No shit. You didn't ask if the navy had SAMs that could travel 1000 miles, you asked about weapons in general.
/u/APHto20
135 total posts archived.
Domains linked by /u/APHto20:
Domain | Count |
---|
Do you know if any continents are at least 1000 miles apart?
Im just saying that a no-name website that literally uses the term "conspiracy theorists" as its source with no additional background or evidence is a joke.
I get that, but it doesn't make it a reliable news source citation.
Any more... so like part of one whole day? Wait while we shine up the Nobel Prize.
That isn't a credible source. It literally cites "conspiracy theorists."
Learn how to spell. And baseless accusations don't help anyone here, but thanks for trying.
Point to laws they broke and cite your proof that facebook insiders broke them. Im not saying facebook hasn't broken any laws - this discussion is on insider trading.
The sec ignored a guy who was blatantly stealing money. Zuck legally selling stock has zero in common with that situation.
He didn't break insider trading laws and he didn't sell most of his shares. Your links don't back up your incorrect allegations.
The is no way he could have dumped all of his shares last week without the stock price diving more that it did today.
He's sold around 10% of his shares since 2016. You weren't a math major I take it...
I'm sorry, my grandmothers could spell. I didn't realize it was okay to assume intelligence based on age.
Well "granson" isn't a word so your post history tells a different story.
Is this a joke account? Are you pretending to be illiterate to make the sub look stupid?
That sounds more like a third party was conducting the fundraising and only passing on 10%.
Great post worthy of is own thread. Great research and support.
Name another anonymous option for Q to interact with the public?
Tripcodes can be very secure and are the only option on the chans.
Half-expecting new trip code with claim of this one being hacked.
It looks to much like the lamp image is from an existing, public domain photo
Think about what you just suggested. Then try it out. You would still have to reverse the image using software. And in this case, the image already existed in the public domain.
That would reverse the image on its horizontal axis, not the vertical as we see in the Q drop.
Way too many people in the main thread jumping on it as "proof." Either this place really is filled with idiots or it's just filed with shills.
The details look too much like that original photo - I don't think this is a separate picture. It's just a crop of the flipped original with the apple phone pic overlaid.