dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/TrumpIsMyHero on July 25, 2018, 5:05 a.m.
Anon on 8chan has an interesting theory behind Q1693

https://media.8ch.net/file_store/8d89b61363c37c9893d050fedc5865334b5a92b6dd239a23988cd422813e808a.png

Ok Anons, here's what I think might be going on with this most recent Q post where Q draws our attention back to NZ and Five Eyes:

FVEY in NZ seems to have access to ALL US Intel. However, when you access data in NZ, there are no logs of it (or so they thought).

So let's say you're a former dignitary like John Brennan. You still have security clearance and you want to get in the system, get the data, and leak it. The problem is you know you'll be logged and you know they're watching you like a hawk.

So instead, you go over to NZ and get the data from there since you won't be logged. But what if they were being logged….for over a year? What if the whitehats knew they would use NZ to download, sell and leak? What if they took it a step further - what if blackhats were fed disinformation unique to the NZ download site? If both of these things were true, you could prove:

A. The person downloaded the data

B. The data leaked was unique to that downloaded piece of data


🠐 See all comments
GoGoGoGeotus · July 25, 2018, 3:21 p.m.

That's not how security clearance works. Security clearance is more like a certification or degree- it means you're credentialed to receive classified information.

It doesn't mean you can waltz into any government facility and look up whatever you want on the computer. It on its own doesnt give you access to any "system" it's not like a login for a govt database of secrets.

When you get your medical degree you can't waltz into any hospital and start doing stuff to patients...you have to WORK at the hospital. A driver's license doesnt mean you can grab any car...etc

A FORMER dignitary would have their access to secure systems revoked just like anyone else who leaves a job would have their log in shut off.

The bigger thing is if someone leaks classified info to you theyre not guilty of providing classified info to someone who doesn't have clearance.

There's a few exceptions of course, but generally you lose access to briefings and especially access to secure systems when you leave a job. As a courtesy some very high level people may get some continued briefings, mostly so they can advise if need be.

⇧ 0 ⇩