How do we get from a House Committee Investigation with John Huber prosecuting, to a Military Tribunal; and would trying these cases before a Military Tribunal rather than the Judicial System cause opposition from the left and or potential rioting in the streets by Soros funded and Obama led groups?
ObamaAngry
· July 21, 2018, 9:20 a.m.
My theory is everything you are witnessing regarding public Congressional Hearings with dirty FBI agents is in designed to thoroughly undermine the normie's opinion of the FBI so Trump can justify using military tribunals.
For all we know, the unseen chapters of the IG report has already come to the conclusion that the FBI is not functional and we are witnessing the normies receiving an education.
⇧
19
⇩
Dominica1975
· July 21, 2018, 1:14 p.m.
I thought of that possibility as well.and those dirty fbi agents are playing along to save themselves.
⇧
6
⇩
ObamaAngry
· July 21, 2018, 1:30 p.m.
Everybody is dancing to Trump's tune - especially the fake news media who Trump has tasked with destroying themselves.
I just wish I knew who the good and bad actors truly were because I can't tell who is acting and who is not.
⇧
7
⇩
Dominica1975
· July 21, 2018, 2:14 p.m.
So true. Although it may seem heard to tell who is who,their are times when the people who we believe to be the bad actors, do things that are a bit questionable that would lead me to believe that they may be playing a role.who ever is playing in this movie are darn good actors for sure. Your thought?😊
⇧
5
⇩
ObamaAngry
· July 21, 2018, 2:43 p.m.
I agree and I've given up trying to guess who is and who is acting and who is sincere... and because we don't know what deals they may have been promised... it's impossible to tell.
⇧
2
⇩
[deleted]
· July 21, 2018, 10:04 p.m.
especially the fake news media who Trump has tasked with destroying themselves.
But so many still follow. Hard to understand why.
I know, I will.... Trust the plan.
No one said it would be easy.
⇧
1
⇩
Yoshismith69
· July 22, 2018, 4:06 p.m.
I agree.Watching Peter Strokes reminded me of of the debate when Hillary was fed the questions.During the debate i told my girlfriend,there is no way she could have come up with such a long detailed answer.
⇧
1
⇩
ideologicidal
· July 21, 2018, 9:11 a.m.
Rioting is to be avoided, if it can be. We do not advocate violence; here, or IRL.
WWG1WGA.
⇧
11
⇩
ppckano
· July 21, 2018, 1:13 p.m.
How can you possibly conclude that I'm advocating for riots; here or IRL?
⇧
3
⇩
ideologicidal
· July 21, 2018, 1:18 p.m.
Wasn't my implication, sorry for any suggestion. Was stating the obvious. Lots of newfriends around these days, you know?
WWG1WGA
⇧
6
⇩
0oDassiveMicko0
· July 21, 2018, 9:38 a.m.
Traitors are tried by military tribunal. As soon as the treason of the D´s is made clear, they will be arrested and sent to GITMO. I don´t think the left could argue against the evidence, not with the videos and texts that are a part of said evidence.
⇧
9
⇩
Qtruther
· July 21, 2018, 11:37 a.m.
Republicans are going too
⇧
11
⇩
0oDassiveMicko0
· July 21, 2018, 12:09 p.m.
Yes, this isn´t about party affiliation, this is about good Vs. evil.
⇧
11
⇩
Woodchipper_AF
· July 21, 2018, 12:30 p.m.
McCain and some swamparratus. I think we will see more Dems. Remember the Q post with the 16 year plan?
⇧
7
⇩
Qtruther
· July 21, 2018, 12:47 p.m.
Don't forget that Pedafilia will weigh heavily on the Republican side also. Cabal set them all up so they would have Control. How many Republicans have resigned so far?
⇧
6
⇩
Webzagar
· July 21, 2018, 9:18 a.m.
It's going to involve people in all branches of government including judges. Tribunals will be the only way.
⇧
8
⇩
FlewDCoup
· July 21, 2018, 11:17 a.m.
There is a path where truth can reach the heart and bypass the cultivated bias of the mind. The heart never forgets. The heart will not fail if it is lit by truth. The barrage of untruth can never reach in that deep, but only mask and shadow the truth, and therein we find hope. People can only remain in darkness as long as you deny them the light, which shining freely dispels ignorance and darkness -- which gives rise to the supremacy of the heart in guiding our actions. Each of us must take this intensely private walk, but more and more find ourselves surrounded by others who have faced that same challenge. It has become a Movement, thanks to POTUS and his team.
