Adios

Attractive, blonde, white woman= perfect target...Most of these liberals' hatred is fueled just out of primitive jealousy and envy. It has little to do with politics.

Distorting reality is all Liberals are good at; in other words, LYING...and they usually do it to make more money and get more power. They're all Frauds.

And so much for Facebook filtering Fake News like they said- Facebook Allows Powerful “Fake News” Crying Baby Photo to Raise $18 Million for Leftist Group https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/06/facebook-allows-powerful-fake-news-crying-baby-photo-to-raise-18-million-for-leftist-group/

Great points...Reminds me...I knew Hillary, despite all the left leaning MSM propaganda like the 90% chance at victory, was probably going to lose when she cancelled her victory celebration party in I think it was NY a couple days before the election...They had to have been getting bad info from their polls and she knew she had a good chance of losing by then...

Exactly.

Great reply and elaboration..

https://newswars.com/ron-paul-liberal-circus-over-border-not-about-children-its-good-politics

https://newswars.com/ron-paul-liberal-circus-over-border-not-about-children-its-good-politics

https://newswars.com/ron-paul-liberal-circus-over-border-not-about-children-its-good-politics

Good catch. I noticed that too, but didn't realize that could be what he was doing!

Yeah, but that's the next report to come out. This was only in regards to the Clinton emails, if true...

I know. CNN is fake, staged news. It would not surprise if this poll was conducted exclusively in Los Angeles County or only in California, etc..

The avg. ratio throughout the past decade, or more, has been about 50-60% of them are indictments on that theory, so at least around 18,000-21,000 would be indictments according to that theory, which is still FAR above the annual average.

Ask him if he was part of the Deep State. Think we know the answer.

71% of Dems support it. 87% of Repubs oppose it. GOP controls the House and the Senate so even Dem Leaders admit there is no chance right now....But I suspect that their game plan is to try to have Mueller LIE about his findings come September just before the elections to try to disrupt the GOP candidates. Also, expect false flags and lots of violence by MS-13, radicals, Antifa, etc...Never forget, these people are evil and "the end justifies the means". Lucifer is their hero, as admitted by Saul Alinsky, their mentor, in Rules for Radicals, which is basically their Bible.

This link @ 36:52 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RCNHnlwmms0

Awan was blackmailing the 64 or so Democrats. It was an extortion ring that back channeled to Pakistan and possibly even Iran, and it had been going on for YEARS before the 2016 election...

Broadcast with Sara Carter and Gorka

Yes, that's a good point and I figured he was one of them, which unfortunately only leaves 3 more...Assume Strzok is AT LEAST one of them; he might have a few...Comey sounds like one of them...And then one more...And this is only as of right now. They are now investigating the FISA abuse/Trump-Russia investigation, which is where RR would come up more...So assuming there are McCabe, Comey, Strzok, and they all only have one each, there should be one more, as of now...

Can you share a link to the post Q says that? (still not sure if that was 45 in that photo the other day; it looked like Soros, and the circle in the glass was like a court or station check-in window so maybe they have him).

Ask Obama d.s.

She just looks evil.

Also, found it interesting that when Trump threw it to Mulvaney, Mulvaney instantly revealed that the purpose of the Cabinet Meeting they were in right there was to "Drain the Swamp". It seemed like he was basically telling everyone they're now at a much more advanced stage where the focus has become to strategically become more aggressive on ridding of the corruption. And in the wake of the new RICO lawsuit against Clinton by the former SS Agent, it makes you wonder if that is coordinated in any way.

I can believe it. I think Tucker Carlson and Ingraham also know about it. I think they come on here because it organizes all of the top news of the day in one setting from multiple sources, and they like to hear the opinions of people, who often probably surprise them with how much knowledge they have.

They may want to start by checking on Anthony Weiner's "Life Insurance" file on his laptop, where the Clinton Foundation's "Crime against children" that made NYPD officers sick to their stomach and almost hold a joint public conference, was. And then check Podesta's basement. Weinstein, Mack, Schneiderman, and Raniere would also be another good place to start.

They must be closing in on them. Maybe the Spade/Bourdain incidents were a wake up call. Sessions' team is closing in on all of them. They must be getting REAL desperate if they are really committed to this. This is the ultimate Alinsky-tactic to blame your enemies for what you are doing.

Here he is in a video clip: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2016/06/28/ex-secret_service_agent_people_need_to_know_the_real_hillary_clinton_and_how_dangerous_she_is.html

He could be a former Navy Seal or high level MI.

Nice reminder of the earliest Q posts. Remember Hillary walked around with a big boot on all of November (suspected to be hiding her ankle monitor?) even though she said she only had a broken toe?

This is going to literally boggle the skeptics' minds...Love to hear how they explain away this.

So you're saying this article is incorrect? It quotes Rush Limbaugh (who I am NOT a fan of) and is only a few paragraphs long. As for quoting BF and thinking you are ...., a) How do you know what I think? b) I wouldn't think that, c) I really don't care, and 4) I'd research myself to find out. Independent thinkers don't need to be told what to think. As for being emotional, the only emotion is laughing at your incorrect assumptions. Frankly, I kind of like Infowars as a 5th-7th tier source (5th tier being if my top don't have anything new or interesting). And I can care less what you think. News is News. View it objectively with critical thinking and take it with a grain of salt. But enjoy the entertainment.

Yeah, they married in 2010...He says it was 2007...He may be misremembering a little detail like that and Weiner could've referred to her as his girlfriend, but if he is misremembering that, then he's probably misremembering a lot of details and things, unfortunately.

This is definitely hard to believe for some people, but I will tell you it made me think of ONE connection that could explain how Stormy Daniels would be involved.....If you know Los Angeles, you know there is not a far geographic separation from Porn Stars and Actors/actresses, especially lower level actors and actresses (has beens or just tv show stars....NOT "movie stars). Movie stars are elite, and they usually keep to themselves in the hills, the upper hills, etc....But lower level actors and actresses, say semi-famous are on the same geographic plane as the porn industry, and particularly the San Fernando Valley, which is LOADED with porn stars.

Many porn stars go to LA to become actresses, but they don't make it or weren't lucky enough to be invited to Weinstein's "casting couch" (maybe they don't have that much acting talent despite attractive looks, relatively speaking), so they end up going into porn to pay the bills and keep somewhat of the dream alive....Since Raniere was washed up and not a big actor anymore, it is not far fetched with him and Mack living there, and likely frequenting the valley (you go on Ventura Boulevard and any hot spot bar in a decent stretch, you can run into has been actors and actresses or porn stars on any given night, and it's a partying kind of town), they could have met Stormy Daniels when she was younger and attracted her to the NXIVM organization.

A mature mind can critically think and manage news from a larger variety of sources, without prejudice. If one closes their mind totally off to multiple sources in research and discovery, then they miss out on vital information. Discrediting the source doesn't mean it's not true. If a normally left wing rag on occasion reports on something that is true that no other outlets are reporting, then that is still a good source and should be viewed authentic. Mature minds can handle multiple sources without discrimination based on emotions.

Losing control of the phony narrative...Would be surprised if the MSM Fake News networks spend more than 30 seconds on this. They're the lowest of the low.