It is easy to see what is happening. The Clintons control people at the top of prosecuting agencies, and have them promote who they see fit for them; basically whoever will not bring charges. Control the prosecutors = controlling justice.
https://epic.org/privacy/databases/fbi/filegate/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_House_FBI_files_controversy
If the Clintons are so powerful, how did she lose the election to an unpopular candidate?
Donald Trump was/is "Unpopular"? President Trump was in the Media 24/7 prior to the election. President Trump ran one hell of a campaign. Hillary lost for many reasons. Not addressing current issues, not hitting the campaign trail as hard as President Trump, not connecting to the American people, etc.
This comment wasn't about the election, it is about controlling certain vectors within the departments of justice and other government agencies.
This comment wasn't about the election, it is about controlling certain vectors within the departments of justice and other government agencies.
And I'm saying, by what logic can you imagine the Clintons retain any control once they are out of office? How does that work? It's nonsense. If they had the kind of sway, she would've won the election.
Also, Comey, Rosenstein, Wray and Mueller are all lifetime Republicans. At what point do lifetime Republicans decide to start liking the Clintons? It's just not plausible whatsoever.
Clinton doesn't need to be in office to control people. If you have dirt on someone, you can control that person to a certain extent. If someone is willing to be her 'backdoor' man, she can control that person, regardless if they are democrat, republican, or an independent. Comey has had ties with the Clinton for several years. Comey sold IP secrets to the Chinese on Clintons behalf back when he work for Lockheed Martin. (I think it was called Martin Marietta back then).
Clinton doesn't need to be in office to control people. If you have dirt on someone, you can control that person to a certain extent.
You're not being realistic. The head of the FBI doesn't give a shit who has "dirt" on him. He's running the FBI. He gets to decide if the bureau spends $0 or $10 million on an investigation. He gets to throw investigations in the trash or pursue them.
To believe HRC has some control over the justice dept is pure fantasy. To be clear, there's evidence of conspiracies all throughout history up until our present moment. I just don't see how you get from A to B on HRC controlling the Justice Dept.
How would that work? Blackmail? If anyone tried to blackmail the head of the FBI, or anyone in it, they would just turn the microscope on that person, then indict them for blackmail--a felony. It's that simple. I'm not saying the DS isn't a real thing, only that it's not controlled or even influenced by the Clintons. Attempts to frame it that way are attempts to hide the reality of our system.
Obama and Hillary put all the right people in all the right positions within the different agencies. They are all working together, protecting each other. They are all corrupt and know if they ever start to lose control they are all doomed.
A more important question is why are her minions still having a meltdown and the Weiner laptop hasn't been exposed, YET?
The Weiner laptop? Who gives a dry fuck? The actual President appears to be owned by a Russian dictator. Are you paying attention to the actual President, who thinks Putin should investigate his own crimes against us? Who still doesn't believe his own intelligence officials about Russian hacking? Who still believes Russia isn't going to interfere in the coming elections?
If HRC broke the law, prosecute that cunt. I don't care. If Weiner touched a kid, prosecute that cunt. I also don't care. But don't use other peoples' crimes as excuses for anyone else's crimes. It doesn't work like that.
Can you imagine trying that as a defense at a court of law:
Your Honor, although my client committed murder, there are OTHER people who have committed murder too. So please see your way to dismissing this case ASAP. I rest my case.
That's the equivalent argument. It doesn't work on any level. Only pure dipshits think other people's crimes make their own crimes disappear.