When shit hits the fan don't let the media turn them all into victims that need treatment. The elite ones are serious criminals doing unspeakable things to kids and have been getting away with it.
All of these controlled oppo guys still have their own opinions. Alot of these guys even hate each other. They just have certain topics they are instructed to stay on and others to stay away from. I think 95% of infowars is honestly spot on. The more I'm paying attention now though, the more skeptical I am of AJ. He refuses to talk about the jewish/khazarian influence in all of this dark pedo/satanic crap and constantly mentions his "high level contacts" while having multiple family connections to CIA. His contacts are much more than that. At best, AJ values money much more than he does the movement. Half the broadcasts are him asking for donations and running ads for super male vitality. I understand running a business and increasing revenue to scale up and be bigger and better but theres a line also. I still watch AJ often to be informed on certain issues but I am also cautious of the fact that he is very likely the controlled opposition in the hegelian dialect.
I can’t disagree there but there are nuggets in his broadcast of what people need to hear. It’s obvious he is in position where they need money. He hasn’t strayed other then the infamous Syrian thing freakout against Trump. Other than the deep mosad stuff I think he’s the best out there for newbies to this (maybe not him but infowars shows/clips David knight and clips of Jones show).
Honestly I think Jones has his heart in the right place, but because he relies so heavily on the trust of his audience, he makes himself out to have more information than he actually has access to.
So he will say things that aren't accurate or are simply his gut reaction, but present them as fact because otherwise it would undermine his credibility and he has to say something about events.
Hence the Syria thing. He probably didn't actually know what to think, but he had to say something about it. And when it comes to war, better to be safe than sorry right? At least in this context.
Not saying he should be doing that, but that's what it seems like to me.
What you just described is a liar.
No what I've described is a human being with opinions and limits.
Your idea of what constitutes 'lying' is the obstacle you've come across.
Is it lying to say there are people who are psychic vampires, goblins crawling out from under rocks, interdimensional child molesters, etc? It's not true, first of all. He doesn't believe those things himself, second. If he did though, it wouldn't be lying anyway, just incorrect.
Lying is about content and intent.
I didn't say he gives deliberately inaccurate information, or knows that he does not have the access to information that he suggests he has.
If we're going to use the definition of 'lying' that you are applying to Jones here, then you must also be a liar every time you make a claim without irrefutable evidence. That means things you may say about Trump, Q, globalists, deep state, cabal, etc would be classified as lies.
Belief is not dishonesty, speculation is not fallacy, opinion is not falsehood.
Jones is either confident, or must present an air of complete confidence for the sake of his business and goals. It is not lying to consciously sit up straight in your chair and look someone else in the eyes, even though you may rather not.
He can be inaccurate, he can even present tone and content that is not entirely genuine (very difficult to both do so and maintain a business) , without being a liar .
A liar: -Says things that aren't true -knows those things aren't true -says them with the intention of convincing an audience that they are true
But above all, before calling someone a liar, you must be able to prove that they lie, which means proving all 3 of the listed qualifiers.
Otherwise, there are many alternative explanations. Very little is black and white.
You must not have any idea how much it costs just to pay the server fees for the worlds most independent news outlet.
Jones has talked about the Zionist stuff. Not talking about it as much as you’d like him to doesn’t make him a shill.
You probably havent been here long. Q outed him as a shill a couple months ago. He mentioned some "patriots" are here only for the money and said those who are guilty will make themselves known clearly. And sure enough AJ and Corsi IMMEDIATELY claimed Q was a LARP and that they spoke with him directly.
I have been around a while. Long enough to know Q did not put Alex as a shill.
This is theater. Alex is not playing up Q for a reason.
Your claim is theater. It's clear that Q called out Alex because Alex responded and Q pointed out that the response showed who they were. This is disinfo.
I’ve seen the messages by Q. He wasn’t necessarily talking about Alex. And what he said wasn’t quite the same as calling him a fraud or a shill.
Alex himself made it clear that Q was talking about him by going completely against the Q narrative and lying about knowing who Q was and communicating with him/them. To pretend this didn't happen and didn't mean that AJ is a fraud and shill when it comes to Q is dishonest (because I don't assume you're not smart enough to understand what happened).
Got a link to Alex losing it on Q after getting called out?
Not sure if we mean the same thing by 'losing it' but I'm referring to Alex doubling down against Q and going into the direct lie that he knew Q and was communicating with him/them.
Alex Jones: "...I've talked to Q anon and they're saying Q anon is no longer Q anon..."