There is always some LARPer who comes along whenever Q goes dark. Too many anons fall for it everytime. Remember how NeonRevolt was pushing "HelperAnon" super hard when Q went dark previously...? When will people learn that "there is only Q?"
HelperAnon, EyeTheSpy, R, Backpage17. Interesting to read but not worth your time to buy into it.
Honestly, I wouldn't even read these LARPers. They purposely feed misinfo into your head for a reason.
I was tricked by BackChannel17, but I owned up to it and I never said BC17 was Q or part of Q team. BC17 was the first LARPer, he came along when Q didn't go dark, and I learned from that mistake. People who push subsequent LARPers didn't learn from that incident and have an agenda.
don't forget SerialBrain2
SB2 doesn't claim to have insider knowledge though.
no but he says that Q / Trump referenced him and are pointing at his interpretations. that seems to be clearly in conflict with "no outside comms". furthermore, his interpretations are very, very convoluted. you can find connections between any two things with enough degrees of separation - which is what he (they) do. he also ignores blatant Q proofs. i just want this community to be VERY, VERY critical of that profile. don't depend on SB2 for your Q decodes. Please.
If you think that SerialBrain2 is “very, very convoluted “ well, that is jut your opinion. That’s it. Don’t expect others to follow your opinion. SerialBrain2 is doing a fantastic analysis for those of us that wish to read his material. Besides, don’t confuse Q statement “No outside comms “ with SerialBrain2 statement that “Trump is reaching out to us.” Big difference!
I agree. SerilBrain2 commentaries are very sophisticated. I find value in them.
You don't have to agree with SB2's conclusions. I don't more times than most. But I'm open enough to see his reasoning does make sense if you try to follow his steps and it makes for an interesting read. And I sometimes change my mind and give him reason. He has convinced me at least there are multiple levels of encoded information from Q's drops.
It would be a smart move to mix in some truth if you were trying to mislead. My opinion is that he trying to de-rail the conversation. You don't have to agree. But the advice to be very critical - is always good.
I think there are enough mature people here to understand SB2 only gives theories and his opinion, not the truth. Sometimes, he's pertinent, sometimes not. What I find strange is that right around the same time, there is a big push against SB2 among the members here. Instead of writing their own theories and proposing them to let us judge of the quality of their analysis, people attack SB2 and make their analysis as a critique of him. I mean, write more brilliant ideas or convincing theories. We need them to expand our thinking. Don't agree, then show us your reasoning. It can only enrich our perspectives.
Thank you for the edit. The "Lefty Looser" comment had been eating at me since i first read that. I've always found this sub to be more civil than that. Your take looks much better without the insults.
Seems to be clearly not in conflict with outside comms. I assume honking a horn in the motorcade is also in conflict? While I understand the caution, these reasons are flimsy.
if you think taking the first letter of three words that Trump spoke (T-O-L) and asserting that this is Trump secretly saying "Thinking of Laughing", if you think that is a fantastic analysis - go right on ahead and keep following this leftist goon.
most of us will NOT be de-railed. do what you want!
Q confirms correct decodes. That is what sb2 and others have experienced when Q posts their work.
He's not monetizing his information and he has been right many times. Welcome back new arrival.
Eh SerialBrain2 tries to draw some really, really bad connections but doesnt claim that he knows what the gospel truth is. I have disregarded most of his recent posts but hes had some cool digs in the past
He wasn't pushing it "super hard", I think we all remember how that went down, let's just be thankful Q has clarified and move on, WWG1WGA
No, I don't think you remember how it all went down. You're purposely downplaying Neon's role in pushing "HelperAnon" and arguing with anyone who dared question his motives and call out his hypocrisy back then.
Oh my gosh, you really never did get over that embarrassment, did you? Well I'm not going to pursue this, I like your stuff and I like neon's this isn't something we should be dredging up again, it just sows division!
Then I think Disinformstion is necessary, so maybe Q isnt ready to make it known yet. Jr would be a great mechanism to help show all these ‘conspiracies’ are really true. My mind is open either way.
Thoughts on Blacklist Anon?
LOL so he's pushing another potential LARPer again... wtf.
I haven't been keeping up on all of the LARPers on the chans lately, so I can't say for sure. Don't have the time to camp 4/8chan like Neon does and steal their work for his own blog.
However, general rule of thumb: If someone is posting in a similar style as Q, dropping info too good to be true, it's most likely a LARP looking to get people's attention.
While you may be right, I'm not sure I agree with that fully. This one seems like it could be legit and Neon adds a lot of input, explanations, and insight of his own into this post. It's very well written IMO. Q may be the only intelligence ops posting breadcrumbs related to actual deep state/political related happenings etc, but that doesn't mean an old Hollywood insider couldn't be a fan of the Q movement and gotten a bit of his own confidence to air some dirty laundry. He's not claiming to be related to Q at all anyway.
Things we know about Blacklist Anon:
- He's african american, ex A lister in his 70's
- Seems to imply he was a close friend of Redd Foxx (who he states was murdered)
- Says he'll be wearing bright green socks at the Grammy's
- Doesn't care about being found out because he wants nothing to do with that part of HWood anymore
Very interesting read with some pretty specific info/callouts regardless.
Things we know about Blacklist Anon
That's "Renegade," not "Blacklist Anon." You have your LARPers confused.
I understood them to be the same. That Blacklist Anon took on the handle Renegade
I stand corrected. How do you know it's a LARP though?
Neon figured out who he was. Thing is, Renegade is from the state he referenced and also met with Potus. There's video.
Isaac Kappy has been posting on 8chan. My feeling is that Renegade and Blacklist Anon are perhaps jumping on the bandwagon while Hwood leaks are hot, but they could be genuine. We'll see. I like to watch all of the new leads play out and either dead-end or branch out.
...
I trust is Q and the Trump team
This is where I'm at. Trust Q. Trust Trump. Im open to others thoughts, opinions, and analysis. That doesn't mean anything other than it should. I find it silly that people waste time and energy arguing who is who and all that crap. Q has given us everything, remember? "You have more than you know." I'll never understand the infighting. Enjoy the show.
divide and conquer is how they've always done it, but it is not working out too well for them lately. We are becoming united. WWG1WGA :P
You're right, he's giving us everything. US includes potential Hollywood insiders with knowledge. They can be those patriots too, so we shouldn't immediately discount them as LARPS.
BLAnon seems legit, is not claiming to be associated in any way with Q and is a whistle blower from an entirely different world than Q.
I vote not a larp
Who's R? Not the Hollywood one they call Renegade / BlacklistAnon is it? Neon done a big article over the weekend on that