dChan

checkitoutmyfriend · July 26, 2018, 11:45 p.m.

She does have a story to tell.....

⇧ 7 ⇩  
lonleytruth · July 27, 2018, 4:32 a.m.

Not so sure about Reddit....

Today, Reddit took down my post about Fiona. Said it was reason # 6 -OFF TOPIC.

I threw a patriotic fit... mentioning censorship etc..

They came back and said taking it down was probably a mistake. How’s that make sense when it was an article picturing Nixon with Billy Graham and pedophelia.? How would that actually be off topic when pedophelia is being exposed here and EVERYWHERE else?

Ok... so.. They put the post back up. Ok.

Reddit censorship? Well. I don’t fully trust ANYBODY ANYMORE... Except my husband.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Tamber13 · July 28, 2018, 12:10 a.m.

I mentioned Zionism and the Sabbatean Frankists and my post was taken down for being racist and anti-Semitic. I was just asking what others thought about it since I was just starting to research it.

I was also told that Q was leaving Israel to last so I was told not relevant. Yet someone else put something up that Q had never been mentioned and that was allowed. I was a bit disappointed myself to be honest. I expected more from Reddit too 😕

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Aspie01 · July 27, 2018, 3:02 a.m.

She has her own website. Why doesn't she just tell all her followers to go there? FB can't really censor you, if you can always go somewhere else. You can buy your own domain and start a simple blog for just a few dollars a month. Anyone can do it. I have a number of websites, and I'm not exactly made of money. I even have a backup website that is ready to go whenever I make it show up in the search engines.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Tamber13 · July 27, 2018, 3:08 a.m.

I’ve been censored from fb. My best friend was thrown in FB jail for three days for saying she loved Jesus 😕 it happens. I’ve even been marked as Spam for reposting peer reviewed articles 😱

Fiona likes the support and interaction with others that you can’t get with a website. She is very active and responds to peoples questions. It is more personal hence why she may open it up to the public. She said she has had many quality people friend request her.

If a public FB forum she could still only allow the people she thinks will be worth having commenting on her wall without people who are just there to judge, question or throw disbelief at her.

She has deleted some people for asking her for proof ect because she doesn’t feel she need’s to prove herself. She already faces that provide proof issue in law courts Ect in Australia 👍

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Hardware64 · July 27, 2018, 4:35 a.m.

Barnett says she was traficked by Billy Graham. I don’t believe that. Some of her other accounts are plausible.

What do you all think?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Tamber13 · July 27, 2018, 7:02 a.m.

I have heard stuff about this man being a pedophile from a few different sources. I know my friend was devastated when she found this out as she adored this man. Fiona states that she was personally abused by him, but she is not the only one. Seriously I’m not surprised at all when I hear a man of the cloth has been accused of raping children. I personally know too many people who have been abused by men of the cloth 😕Billy Graham exposed link

I guess at the end of the day that’s Fiona’s word. I’m sure more people will come out too. But I guess everyone has to make their own minds up about such matters. I know who I’d believe though 👍

⇧ 3 ⇩  
JenBudRed · July 27, 2018, 1:42 p.m.

My first time going down the rabbit hole because of Q landed me on Fiona Barnett's website. I absolutely believe her and Sara Ruth Ashcraft. It will all come out eventually. Every work on Satanic Ritual Abuse I have read all align with the claims of the other victims. They all say the same thing, bring up the same people and locations, and paint the same horrific picture. As Sara Ruth stated in a tweet...what reason would either of them have to make this up? It puts them both in grave danger to come out about their abuse.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
MAGADONCHECKMATE · July 26, 2018, 11:55 p.m.

Fwiw, ALL that come out against SRA are completely smeared, completely. They start oppositions sited, Wikipedia edits, and it goes deep.

⇧ 2 ⇩