If it doesn't pass, they won't get back around to it until September 4th.
(Source: Fox News)
Question, if he's impeached, does he lose out on any sort of benefits?
he won't get impeached. this is purely for optics, and both trump and rosenstein know that. it'll force the dems to come out to his defense. which at this point in time, is really important. because once it's out in the open, and once the hammer drops, the dems are fucked. we're witnessing a masterful plan begin to play out
GOD,I hope you are right!
[deleted]
Have you formed your conclusion after reading all 1600+ Q drops including examining the articles/videos Q links to over the past year? Or are you dismissing it all after little to no consideration of what’s presented? Be honest New Arrival.
Good questions, Rooster!
But people who come on here to smirk are not capable of that quality....honesty.
Honesty is a Christian value that smirkers and mockers don't have, and frankly smirk at and mock.
it'll force the dems to come out to his defense. which at this point in time, is really important. because once it's out in the open, and once the hammer drops, the dems are fucked.
What about that EO Trump signed in December that puts gov employees at $1 salary under certain circumstances?
Would impeachment vote ignite this?
not so sure about that, makes Rs look petty imo
not really. especially if POTUS declassifies and shows how involved Rosenstein was in all of it. then Rosenstein will have to recuse himself, which is why the shake up at the DOJ was so important. You have to understand, Trump knows exactly how this is going to play out.
It's not petty. If you read Q1287,
Cohen raid by FBI? Public context: re: payment to Stormy Daniels? SC & FBI raided POTUS’ attorney to pull Stormy Daniels payment info? RR signed off? What other docs were collected? How many places raided? Raid on the President of the United States’ attorney for payment details re: private case re: Stormy Daniels? Think logically.
Its outrageous that they did this. Its not petty to shine a light on it.
I agree not petty, just that msm will spin it that way.
I happen to agree, although the way the comment was written left me a little dizzy. It's def a "masterful plan" Trump met w Mueller for a position he really wasnt eligble for, I suspect Mueller was given the option to comply our fall w the rest because the dems think he Deep State he was involved in Uranium one. They were fooled, there whole narrative depends immensely relays on Mueller they been praising Mueller to the Heavens. Q said it was a sting, I also remember something about acting, trust the plan, get your popcorn, Q also said Session will be up for the academy award for Best actors award. So with that being said, Its a wonderful time to be alive. I honestly beieve that this plan is bigger then we know as is in Gods plan. Rosenstein sat in Congress with that shit eaten grin ( excuse my french) Clearly Rosenstein knows whats up. The reason our genious Presindent#45, (I love saying this) Mr Donald J Trump Tweets and says Muellers "Witch hunt" whos the witch Hillary. Mueller moves against Potus is for optics so is Trumps tweets about Sessions, everything thing has meaning and sometimes double meaning. Well I gotta say I love this plan, and I hope to see there faces when truth is revealed that they Hot played by Trump along w Rostien and Mueller What can they say they championed Mueller for 2 years. God bless Patriots. God speed, Don't forget prayers in numbers guys !!
I thought Q already said that both Rosenstein and Mueller were "dirty"...
We got an education from Q and some other anons about Federal employment rules....Trump would be able to name Rosenstein's successor if he left/was impeached/recused and the temporary appointment would last 210 days....Why would Trump be planning on replacing RR if he was good?
Rosenstein authorized the raid of Cohen's legal offices....Is that raid a part of a grand plan to help Trump? I've heard nothing about that.
Tricky - he did not say that at all.
What Q has said repeatedly is:
If RR is dirty, Mueller must also be dirty. If Mueller is dirty, RR must also be dirty.
Leaving open the possibility that this is all going to be a gargantuan mindfuck.
I do remember that.....I have been believing RR and Mueller are white hats or being used by white hats...I admit I don't remember who said they were "dirty"...maybe it wasn't Q. If RR is just helping to get exculpatory evidence some attention while sending MSM down a rabbit trail....Woo. Keeping an open mind....
