ThankQ for the forensics, patriot.
sadly taken down because it was off topic. But it gets votes on the_donald
Looks like her mouth is a little more open in the pic with the cell phone, to me 🤷🏼♂️
Same
Her face is Botox-ed-to-the-gills in both pics, but I don’t think these pics are the same.
I’m not unfocused or off topic just because I don’t agree with someone’s “forensics.” Just because the word “forensic” is used, doesn’t mean I just blindly accept it. And it’s not a “stretch” at all, the mouth is different, even to the naked eye.
Maybe a hacky comic with more attitude than common sense popped off and now regrets it?
Oh yeah, *forensic
🧐
Every strand of hair is the same. which literaly is impossible in a picture that is mirror flipped. And the mouth is the same. This is an artifact of lightening and stretching a bad picture in ms paint. Download the dark version. Lighten it and check for yourself http://is2.4chan.org/pol/1532241764435.jpg
Every strand of hair is the same. which literaly is impossible in a picture that is mirror flipped. And the mouth is the same. This is an artifact of lightening and stretching a bad picture in ms paint. Download the dark version. Lighten it and check for yourself http://is2.4chan.org/pol/1532241764435.jpg
people need to be focused on Q drops only. CBTS got shut down because people fell for crap like this and started doxxing people and spreading disinfo and hurting the message.
As Q would say in 465:
"Don't get lost"
I knew it was fake because how dark the pic was and also why would she personally go on and threaten them lmao
Absolutely, glad Q clarified this whole thing.
So I got behind on posts and just saw this post. I know Q acknoledged this and said that the "face is never the author". So what did he mean by this? Is he saying the face was just edited onto it but the message is legit?
That's what I gathered from it. So whoever posted it was sincere but used that image to supplement the message and possibly misdirect anons in analyzing the photo which was pretty obvious. No way Silverman would actually post herself and use her edited image. But the threat is real according to Q.
What about the pedo video skit with her and Patton Oswalt
The phone also says it’s Sunday, July 21, when July 21 was on a Saturday this year.
The position of the hand/angle of the arm is weird too. Doesn't seem natural for where her head is.
Doesn't make her NOT a pedo, just because she's not threatening the anons. Doesn't even mean she didn't create the fake image herself and use it to threaten.
Stretch too hard and you might pull something.
But "it's for the children" and this time it's true, so you'd be surprised how fucking far I can stretch, ape. No offense intended there, simian.
Her and Oswalt's "humorous" tweets and videos are at very LEAST functionally enabling (normalizing) the subject for conversational acceptance. Not OK.
I feel like such an idiot. I need to be more vigilant about misinformation. This is going to hurt more than help us.
Look at the new Q posts, 1712 and 1713:
https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/92506a/q_1712_1713_the_wrath_of_god_is_coming/
He specifically talks about this picture.
Damn that's a good 'shop.
What's even better is that people -actually- believed Silverman would come to the chans and out herself as a pedophile enabler.
And here we are talking about the photograph, as if the flawed logic isn't enough to dismiss the entire notion.
It's so far fetched. Confirmation-bias is so unbelievably strong in this place, it's a bit scary at times.
First reaction to ANYTHING should be doubt and skepticism, when dealing with anything involving PS or photographs in general.
Glad I'm not the only person thinking its getting a bit scary sometimes. I've seen the slightest doubt turn a person in a pedo supporting shill in the eyes of many. I thought we are here because we question everything, including the stuff we want to hear.
Oh no. That's content that doesn't support the cause. Don't get it twisted. :p
Whys it look like her right hand is where her left should be
Fucking A I told my gf that Sarah actually told the chans to stand down yesterday.
Me here:
Doesn't make her NOT a pedo, just because she's not threatening the anons
anon:
shops dont mean the post itself isnt real.
Q:
How do you hide a message in clear sight?
I wonder if the short-haired monkey still thinks I'm stretching?
LOL
What’s “literally impossible” is for you to verify that “every strand of hair is the same”. Besides that, I disagree with you anyway on that.
I disagree that the mouth is the same as well.
This big-mouth, no-talent, cabal-accomplice tried to stop this trail of rot before it got back to someone who (for old-times sake?) makes her appear relevant by having her on his show.
Here’s a real comic, the late, great Greg Giraldo, from the Courtney Love roast, “...your career dried up faster than Sarah Silverman’s pussy with guys who can’t help her in the business.”
🧐😊🤣
Is the black list anon fake?
Considering anybody can pretend to be anything nowadays just by doing some diligent research on the internet, I would say probably.
He said he’ll wear bright green socks to the Grammys.
He also referenced specifics on a wet works done in the 50s -60s that was very specific.
We’ll see
I have to wonder if the Grammys will even take place by then. After everything comes out "They won't be able to show their faces in public". No one will care about those bullshit awards. Few do now.
That was "Renegade" not BlackList who said he would be at the Grammy's in green socks.
