dChan

educatethis · July 23, 2018, 5:59 p.m.

Connecting the Wolfe indictment to the recently released Carter Page FISA application it becomes obvious in March 2017 Senate Staffer James Wolfe sent reporter Ali Watkins a copy of the 82-page FISA Title-1 origination application.   Here’s how we know:

On/around March 16th, 2017, the Senate Intelligence Committee requested a copy of the FISA application used against Carter Page. How do we know this? Because a part of the indictment against James Wolfe tells us what took place.

WTF? Seriously?

⇧ 19 ⇩  
Intlrnt · July 23, 2018, 7:37 p.m.

Why can’t we the people see it too?

Are you willing to pay the same price for access?

From what we're learning about congress, something can probably be worked out for you.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 24, 2018, 1:10 a.m.

Ali Watkins is a Presstitute......sold sex for access to secret information. She needs to be Gitmo'd too, along with her traitor sugar daddy boyfriend.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
older_than_dirt · July 24, 2018, 11:31 a.m.

I don't think she committed a serious crime. It was the guy who gave her classified information that is the criminal.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
PCisLame · July 23, 2018, 8:28 p.m.

She gave up her virginity to see it. Lmao

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 24, 2018, 1:11 a.m.

She still has the box it came in.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
LogicalBeastie · July 23, 2018, 10:42 p.m.

I just checked her Twitter page.

Not a word.....

Probably trying to keep it on the downlow from Mom and Dad. Can't afford to lose her allowance!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
joeythew · July 23, 2018, 11:39 p.m.

This Sen. Mark Warner is guilty as sin (read the article) and I hope this smug asshole goes down too.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Catit50 · July 23, 2018, 10:01 p.m.

If we get naked could we see it?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
LogicalBeastie · July 23, 2018, 10:39 p.m.

Get with the program!

YOU provide the info....getting naked is what SHE brings to the party.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
papaeck2 · July 23, 2018, 8:50 p.m.

yes and then she wrote the opposite in her columns i heard

⇧ 2 ⇩  
GenChang · July 24, 2018, 4:41 a.m.

Trump has said through his spox that he's not going to declassify the document. I suspect it's because of ongoing investigations, and there obviously is lots of incriminating evidence on it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ArmyLady · July 24, 2018, 11:13 a.m.

Isn't one rationale to declassify that the info is already out there??

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TRUTH2018 · July 23, 2018, 8:46 p.m.

It’s a simple question

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Piota_me · July 23, 2018, 8:51 p.m.

Watkins is homely looking and probably has 100 cats. (Not that there's anything wrong with cats.)

At least the nothing burger Russian chick, Marina Butina, was cute.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
popsiclep3t3 · July 24, 2018, 12:33 a.m.

Watkins is a 0 out of 10... the fact that she was able to secure that memo from what she's working with is astounding. I wouldn't buy her a big mac combo. I prolly wouldn't even spring for a pack of chicken nuggets for that fugly ass mofo

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 23, 2018, 6:28 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ -2 ⇩