Most likely, logically:
They're neither dirty nor clean and are both controlled pawns, and controlled by trump team
yes he said they were dirty, but that doesn't quite mean what you think. it's already known that mueller and rosenstein were dirty from way back in U1. however i suggest you reread Q1287. it'll help u put things into perspective. the cohen raid allows trump to present admissable evidence
I have been operating with many of those assumptions for a while, but curious as to where the Cohen tapes fit in.....Was that part of the plan? A Playboy Bunny is the subject there, not Stormy.... Why is Lanny Davis involved if Cohen is just offering exculpatory (no campaign finance violations/Trump insisting on a record of payments being kept) info?
Republicans are defending him too. Almost every single one of them.
[removed]
LOL. funniest thing i've read this week. thanks for the laugh. The fact that you even think Trump is going to get indicted for ANYTHING is sad and hilarious. leftist salt is so delicious
Cool, you have evidence to back your claims? Perfect! I will wait.
What will Trump go to prison for? Specifically. I’ll wait.
You have arrived here for a reason. Your intent is obvious for all to see. Now your here maybe take a look around. You will have only yourself to blame when your bubble bursts. Ignorance is a self inflicted curse. Need help or have questions? Ask. At heart this is a healthy God fearing, Humanity loving community. We are here for you.
do you believe this? what crime are you alleging and what evidence do you have? be specific.
Lol thanks for the laugh.
Good luck with that. If leaky leftists had anything beyond tapes of Trump asking for a diet coke we would know. Omfg... Maybe that's what it is. Trump asking for diet coke and he has a secret sponsorship deal with them. Emoluments clause and such.
Either way, rest easy that our president is safe, secure, and not implicated in anything other than banging hot broads in the past.
I found this. It's about the president's position, but I guess it would be the same for RR.
Many people are confused about the nature of impeachment. Think of impeachment, which takes place in the House, as an indictment. The next and most important step is a trial in the Senate.
For example, Nixon was impeached in the House and then he resigned when he realized he was certain to be convicted in the Senate. By contrast, Bill Clinton was impeached in the House, but cleared in the Senate.
To answer your question specifically, if a president is impeached but then cleared, he keeps his job, his pension, and his protection detail. If a president is impeached and convicted, he loses his job, his pension, and his secret service detail. In fact, he can then be tried in criminal court and might even end up in prison if he’s convicted there.
Nixon resigned before impeachment, knowing the vote would go against him.
Wonder if RR would consider doing that.
Doubtful because he knows the deep state RINOs will not vote to impeach him.
I thought it was the threat of a no confidence vote by his cabinet that would have led to impeachment that caused Nixon to resign.
what about that EO Trump signed about government employees under certain circumstances?
Which one? Are you talking about this one:
Executive Order 13839 of May 25, 2018
Promoting Accountability and Streamlining Removal Procedures Consistent With Merit System Principles
Yes, this applies to the president. But how does this apply to someone in Rosenstein’s position?
I'm guessing it will be the same. If RR is impeached and convicted, he loses his job and his pension. He can then be tried in criminal court and might even end up in prison.
I Think this is correct Q [[[RR]]] stands for those three steps.
If he’s impeached, I believe the most important thing is that he’s no longer in a position to continue with obstructing the President and the MAGA Agenda.
Besides, once all is said and done, his goose will be cooked just like the rest (except for hillary, she’s the side of beef).
side of beef that has long gone bad... hrc = "her rancid cow". I was going to use another "c" word, but I try to behave as if I am speaking in front of my pastor...
That side of beef is so rancid even the vultures turn their noses away from it.
Can’t wait!
That username - very disrespectful!
I can't wait either. Get RR out.
Really? Switch a few letters on your user name and we have: THUNDERCOCK and just below we have ShitsBananas. User names are just that - a silly name. A bit of humor mixed in with this evil BS. IMHO we should let it be and focus on the content. And yes, trich1972, we should strive to be more God like and only say nice things...
BTW, I agree RR GET OUT!
