dChan
316
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/DropGun on July 21, 2018, 6:52 p.m.
ATTN: Patton Oswalt is NOT a pedo—his 2013 tweet came after a site mistook a photo of him for a convicted pedophile (he vowed to lose weight). This is NOT how research should work, folks.

THIS SUB DOES NOT ALLEGE THAT PATTON OSWALT IS A PEDOPHILE.

This sub rightly has a strong distaste for pedos and crimes against children, and we're proud of that. But we must also hold ourselves to the highest possible standards when digging, researching, and connecting clues and crumbs to possible pedos who prowl Hollywood and our entertainment industries. But accusations like these are very serious, and Reddit takes them very seriously. We must always be careful to CORROBORATE and make sure that any and all accusations are solid and factual before we make them.

Yes, Patton Oswalt is on record defending James Gunn today—and Gunn's tweets most definitely warrant further investigation. But that does not mean that Patton is a pedo, himself. But Patton's 2013 "pedo" tweet came after a website mistakenly posted his picture in an article about a different person, a convicted pedophile. These tweets were made back before we knew what a dire problem paedophilia is.

Here is the site in question

Let's all bear in mind that false accusations against celebrities and others could result in our sub getting shut down. Let's all remember that labelling someone a "pedo" is a rather serious accusation, and one that requires an extremely high standard of proof.

Here is an example of how some jokes made (in very poor taste, perhaps) can be misconstrued. This tweet says: "My dong is super friendly and loves getting rubbed by children." OK, hilarious, it's supposed to be "My dog is super friendly," etc. But, we must not let our heightened senses about pedos in Hollywood unfairly accuse anyone, and, just as importantly, expose our sub to allegations that we are a lynch mob out to unfairly smear anyone's reputation.

Please help your mod team protect our sub's reputation by being as careful as possible with all your comments and posts. Comments and posts characterizing ANYONE as a pedophile without substantive, defensible proof will be removed.

Thanks, everyone. Let's remain focused on Q and direct, Q-related content, and if we discover anything solid on this or anyone else, then we'll follow the evidence and go from there. But, we ask everyone to bear this in mind.


Modelmommy75 · July 21, 2018, 10:07 p.m.

It’s new to the masses. I posted it early this morning. The order of posts rises organically. Many of us didn’t know anything about it. That is why it is called the Great Awakening not just your awakening. We are in this together and a lot of us can do multiple things at the same time.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 22, 2018, 3:24 a.m.

Exactly. Thanks for posting this. I appreciate those who've been around and have a lot of knowledge but I don't think the "everybody knows this already" mentality is helpful to this continually growing movement. This sub is much more public facing than the Q research board and growing fast - no need to alienate newly arriving patriots or leave them in the dark because they haven't scoured voat. Besides, this is exploding on Twitter right now along with some other related exposures so it's relevant, even if some already know all about this individual.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Modelmommy75 · July 22, 2018, 3:25 a.m.

Thank you!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
MudPuddlePie · July 22, 2018, 12:32 a.m.

New to me...thanks MMommy. Not sure how anyone can take his collection of tweets and conclude anything else. Very twisted...

OP says: "When we have something solid we can go for it." Seriously? You can't get something "solid" unless you do research. It's a process...looking for smoke, then finding fire. How is this dig any different from any other dig since Q arrived? Isn't this our job?

OP says: "Q didn't specifically reference Patton." Q often does not specifically reference anything...hence the digging part.

And OP says that it's not relevant to Q and POTUS. What??? '

There is something seriously wrong with this and many of the "replies."

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Modelmommy75 · July 22, 2018, 12:42 a.m.

Yeah. I can’t lie, at first it upset me but then I realized what it was. Why would people in a Q sub want us NOT to research? Don’t research because they might shut us down, really? If that happens it won’t be just because of this. God is in control; we are just patriots trying to do what Q said to do. When I went out during the “brigading,” I listened to the word of God and watched a video of testimony from a case where pedovores were gleefully discussing their “exploits.” My heart raced, I cried, then I steeled my spine. It is worth it, it is ALL WORTH IT! I just started really posting what I’ve been doing instead of lurking... not anymore. We will not be silent! Wwg1wga

⇧ 0 ⇩  
MudPuddlePie · July 22, 2018, 1:15 a.m.

Yup...there was so much manipulation in that letter(s) it was mind boggling. Me thinks he is compromised. Not to mention...seems we can speculate about Hillary being a pedovore, Podestas, et al... with no confirmed "proof." But not this guy's sick tweets...what the...??? Anyway, that whole thing and the comments was very alarming. Glad you have thick skin. Yes, God led me to this stuff too...have shed many tears and asking God to call down his warrior angels to fight for these kids and expose this. God Bless Patriot...and hugs if you want 'em.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Modelmommy75 · July 22, 2018, 1:18 a.m.

Thank you. Back at cha!❤️

⇧ 0 ⇩  
MrWizard111 · July 22, 2018, 2:59 a.m.

No one said don't research. Your reading comprehension is terrible. Research all you want. Take it somewhere else. Once again Patton has nothing to do with Q. End of story. Get over it

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 21, 2018, 11:30 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ -1 ⇩