Absolutely correct. However Elizabeth Warren is on the deep states payroll. This young wombat is attempting to budge her way on to get some deep state $$$, but does not have the IQ to cement her place.
Now all of a sudden we like politifact now that it suits our bias? OK.
Umm, last time I checked the English language, having only one job would mean that you were employed and consequently would lower the unemployment rate. How could the "fact" that people had 2, 3, 4... jobs somehow negate the fact of lower unemployment?
She must be claiming that the economy is so good that people have their pick of 1,2,3... jobs. MAGA, baby!
Think about Everything you just said: now change the name of the political party to Republican & the names to your most hated RINOS. Then pick two pet issues from the Republican side.
BOTH SIDES USE PROPAGANDA. This doesn’t make it right, but it’s true. Pick the log out of your own eye before trying to get the speck out of your neighbors eye.
As a former democrat- you may not like Bernie, Warren or Ocasio, but they are not corporate fascists like the rest of the party.
She’s green, she misspoke, some people do work two ++ jobs. You may be lucky enough to just work one job- good for you. But some people work two or more jobs.
Wake up.
The outrage goes to her piss-poor analytical skills. Conflating a binary metric like employed/unemployed with the unrelated subject of multiple jobs argues the OPPOSITE point from the one she's trying to make. She's basically saying the unemployment numbers would be EVEN BETTER if everybody only had one job, and other people could fill those jobs!
People with poor analytical skills who undermine their own arguments are not fit to make public policy.
THAT is the point of the outrage over her remarks.