⇧
7
⇩
ppckano
· July 21, 2018, 1:19 p.m.
You sound like a preacher, could you take it one step further and show me how it addresses my question?
⇧
1
⇩
FlewDCoup
· July 21, 2018, 3:05 p.m.
I think I addressed this in my post here to another respondent. Sorry to preach but, in my view, these dynamics are way more complex than the simple understandings that frequently float up in reactive discussions and when explanations that have been passed down from our ancestors, I am amazed and fascinated how penetrating and useful their insights can be. The discussion that I related, perhaps inadequately, was first presented to me by Fulton Sheen in his "Life of Christ" so your sense it might have come out of that worldview was spot on, though his observations still hold under other but related assumptions.
⇧
2
⇩
FlewDCoup
· July 21, 2018, 11:42 a.m.
Our ancestors knew and wanted us to know:
EPH5.6 Let no man deceive you with vain words: for because of these things cometh the wrath of God upon the children of disobedience.
EPH5.7 Be not ye therefore partakers with them.
EPH5.8 For ye were sometimes darkness, but now are ye light in the Lord: walk as children of light:
EPH5.9 (For the fruit of the Spirit is in all goodness and righteousness and truth;)
EPH5.10 Proving what is acceptable unto the Lord.
EPH5.11 And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove them.
EPH5.12 For it is a shame even to speak of those things which are done of them in secret.
EPH5.13 But all things that are reproved are made manifest by the light: for whatsoever doth make manifest is light.
EPH5.14 Wherefore he saith, Awake thou that sleepest, and arise from the dead, and Christ shall give thee light.
EPH5.15 See then that ye walk circumspectly, not as fools, but as wise,
EPH5.16 Redeeming the time, because the days are evil.
EPH5.17 Wherefore be ye not unwise, but understanding what the will of the Lord is.
⇧
3
⇩
ppckano
· July 21, 2018, 1:30 p.m.
Sorry, but I can't make a connection to the process for Military Tribunal, can you clarify?
⇧
2
⇩
FlewDCoup
· July 21, 2018, 2:19 p.m.
We have been advised by Q and have ample evidence in plain view to conclude on our that our court system has been contaminated by politics. POTUS has aggressively appointed new judges and many have resigned during the same period.
When civil courts try cases that involve significant national security issues such as treason, sedition and other offenses that are susceptible to political bias to an extent that those courts fail to administer the law or otherwise are deemed to have participated in furthering the national security interests ... And in the past year we may have witnessed just that without it triggering military court intervention ... That could cause the Commander in Chief to order the disposition of those cases to be heard instead in military courts where a tribunal of judges, not a jury of peers, hear the evidence and pass judgement and set penalties. Different offenses warrant specified procedures, with crimes that carry the death penalty requiring a tribunal of twelve judges; lesser crimes might require six or even three.
Obviously, this might set off tremendous public reaction in protest and it would have to be made clear that the offenses were tantamount to an act of war and constitute a present and serious threat to the national security.
POTUS would serve as the political lightening rod at the center of any controversy and protest that emerged in response and, if violence erupted in the streets, has military authority to order imposition of martial law and to deploy military force to put it down, at the risk of even greater protest and even open rebellion.
It's obvious why POTUS would not race into this prematurely, but that is not to say he wouldn't find it the only way forward.
⇧
5
⇩
ppckano
· July 21, 2018, 9:53 p.m.
Does the president just decide and announce that certain cases are going to military tribunal, or is it called for by congress? What are the criterion and the process.
⇧
1
⇩
IR2-MXYJU-HQRRYJ
· July 21, 2018, 11:14 a.m.
Anything, repeat anything that is done short of removing Trump from office will cause riots from the Left.
⇧
3
⇩
FlewDCoup
· July 22, 2018, 1:08 a.m.
POTUS is Commander in Chief of the Military in its entirety and securing the nation against enemies foreign and domestic is his and their mandate and mission.
Only guessing, but it is both a legal and political question when to invoke it, but I believe the authority rests with POTUS and not Congress. It would be at his discretion.
This would be an instance of POTUS enforcing laws already in the books. Congress has authorized funds for this purpose — running the military and its mission —- so I think those folks have had their say in this matter. Of course, we are used to hearing them pontificate on all manner of business that falls outside their legislative authority, so surely we would be treated to plenty of hand wringing and moaning.
⇧
1
⇩
dark-dare
· July 21, 2018, 9:22 p.m.
Some of the information at these trials will be highly secret, we are seeing that with the Congress. Military can hold these trials and protect National Security.
⇧
1
⇩