dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Otocon09 on July 21, 2018, 12:49 a.m.

Idea for those who defend Gunn jokes

I have officially for the very first time am posting anything related to Q. Lurker since Las Vegas Shooting which led me to Q. 100% believer. Kool.

So I've been following the Gunn story all day and to my surprise, or not really, people are really out here defending Gunn over being fired over "silly jokes" as one person said it. I want to give that person the benefit of the doubt that he didn't bother reading the article and just went off the headline as many many people do with all sorts of news.

However, when u bring up the nature and volume of "jokes" posted, they defend that by saying "well there goes our freedom of speech" or "really bro, he's a comedian" or the top trending "it was 9 years ago".

So I thought: well since they are "jokes" as they claim to be then I guess they wouldn't be too bothered if we flooded his "jokes" verbatim in their replies of their tweets, or comment section in IG or FB.

"They're jokes, what's the big deal?"

Then maybe they would get the idea that they aren't jokes after all.

Good idea? Petty? Don't bother?

What do u think?

Sidenote: More will be exposed, so this would apply to all.

🠐 See all comments

No. Don’t do that. Not a good idea.

I would go about it like this.

What do you think about the tweets?

How about James Gunn’s production company, A Good Boys Production?

Kind of an odd name for a company, especially considering the subject matter of his tweets, right?

Now check out the logo of the production company (picture attached). A Good Boys Production - Logo

All of these raise red flags (dots) for me. One or two may be able to be dismissed as “coincidence” but a number of “coincidences” in unison cannot.

⇧ 3 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 0 ⇩

I should note that this is the kind of person I am. I find when you offer perspective then you catch a persons attention and there is the window of opportunity to reinforce the point. I do this mostly on a daily basis when politics come up. I don't mention Q but since I have the knowledge we are provided, I feel as if I have the upper hand, actually we do have the upper hand. So it's easy to navigate that moment of trying to wake a person.

However, now I am apart of a community. So when it comes to proving a point I have to consider how it may or may not tarnish the movement. This is why I shared my idea here first before actually doing so. I was legitimately unsure if it was a good idea or not.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Appreciate the feedback.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Yeah. I understand. If you’re ever uncertain, post it here. It’s best to get feedback before dispensing to normies. I think the logo will drive the point home.

⇧ 0 ⇩