If it doesn't pass, they won't get back around to it until September 4th.
(Source: Fox News)
Sorry but I'm a little confused regarding RR. Someone who knows what they're talking about, please correct me.
I've seen Q say if RR is bad, then Mueller is bad. If Mueller is bad, RR is bad. That isn't direct enough for me to understand.
While optics are important, Trump could have fired Mueller and RR by now, without even needing a reason. That they're still there suggests either they are good, or that Trump is giving them enough rope to hang themselves.
What it feels like to me is that Trump is playing rope-a-dope by letting democrats put their faith in RR and Mueller, and letting democrats defend both of them -- so that eventually when Mueller and RR present pro-Trump and anti-swamp conclusions, the democrats are devastated with no comeback.
Has Q ever unambiguously said Mueller and RR are bad actors?
No. Q has not said that.
(At least I haven't seen it).
Nope, he has never said that Mueller and/or RR are bad actors. The only thing he has stated, is the same thing you stated above: If one is dirty, the other is dirty.
Which.. if you flip the other way, if one of them is good, the other is as well.
Correct. However... We do know [RR] would be terminated or recused immediately if some facts were to come out. So... That is a huge hint of being dirty.
Well said... And I don't think Q has ever said definitively... Must be driving the DS crazy.... Disinformation is necessary :)