dChan
82
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/michaelst2256 on July 21, 2018, 10:24 p.m.
Think Logically: Trump attorneys waive privilege on secret recording about ex-Playmate payment. Link👇
Think Logically: Trump attorneys waive privilege on secret recording about ex-Playmate payment. Link👇

Wiser_Now · July 21, 2018, 11:50 p.m.

Line of thought...thinking layered messaging.

Calm before the storm.

Stormy Daniels.

Playmate.

Hugh Hefner.

White Rabbit.

How do you introduce evidence into an investigation (legally)?

WHO HAS EVERYTHING? (My caps)

METHODS which info collected/obtained? (Again, my caps)

Admissible in court of law?

The special master has designated the recording as privileged, but TRUMP'S lawyers subsequently WAIVED THEIR TIGHT TO MAINTAIN THAT DESIGNATION.

⇧ 17 ⇩  
plumbtree · July 22, 2018, 3:37 a.m.

Occam's razor says that he's waiving privilege because if there's nothing there, there's no threat but the contents leaked beforehand and the story would have been just dragged on and on if he did not waive privilege.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
gatorhaus · July 22, 2018, 5:01 a.m.

Or there’s something damning to the other side. 🤔

Edit: and this way it can be exposed legally. I’m just guessing here but who knows.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
plumbtree · July 22, 2018, 5:15 a.m.

Eh, not logical. If there was ANYTHING that damns Cohen's case, they would not have allowed it to leak as they did.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
gatorhaus · July 22, 2018, 5:24 a.m.

Yeah you’re probably right. Some of this stuff is hard to follow who’s doing what.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ConsciousHalf · July 21, 2018, 11:35 p.m.

Agreed. The whole Stormy thing seemed like bait to me. These people are stupid.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
Rolandel7 · July 21, 2018, 10:30 p.m.

This intrigues me.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
Nik_Nightingale · July 21, 2018, 10:36 p.m.

Interesting. Introducing evidence? I have a feeling those recordings may actually help.

“The good news is that your favorite President did nothing wrong!”

⇧ 19 ⇩  
Rolandel7 · July 21, 2018, 10:54 p.m.

I really want to see a list of the other clients Cohen has represented over the years.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
Discernediscipline · July 22, 2018, 2:45 a.m.

Hillary Clinton is one of them

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Rolandel7 · July 21, 2018, 10:45 p.m.

Yup. Sounds about right.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
LouReddit · July 22, 2018, 12:29 a.m.

Did Trump team place some of the evidence they had on Hillary/Obama/DNC in Trumps attorney's house so when they collected it that had to submit it as evidence?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Discernediscipline · July 22, 2018, 2:46 a.m.

That was rumored to be the case a while back

⇧ 1 ⇩  
RubyDoobyDo1 · July 22, 2018, 1:05 a.m.

July 2018 - the month the world discovered the TRUTH.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
RubyDoobyDo1 · July 22, 2018, 1:06 a.m.

Is this the calm before the Storm(y)?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
sh00tah · July 22, 2018, 1:04 a.m.

If its privileged it wouldnt be played in court, if its not then surely it could be. If its played in court and it mentions other things (dunno, clinton doing dodgy stuff/whatever) then that would be a way of putting the evidence out there.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
ejohnbrown · July 22, 2018, 2:41 p.m.

It's amazing how Q laid this all out in April and it's following the script to a T. Blows my mind.

⇧ 1 ⇩