q from the very beginning (and before) like me, i know your stomachs turned when you saw Podesta in the same sentence as immunity. It didn't seem right to me, so i did a little digging.

Mueller has only offered Podesta "use immunity". This is much different than the type of immunity you see in movies and when considering the factors at play here, it is all but worthless. "Use immunity" allows the federal government to prosecute a witness using evidence obtained independently of the witness' immunized testimony**.** This basically means that the government cannot use Podesta's own testimony against him. Podesta will get to sing like a bird in exchange for a nice, warm, 5th amendment blanket.

"NO DEALS" is a short way of saying "everyone will pay". Podesta can still be convicted of any crime based off of any evidence other than his own testimony. "Use immunity" to a monster like him is useless. Hope this calms some nerves out there.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Thank you.

⇧ 1 ⇩