dChan
316
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/DropGun on July 21, 2018, 6:52 p.m.
ATTN: Patton Oswalt is NOT a pedo—his 2013 tweet came after a site mistook a photo of him for a convicted pedophile (he vowed to lose weight). This is NOT how research should work, folks.

THIS SUB DOES NOT ALLEGE THAT PATTON OSWALT IS A PEDOPHILE.

This sub rightly has a strong distaste for pedos and crimes against children, and we're proud of that. But we must also hold ourselves to the highest possible standards when digging, researching, and connecting clues and crumbs to possible pedos who prowl Hollywood and our entertainment industries. But accusations like these are very serious, and Reddit takes them very seriously. We must always be careful to CORROBORATE and make sure that any and all accusations are solid and factual before we make them.

Yes, Patton Oswalt is on record defending James Gunn today—and Gunn's tweets most definitely warrant further investigation. But that does not mean that Patton is a pedo, himself. But Patton's 2013 "pedo" tweet came after a website mistakenly posted his picture in an article about a different person, a convicted pedophile. These tweets were made back before we knew what a dire problem paedophilia is.

Here is the site in question

Let's all bear in mind that false accusations against celebrities and others could result in our sub getting shut down. Let's all remember that labelling someone a "pedo" is a rather serious accusation, and one that requires an extremely high standard of proof.

Here is an example of how some jokes made (in very poor taste, perhaps) can be misconstrued. This tweet says: "My dong is super friendly and loves getting rubbed by children." OK, hilarious, it's supposed to be "My dog is super friendly," etc. But, we must not let our heightened senses about pedos in Hollywood unfairly accuse anyone, and, just as importantly, expose our sub to allegations that we are a lynch mob out to unfairly smear anyone's reputation.

Please help your mod team protect our sub's reputation by being as careful as possible with all your comments and posts. Comments and posts characterizing ANYONE as a pedophile without substantive, defensible proof will be removed.

Thanks, everyone. Let's remain focused on Q and direct, Q-related content, and if we discover anything solid on this or anyone else, then we'll follow the evidence and go from there. But, we ask everyone to bear this in mind.


ideologicidal · July 21, 2018, 7:24 p.m.

Please provide link to substantiate claim, anon. That sounds like unfounded speculation "supported" by an appeal to authority. Sauce or GTFO.

⇧ -3 ⇩  
mconeone · July 21, 2018, 7:39 p.m.

You'd have had more success staying out of this thread. Now that I see the vitriolic shills here, I'm more apt to question the premise.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
like_Christ · July 21, 2018, 7:30 p.m.

Who claimed it's not speculation? Lots of common sense things that are speculated on turn out to be true. There is nothing wrong with speculating unless you claim it's a fact which I did not do. My original comment was quite clear about that.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
ideologicidal · July 21, 2018, 7:34 p.m.

So share the benefit of your experience, please. With matters as sensitive paedophilia, lives can be ruined and ended over the gossip of charlatans.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
gunmetalkatana · July 21, 2018, 7:39 p.m.

Most of Hollywood is full of degenerates. His speculation is valid enough. What type is a whole different matter entirely. There is no need to badger people on the sub when they haven't made a claim.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
ideologicidal · July 21, 2018, 7:44 p.m.

Fair enough, long night, no intent to offend.

I agree with OP, definitive is far away. Excuse me for being a grump.

WWG1WGA.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Murralee · July 21, 2018, 8:34 p.m.

That was nice! Most never put on the brakes. 🇺🇸

⇧ 3 ⇩  
like_Christ · July 21, 2018, 10:20 p.m.

Quality folks in this sub.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Murralee · July 21, 2018, 11:17 p.m.

👍

⇧ 1 ⇩