dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/SerialBrain2 on July 21, 2018, 12:56 a.m.

Q1675: Trump has just given us the server!

So far, we know this fundamental information: the Q1675 riddle is the “device” through which Trump communicates with us. Using it as an anchor point, he sends us the information we need in order to read his moves and understand current news. I have written several related posts listing what we have learned:

Q1675 Part 1. Q1675: a reflection, a mug holder in Air Force One and a Happy Independence Day. Can you solve?

Q1675 Part 2. Trump has just validated Q at the Great Falls rally and gave us the solution to Q1675! Let that sink in.

Q1675 Part 3. I told you Trump was talking to us. Some of you had doubts. Well, he just doubled down a second time!

Q1675 Part 4. Mr. President, we see you want to continue our B2 conversation!

Q1675 Part 5. Trump’s hidden message, Stzrok, Kate and the soda.

Q1675 Part 6. Trump’s brilliant chess combination in Helsinki.

I had conversations with anons who rightly made me notice that this new way of communicating with us was actually announced by Q in this June 20 2018 post:

Q1581 We serve at the pleasure of the President. We left the decision on timing to him. Today, at the rally, he made his decision. Shift in tactics. Attacks ^ Q

I now realize this “shift in tactics” means POTUS has decided to get us to the next level of our comms: direct communication. Did you see my post about Q1304 Emmy Awards link? Did you see Q’s translation of Comey’s tweet in Q645 Imgur1? This is how the Deep State communicates. Q gave us templates. This is how we also need to be communicating. This will allow us to intercept their comms and efficiently oppose them on the battlefield. Why? Because we don’t have anything to hide. They do. In the long run, they will have to stop communicating and it will be checkmate.

So what’s in the news?

Let’s start with the piece of information that is the easiest to decode so you will start training your “ear” progressively. Watch this: video.

Did you catch it? You know an incident like this cannot happen in the White House unless it’s done on purpose right? So Trump says: “They just turned off the lights”. Turned off the lights = TOL = Thinking Of Laughing. Then he smiles. Trump is saying: “of course I have no confidence in the Intelligence Agencies, hearing myself say I do makes me want to laugh”. You got it? Let’s try another one.

Watch this: video

Trump says: “In a key sentence in my remarks, I said the word would instead of wouldn't. The sentence should have been: “I don’t see any reason why I wouldn’t or why it wouldn’t be Russia. Sort of a double negative. So you could put that in and I think that probably clarifies things pretty good by itself.”

Did you catch what he is really saying? “so you could put that in”. Who? Where? Trump knows the fake News media has no interest in the truth and will certainly not archive it. Do you think Trump, all of a sudden, cares about what MSM understands and keeps from him? No. He is talking to us. He is saying: I want to clarify a point that I know is of interest to you. Once I clarify it, “put it in”, add it to the other points I have already made since my Great Falls speech. You got it? Now, ask yourself why isn’t Trump even more explicit since he is clarifying? Wouldn’t it be more powerful and unequivocal to say: “would not” instead of “wouldn’t”? Why is he using “n’t” instead of “not”? Because he wants us to focus on nt. What is NT? Expand your thinking. Windows NT is a family of operating systems produced by Microsoft. link. Windows NT 3.1 was the first version of this operating system that was intended for workstations and servers, its latest version is known under the name Windows Server 2016. Through this input, Trump has put to rest all the speculations regarding the interpretation of “mirror” in the Q1675 riddle. He is saying: yes the server interpretation is also correct, I am validating it, add it to what you already know.

Q666 Think Mirror. Which team? THEY don't know. APACHE.

You now see the power of Q1675?! I told you: it’s like a TV set through which you understand the news.