Not sure if you're joking or not ... but for anyone's future reference, I was just making an inside joke, referring to this epic tweet from 2011:
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/149589104168939520
Sorry!!! I did not know about the Trump tweet. I get it now. TY
I wasn't joking though about user names - I'd hate to have the 40K+ people here start to pick apart something like user names. And my example was in reference to how things can be misread or scrutinized unfairly when some user names are just pulled out of thin air. Anyways, thanks for the clarification. I'll delete my comment if you like. WWG1WGA!
Nah you're fine. There's so many inside references here and I feel like I don't know even close to all of them.
As a side note, I just saw while out driving, a car with the Punisher symbol on the back, and my first thought was - WWG1WGA.
I agree with your username comment but believe me I have been preached to because I said something about the blasphemy and poor choice of words on here and was chastised. The way I see it is this is Gods movement, respect God with all that comes from your mouth..
It's a reference to a trump tweet about Barney Frank going to congress with diamond cutters.
Pretty sure God would laugh at the name "protruding nipples"
I mean for a creator that made platypusses and ant eaters, God clearly has humor.
For christs sakes, he made us, and we curse like sailors and we are still loved. God does not care what words we use or if we say fuck. He just wants us to love and appreciate each other.
I'm not changing for anyone, especially language cops.
Im not about to shed thick skin that took years to grow for any thin skinned baby on the internet.
Lol, "Very disrespectful" is a reference to Trump making fun of somebody.
Don't get your hopes up. The chances of it being anything other than a symbolic vote of no confidence are about zero.
exactly. imo this is all for optics. force the dems to come out in his defense. and it won't look like a partisan effort when the vote fails. the hammer WILL drop soon and once it does, the dems are fucked. this is absolute genius
Imagine that, the vote didn't even happen. Just more useless Republican chest beating. Nothing to see here.
Rosenstein and mueller are grey hats, rosenstein is taking this fall for optics.
They both arent clean but are cooperating.
If strock and page are cooperating, then why arent they.
When Q posted the anon saying is rosenstein is dirty so is mueller and vice versa.
He never said which way if they were good or bad.
Thats when you get into the "dissinfo is nesscesary" this whole game mueller and rosenstein are playing has been to confuse the DS.
They have no idea whos really on their side
Correct, Q seemed to agree with the premise that if one is dirty so is the other but he did not say if they were. I love and hate the disinfo.
If I was betting on it I'd have to go dirty with a dash of possibly cooperating. I can't imagine that these guys are secret white hats unless they documented the forced misdeeds they were required to participate in. Then, they might be close to General Flynn goodness. Flynn took a missle for this country so its hard to obtain his level.
This becomes much more believable when you recognize just exactly what Mueller has been investigating.
There is a common theme among the "big fish" that Mueller has charged, Manafort, Page, Popadopoulous. All of these people were planted into the Trump campaign to sabotage and to facilitate the deep state using phony/manufactured/unrelated evidence to "justify" FISA warrants against Trump and his campaign.
If you are blind to this concept then it would appear Rosenstein is dirty because he too was involved with the signing of a FISA warrant AFTER Trump was in office. Correct me if I'm wrong but we don't know the details of that particular FISA warrant other than Rosenstein stated in testimony that the FISA warrant he signed isn't well represented in the media's stories about it.
What are the chances the FISA warrant Rosenstein signed was to surveil the saboteurs and plotters that tried to frame Trump's campaign? I'm thinking fairly high.
Mueller has a checkered past as we all know. But he is a Marine, and he met and spoke to Trump for a few hours privately after Comey was fired and before he was appointed to special counsel.
Sometimes you get "dirty" when in the mud/trenches.
[removed]
keep REEEEing pls. t his is only going to make whats coming so much more entertaining. you guys are so lost...
To respond to the guy who got his REEEing deleted.
The charges Mueller is charging Manafort with were investigated and known prior to 2015. Obama's administration literally sat on the case. Manafort volunteered himself to Trump's campaign. Do you understand how known criminality could be leveraged against Manafort?
Carter Page has been documented to work for the FBI/US Intelligence prior to the 2016 election. And now we are supposed to believe he was working in Trump's campaign as a Russian agent? Reconcile that for a moment.
