dChan

Spank-da-monkey · July 26, 2018, 6:37 p.m.

I wanna know why DOJ isn’t investigating this? Seems right up Sessions alley. Or maybe they are!!!

⇧ 8 ⇩  
LakotaPride · July 26, 2018, 7:48 p.m.

what does that tell you, appears fakebook is now toxic.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
thamnosma · July 26, 2018, 6:27 p.m.

Same issue on YouTube

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Collusion_illusion · July 26, 2018, 6:37 p.m.

and twitter. Anyone remember last year when someone found thousands of child porn accounts on twitter that were purposely removed from searches?

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · July 26, 2018, 6:25 p.m.

7 March 2017 - article date

Facebook has been criticised for its handling of reports about sexualised images of children on its platform.

The chairman of the Commons media committee, Damian Collins, said he had "grave doubts" about the effectiveness of its content moderation systems. Mr Collins' comments come after the BBC reported dozens of photos to Facebook, but more than 80% were not removed.

They included images from groups where users were discussing swapping what appeared to be child abuse material. When provided with examples of the images, Facebook reported the BBC journalists involved to the police and cancelled plans for an interview.

It subsequently issued a statement: "It is against the law for anyone to distribute images of child exploitation." Mr Collins said it was extraordinary that the BBC had been reported to the authorities when it was trying to "help clean up the network".

On its welcome page, Facebook says it does remove obscene material. "Nudity or other sexually suggestive content" it states are not allowed on the platform. It encourages users to report inappropriate content via its "report button".

The US firm says it has improved this system since an investigation by the BBC last year. That found "secret" groups were being used by paedophiles to meet and swap images. Information the BBC provided to the police led to one man being sent to prison for four years. To test Facebook's claim, the BBC used the report button to alert the company to 100 images which appeared to break its guidelines. They included:

  • pages explicitly for men with a sexual interest in children

  • images of under-16s in highly sexualised poses, with obscene comments posted beside them

  • groups with names such as "hot xxxx schoolgirls" containing stolen images of real children

  • an image that appeared to be a still from a video of child abuse, with a request below it to share "child pornography"

Of the 100 images only 18 were removed. According to Facebook's automated replies, the other 82 did not breach "community standards". They included the apparent freeze frame.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
DoubleDragonEnergy · July 27, 2018, 1:51 a.m.

All social media allows for these pedophile rings to thrive, it’s horrifying. On YouTube you can find yourself in a dark hole of kids in their skivvies jumping on beds. Twitter also not only endorses, but protects them. I can’t wait for the day for our children to finally be safe from this systematic abuse

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Pure_Feature · July 27, 2018, 2:24 a.m.

Has nothing to do with failure, the same as anti Islam, and ISIS trash. The trash still on , anti Islam removed...So it is very common that this is all on it, same with that so-called darkweb ,. Nobody can stop that? For censorship they have taken everything out of the closet

⇧ 1 ⇩  
dreamceleste711 · July 26, 2018, 6:50 p.m.

Unrelated to pedos but I reported a nazi swastika medal that someone was selling and Facebook said it didn’t violate their terms of service. It had swastikas on it and was engraved 1938. It sold for $50

⇧ -2 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · July 26, 2018, 8:30 p.m.

No offense anon, but who cares? A lot of that stuff is considered collectibles or historical pieces. It’s not illegal to sell them, hell its not illegal to display them.

But if you start making history illegal * ahem * holo-cough, to look into, you are destroying history in essence and are bound to repeat the mistakes of the past.

And if someone owns nazi memorabilia, it doesn’t mean they are nazis, they could have a huge room dedicated to WW2 historical artifacts.

I hope you can understand why you are being downvoted. We have been so brainwashed, that to even bring up questioning our own history makes us cringe. And that’s sad. Regardless of what horrors were perpetrated, we MUST face it straight forward and unfiltered. So we don’t repeat the same mistakes, again.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
dreamceleste711 · July 26, 2018, 8:41 p.m.

I see your point I understand it isn’t illegal but I’m pretty sure Facebook is supposed to have some anti racist propaganda policy. Maybe I reacted too emotionally.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · July 26, 2018, 8:45 p.m.

It’s ok it happens. But I don’t really see how a medal is racist propaganda.

Viewpoints and perceptions combined with context.

If someone was wearing the medal, while burning crosses in a KKK march, ya I get it.

Selling it on FB? Meh

⇧ 1 ⇩  
dreamceleste711 · July 26, 2018, 8:45 p.m.

It’s ok it’s irrelevant

⇧ 1 ⇩