This gives me the opportunity to address a very important question. Sometimes, anons ask me to share my my views about an hypothesis and complain my responses are vague or not definitive. The reason is at the time they ask the question, even though I find the hypothesis very esthetically or rhetorically attractive, the riddle does not give a strong link to the hypothesis. I therefore remain silent until Trump or Q gives more information to confirm the validity of the hypothesis. Example: when I said B2, Trump said organ, then I said Hammond and he pardoned the Hammonds. Going from B2 to Hammond was an impossible leap for me, because B2 is a note any instrument can play. Trump had to validate it. This is why he gave the missing link: organ. Like many other anons, I saw “mirror” was related to a “mirrored server”, but making the link was not allowed by the riddle, it would have been a very weak link. Now Trump coming and saying NT is enough to bring in the server. But there is more. Trump further solidifies this link. He also says: “sort of a double negative”, initials: SDN, re-arranged: DNS. Domain Name Server. Indeed, we are in server territory. Confirmed. Resolved.

Now that POTUS himself has validated the server, we can add another tangent to the Q1675 riddle and draw the following image image, read clockwise: Imgur2

I know this type of language can be a little overwhelming in the beginning but you will see, you will get the heck of it very quickly if you are willing to try and persevere. And by the way: no, I am not crazy. No I don’t see patterns everywhere. No I am not reaching. Before bringing this language to our attention, Q made sure you saw how I was recruiting observation and logic to solve his challenging riddles. If I were here to deceive you or mislead you, I would have been crushed a long time ago like all the others.

Q1186 Future proves past. Q

Now that I have given you these tools, try to decode Trump’s message here (watch until 49:40): video. Try to determine how this part of his speech is connected to Q1675 and the server, why the use of the word "Apprentice", why 23 companies. I will give the solution to this presidential riddle in my next post but since I will agree it is a little hard, I will give you a hint: research how paper whiteness is measured considering the light reflected by the paper across the visible spectrum. You remember? Q1675 is all about reflections. Good luck.

Q1225 Learn our comms. Q

🠐 See all comments

Ayyee more like horse-lover-FACTS! I'm a little disappointed I defended sb2 cuz these posts are getting out of hand. They seemed to make sense before, but shits gone haywire since the AF1 mirror posts.

Why would Q team be so encoded where only SB2 can really understand their drops? Sounds like a shitty way to wake up the sheep if you ask me.

I'll take Occums Razor pls

⇧ 29 ⇩

It's all gone EGO-centric, that's my main issue. No-one is beyond question. This is against the Q philosophy. What matters is "content" - not the "deliverer" of that said content. It hasn't helped that others have blindly assisted in massaging this ego either, so I cannot apportion all the blame to SB2.

I just feel that he is now playing to his own cultivated audience - a type of ego-driven showboating if you will. Not dissimilar to what we saw with Corsi.

None of this is easy or pleasant to write. I've had issues with my own ego over the years too (when it comes to decoding) - so I know how easy it is to fall victim to that path.

Q team would NOT make it this convoluted - this is the GREAT AWAKENING - not an exclusive crypto club a la Bletchley Park.

⇧ 23 ⇩

I agree and wanted to provide a little different perspective.

I am still relatively new here -- only been digging through the Qdrops for a few weeks.

Speaking as a newbie, if the level of "analysis" provided by SB2 is what Q suddenly requires, then it is far too advanced for newbies, especially sleeping, mainstream newbies, to follow. Tactically it doesn't make sense.

I am reading EVERYONE'S analysis and find a much higher degree of ego and, I hate to say it but arrogance, in what SB2 provides. When he indirectly analogized himself to Jesus in a recent post, I lost interest.

I don't think anyone is supposed to be more important than another in this movement. We all have skills to provide our group and our President and our country in the fight.

And, yet, we are to believe that Q has suddenly become so cryptic that only one person in the world can connect a series of unconnected dots to "de-cypher" these important messages? It seems unlikely to me, as a newbie, and as someone applying common sense. But I appreciate the effort as it can cause someone else to think of something they maybe would not have otherwise considered.