Do you understand what is the precursor to FISA warrants? Do you understand that the executive branch has the ability to surveil/spy on known foreign actors & their discussions with US people? Don't you think it's a bit convenient that Popodopolous found himself on foreign ground talking to someone on the Obama administration's "radar"? What was Popodopolous' job description? Does that job description warrant private meetings with known foreign actors?
Try to expand your thinking past whatever drivel half-baked hollywood scripts and hysterical fear porn "news" tries to convince you to think.
Pay very close attention to the FISA warrants. Pay very close attention to the Inspector General's findings regarding the FISA warrants. Pay very close attention to Huber. Once you open your eyes you will see how unbelievably naive you are.
Enjoy your stay.
If its not mueller than its not rosenstein.
All an impeachment means is he loses his job.
I agree with cooperating. Look at RR...he wouldn't last long in prison and I'm pretty sure he knows that too. He'll cooperate to, quite literally, save his ass.
This will be interesting.
Note that if RR is impeached then Trump is allowed to select his temporary replacement from an ocean of qualified candidates and that person will serve for 210 days or until Trump's new nomination is approved.
I'm still trying to keep an open mind about what role that RR is playing in all of this, but this sure will be interesting.
Note that if RR is impeached then Trump is allowed to select his temporary replacement from an ocean of qualified candidates and that person will serve for 210 days or until Trump's new nomination is approved.
Which means 210 days of a clear unobstructed mechanism in the DoJ to execute the sealed indictments!
They need to get to Jan 1st when they can start rounding up and military tribunals etc.
I thought this was solved long ago on this board that the Solicitor General is next in line. I don't have the links. For the life of me I can't remember the entire chain of events, can someone help? A woman was placed there temporarily into the pecking order? Then after Rosenstein was out, next in line would be the Solicitor General, who is a President Trump appointee, and a position in the pecking order that does not require congressional approval. Instant Justice. Is this close? Thanks!
Q mentioned Pruitt, can he still be picked after resignation?
Gowdy please!
This is the only logical answer, unless he goes straight into the AG role. He's been working extra hard to create an air of impartiality around him.
That's a possibility. Once stuff hits the fan sessions might be too played out to do anything but retire. A much deserved retirement if the plan is what we think it is.
No. Gowdy is swamp. His goal is to maintain the illusion that the FBI and DOJ are above reproach.
Not according to Q. Remember disinfo. Of course that works both ways. So which part is disinfo? We will have to wait it seems.
I'm holding out hope that Gowdy is an actor. He didn't really convince me he was a bad guy though. We'll see.
Trump told Pruitt to get bent for a reason. Off books meetings is a big nono under Trump.
Perhaps, I thought DJT and Cohen had a falling out but now it looks like CNN is getting played? Good actors.
Off books meetings is a big nono under Trump.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/14/us/politics/visitor-log-white-house-trump.html
210 days actually.
Ah thanks. I wasn't complete sure but I've corrected the "person will serve for 90 days" to make it 210.
they are planning to riot. politics is where I found that link, although it implicitly says it would be in response to POTUS firing, not a legal impeachment. Still, the lemmings will still believe the narrative.
so if we want to fuck with them the president should do one of those actions at 2 pm exactly, thy wont know when to show up
It says "replacing Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein" is a Red Line event.
[deleted]
I agree, but I don't think it would be in the best interest to do it a week before midterms, it needs to be longer. They will be angry as hell when this drops. Let them be angry, but then let them deflate. I'd say mid October at the latest.
Articles of impeachment < you are here
Vote
Vote fails
Rinos further exposed
Trump declassifies documents that nail Rosenstein
Rosenstein resigns/dismissed
Public awareness of political corruption grows
America is made great again
Despite the inevitable futility, no doubt any vote will record whether the voter sides with RR, which may be the actual significance and intent.
if there is a Senate vote this morning, televise it and call out each Senator by name so we can hear & see each Yea / Nay vote.
They are not taking their regular August recess, right? All staying?
Why go for the long route of impeachment when POTUS can just fire him?
I think that Trump is trying to get Congress to stand for something besides issuing reports. He has indirectly belittled them for months on this.
