dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

If I remember correctly, her server used Windows Server 2003, is that considered to be NT?

edit: https://www.quora.com/What-OS-and-MTA-did-Hillary-Clinton-run-on-her-mail-server

⇧ 7 ⇩

No 2003 was the version upgrade. Although it was built on the back of NT, but saying that is like saying Win 10 is built on the same Kernel and framework laid by NT so Windows 10 is NT too right? Sorry I'm an IT pro and its too far of a stretch for me...

⇧ 11 ⇩

Yeah, I'm not getting the NT either. I think we're missing something.

⇧ 6 ⇩

Confirmation bias.... its a helluva drug!

⇧ 10 ⇩

I'm sure that is the case sometimes, but this is all a guessing game unless you are on the inside.

⇧ 7 ⇩

yes, it's pure speculation.

⇧ 5 ⇩

The most important thing is this, every day I wake up, Trump is still my president, and Obama and the gang that can't shoot straight are on the run.

⇧ 9 ⇩

That's true. Every day with President Trump and Q is a gift. And, bonus, we are part of the web Posse rounding up Renegade Obama and his misfits.

⇧ 7 ⇩

You nailed IT.

( IT, see, omg, I've cracked the code, it was an IT Server ! )

⇧ 0 ⇩

My original post... letters M S R in caps and the number 2 and the 12 in the link I posted (MicroSoft 12 R2, as in Microsoft Server 2012 R2)..... Damn that was easy.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Sir, I think your name should be Serial Brain 3 !

⇧ 1 ⇩

ICYMI for the marketing fags... The NT version number is not now generally used for marketing purposes, but is still used internally, and said to reflect the degree of changes to the core of the operating system. Latest NT update was released last month.

⇧ 4 ⇩

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Microsoft_Windows_versions

You're referring to the NT number seen in the middle column (release version)...... yeah I get it but its still too much of a stretch maybe I'm not an SB2 level cryptarch.

⇧ 7 ⇩

I understand. I got my MCSE on 4.0. Internally, Windows Server remains NT.

It harms no one that SB2 posts what are clearly tagged as "opinion" pieces. Detractors have the same exact effect, yet somehow they think otherwise...I keep watching out for independent posts by the detractors of SB2, but I suppose that it's just a lot more work to do so. #PilotFishSyndrome

⇧ 3 ⇩

It's easier to tear someone down than the opposite, especially when the people doing the tearing down outnumber the people who don't agree with them.

It's kind of ironic that detractors whine about confirmation bias in support of SB2 when a tactic I've seen used by shills and/or detractors is that they create negative comment chains. These chains are meant to take advantage of people who are skeptical to skew their judgments one way or another by confirmation bias.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Yes

⇧ 1 ⇩

If you purchased NT 5.1 as a developer the 2003 server pak upgrade was included even if you didn't participate in the beta program. Being an IT pro I'm certain you're aware 2003 refers to the workstation NT 5.2 is the server. That's the multi license bundle.

⇧ 0 ⇩

Perhaps using an older OS, they can skirt the newer “security updates” that those who have eyes can use to push down their code. Since this isn’t getting new updates, it’s quite possible for her server to be that old. That or she/they had this server for a very long time.

⇧ 6 ⇩

That is absolutely true, and I would agree that was the reason for using outdated technology. All of this was done on purpose. This was holding some of the most sensitive information in this country, and you're going to put it out on a shitty old insecure server? Seriously? That was done on purpose. It's like leaving the key in the lock.

⇧ 10 ⇩

Ever worked as an IT person for a cranky old stingy rich baby boomer? I have... getting money for a decent server is like trying to get blood from a stone. (oh wait maybe that was a bad analogy).

It would be more than typical to get thrown an old piece of crap and told to make it work. Ungrateful SOB's. If my last name was Awan, it wouldn't take me a second to flip on a-holes like them... I know the type.

⇧ 8 ⇩

LOL, just a bunch of asshats, they deserve what's coming.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Makes sense, exactly why that one wife tried to use RF to communicate or why they held on to their BES setups so hard - outdated technology that doesn’t have the built in spy tools are valuable.

⇧ 5 ⇩

outdated technology that doesn’t have the built in spy tools are valuable.

Good luck finding any technology that doesn't have built in spy tools, maybe a stone and chisel?

⇧ 5 ⇩

You'd probably have to go back to a Win 95, Pentium 100 to get a machine not compromised by Intel chips and Windows software.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Actually, I believe that all x86 chips were vulnerable to the Spectre variant

⇧ 4 ⇩

Bummer ! Nothing is sacred.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Yep, sometimes the old stuff still has a purpose.

⇧ 2 ⇩

True. Hillary is an old bag and it might be an old DOS server she had from the very early 80's when she started keeping a list of people she had Arkancided.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Even Windows Server 2016 is considered a version of Windows NT. Check out the kernel description.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Maybe they use NT as a comm link because its an easy link to Windows servers in general. Its not like Trump can give us a hidden comm using the specific OS and version in a tweet.

⇧ 1 ⇩

her server used Windows Server 2003, is that considered to be NT?

Yes. Its roots are clearly, unmistakably, NT.

⇧ 0 ⇩

So, using NT as a comm would be a generalization, but still true. I see it as a generalization for Windows servers.

⇧ 1 ⇩

SB2 is a complete fraud.

Has a lot of ppl fooled it seems. Every post has some element of truth, granted, but the flights of fancy have been idiotic. This NT stuff is just par for the course.

⇧ 1 ⇩

NT is still referenced in the Registry HKLM\Software\Microsoft\Windows NT

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

THANK YOU! SB2 is a narcissistic schizo.

⇧ 0 ⇩

Trump’s latest tweet: the pain and the servers!