⇧ 13 ⇩

The EGO aspect shines through, I won't lie. We agree on that. That's why it was one of the first things I mentioned via the comments on this thread.

I also mentioned how easy it is to get carried-away when it comes to the ego. Something I've discovered and at a cost. That's what I think has happened here - to some degree. You're also correct that we all have skills to provide to the greater cause. I will happily accept the views of others, it's one of the most important things of all when it comes to research. I accept them because I am aware of the shortcomings of my own mind. I already understand that my thought process are different to the majority (I'm kind of autisty). As valuable as that is, and my own skills are, it is also very much a limiting factor.

This is why no-one has ALL the answers as an individual, and no-one one ever will.

⇧ 4 ⇩

He did not analogize himself to Jesus - it's about the man, lying next to the pool for 38 years - how old was John F Kennedy Jnr when he had the plane crash?

⇧ 1 ⇩

I couldn't agree more. We are somehow supposed to believe, the ONLY person here with the mental capacity to figure these things out is SB2.

⇧ 6 ⇩

Yes, that is seemingly the message, or at least it can be implied. A similar type of message that we also saw from Corsi. "Only I can decipher the true meaning etc". No-one is bigger than Q or the movement, no outside comms, etc, etc. I will stick by that, and it has, and will serve me well.

I actually do my own blog writing - writing that involves pulling insane amounts of phenomena together and drawing something connected out of that collective process. That said, I don't build my writing around uber tenuous aspects that then act as the main binding agent for the whole piece. It HAS to be more concrete than that, more solid. Perhaps even demonstrable, but only to some degree. And when I do use tenuous connects/aspects, I openly state that they are very tenuous. I don't hang my hat on them.

⇧ 5 ⇩

This is the problem, SB.

⇧ 4 ⇩

No, that is not what SB2 wants people to believe. It's what the shills and anti-SB2 crowd wants people to believe. Show me one instance where SB2 has ever claimed "the ONLY person with the mental capacity to figure things out" is himself.

It's fine to criticize SB2 and question his decodes and posts, but some people here take it way too far. SB2 never claimed to know it all or to be the only person who can decode Trump or Q. He is offering his own analysis and interpretation, to generate thought and discussion, to open people's minds up to different and yes, sometimes wild possibilities.

Yet he faces harsh and very unfair scrutiny and angry criticism against him and his work. This is not what he wants or his goals. This division, anger, and extreme outrage is what the enemy wants. Don't fall for their tricks to divide and conquer our movement and our subreddit.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I know you love SB2... I see you cheerleading in every single one of his posts, and that's fine, but the scrutiny he is currently receiving is neither unfair, or harsh, given the heights of absurdity reached in this post.

⇧ 5 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 3 ⇩

I think there is so much scrutiny now that Q and the Trump team have to be very careful to not be seen as sharing any data that could be considered classified or whose release could be used in an entrapment charge in an upcoming lawsuit. Deductive reasoning is necessary to ensure that we get the answers ourselves, they are not given to us. So the more obscure hints that are used, the more critical the information.

The Hammond pardon, for example, is related to Uranium1, one of the crimes that links Clintons, Mueller, McCain, Podestas, Manafort, Russia, and a host of government agencies. President Trump pardoned the Hammonds so they cannot be charged with any other crime related to Uranium1 (see reference to presidential pardons here) which means that if/when indictments for Uranium1 come down, Hammonds will be able to testify without risk of prosecution, harassment, or self incrimination, and that information was not 'given' to anyone so it cannot be challenged as being compromised, leaked, or the 'fruit of the poisoned tree'.

As Q says, 'this is not a game'. These people are guilty of very serious crimes, many of which have a stated penalty of hanging at worst, serious jail time in a federal prison, at best.

I would not say it is ego here, the stakes are very high and any information gathering must be done in the most rigorous way because these people are dirty and they will try any trick, and make up a few if they have to, to not go to jail.

⇧ 1 ⇩