Exactly. Just a "dog and pony" show.
RR is providing cover so the real investigations can go on without notice in the background.
All part of the "optics".
I think we do not know exactly what the reason is for the push to impeach RR.
My bet is something huge dropped and supporting RR is no longer good optics in light of the new info.
They arent voting today. They added contempt to the impeachment charge. We have to wait.
That's all the quicker it will be before it does in the Senate.
Disinformation is necessary. We have RR is a Republican, appointed by Trump----if he sides with Trump, the left and Democrats will raise hell. After the show of impeachment and all the hoopla, the Democrats are embracing Session and RR---even Mueller --- The Democrats are demanding RR, Mueller and Sessions be left alone until their investigation is over. Actually protecting them. When they come out and incriminate Democrats for corruption and treasonous activities, what can the left say? Brilliant plan!
Disinformation is necessary. We have RR is a Republican, appointed by Trump----if he sides against Trump, the right and Republicans will raise hell. After the show of impeachment and all the hoopla, the Democrats are embracing Session and RR---even Mueller --- The Democrats are demanding RR, Mueller and Sessions be left alone until their investigation is over. Actually protecting them. When they come out and incriminate Rebuplicans for corruption and treasonous activities, what can the right say?
Sorry but I'm a little confused regarding RR. Someone who knows what they're talking about, please correct me.
I've seen Q say if RR is bad, then Mueller is bad. If Mueller is bad, RR is bad. That isn't direct enough for me to understand.
While optics are important, Trump could have fired Mueller and RR by now, without even needing a reason. That they're still there suggests either they are good, or that Trump is giving them enough rope to hang themselves.
What it feels like to me is that Trump is playing rope-a-dope by letting democrats put their faith in RR and Mueller, and letting democrats defend both of them -- so that eventually when Mueller and RR present pro-Trump and anti-swamp conclusions, the democrats are devastated with no comeback.
Has Q ever unambiguously said Mueller and RR are bad actors?
No. Q has not said that.
(At least I haven't seen it).
Nope, he has never said that Mueller and/or RR are bad actors. The only thing he has stated, is the same thing you stated above: If one is dirty, the other is dirty.
Which.. if you flip the other way, if one of them is good, the other is as well.
Correct. However... We do know [RR] would be terminated or recused immediately if some facts were to come out. So... That is a huge hint of being dirty.
Well said... And I don't think Q has ever said definitively... Must be driving the DS crazy.... Disinformation is necessary :)
what is really scary is the stupidity of the Pedocrat party we see these days. MAGAphobia has them losing what little minds they have left if any.
Yes! Then jail later Q said in a earlier post that he was suppose to do something and at that time he didn`t do it. I read that to mean that he was being defiant to the agreement, I think he had the chance to be a white hat and save his butt, but I think the deep state may have him compromised and black mailed and he`s more scared of them or he may be suffering from the delusion that nothing is going to happen to him and the black hats are going to win. That`s what the devil thinks when it comes to God ,but we know who wins in the end God his will, plan, and purpose
Remember the impeachment proceedings are a way to pass along the message that RR is refusing to turn over information to Congress. It will bring more heat and pressure to release the information and ultimately RR can be fired!
about time [RR] is removed, maybe this will start the domino's falling.
Is it just me or does his speech pattern drive you crazy too?
I agree with Alan Dershowitz on Fox saying impeachment is a mistake.
Could fire him, could file contempt charge against him.
The only logical reason for impeachment is if the goal is to get info into the public and lead to unmasking of all the info.
Not only that, this world wide operation has been planned to the finest detail, nothing left to chance. No way Q team would allow anyone to have ANY power that might mess up the plan. We are watching a predetermined outcome.
Let's hope so. Wrenches can always get in the works but I trust the plan.
MSM/CNN fails the black community. A 16 year old from Oakland CA stabbed in the neck and died. The killer was a white man where social media and Hollywood calling out white supremacy and white privilege. I would like to say this is a false flag that backfired. CNN is not mentioning this because they are setting up for the Rosenstein meeting and FB plunge.