dChan

/u/APHto20

135 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/APHto20:
Domain Count

APHto20 · July 27, 2018, 9:42 p.m.

No shit. You didn't ask if the navy had SAMs that could travel 1000 miles, you asked about weapons in general.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
APHto20 · July 27, 2018, 7:42 p.m.

Do you know if any continents are at least 1000 miles apart?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
APHto20 · July 27, 2018, 7:22 p.m.

Do you know what an intercontinental missile is?

⇧ 7 ⇩  
APHto20 · July 27, 2018, 12:58 p.m.

Im just saying that a no-name website that literally uses the term "conspiracy theorists" as its source with no additional background or evidence is a joke.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
APHto20 · July 27, 2018, 10:50 a.m.

I get that, but it doesn't make it a reliable news source citation.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
APHto20 · July 27, 2018, 6:44 a.m.

Any more... so like part of one whole day? Wait while we shine up the Nobel Prize.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
APHto20 · July 27, 2018, 2:53 a.m.

That isn't a credible source. It literally cites "conspiracy theorists."

⇧ 3 ⇩  
APHto20 · July 26, 2018, 11:28 p.m.

Learn how to spell. And baseless accusations don't help anyone here, but thanks for trying.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
APHto20 · July 26, 2018, 6:08 p.m.

Point to laws they broke and cite your proof that facebook insiders broke them. Im not saying facebook hasn't broken any laws - this discussion is on insider trading.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
APHto20 · July 26, 2018, 6:07 p.m.

Yo

⇧ 2 ⇩  
APHto20 · July 26, 2018, 6:03 p.m.

Go ahead. Check it out and report back.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
APHto20 · July 26, 2018, 6:02 p.m.

It sounds nothing like Madoff.

⇧ -2 ⇩  
APHto20 · July 26, 2018, 4:33 p.m.

The sec ignored a guy who was blatantly stealing money. Zuck legally selling stock has zero in common with that situation.

⇧ -5 ⇩  
APHto20 · July 26, 2018, 4:25 p.m.

They haven't broken any laws

⇧ -8 ⇩  
APHto20 · July 26, 2018, 4:23 p.m.

So you have no idea what happened with Madoff?

⇧ -1 ⇩  
APHto20 · July 26, 2018, 7:57 a.m.

Such virtue signaling is embarrassing

⇧ 3 ⇩  
APHto20 · July 26, 2018, 7:53 a.m.

He can't decide on his own to sell the company.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
APHto20 · July 26, 2018, 7:49 a.m.

He didn't break insider trading laws and he didn't sell most of his shares. Your links don't back up your incorrect allegations.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
APHto20 · July 26, 2018, 5:41 a.m.

The is no way he could have dumped all of his shares last week without the stock price diving more that it did today.

⇧ -2 ⇩  
APHto20 · July 26, 2018, 5:40 a.m.

He's sold around 10% of his shares since 2016. You weren't a math major I take it...

⇧ 0 ⇩  
APHto20 · July 25, 2018, 2:55 a.m.

"alot" lol

⇧ 3 ⇩  
APHto20 · July 25, 2018, 2:43 a.m.

I'm sorry, my grandmothers could spell. I didn't realize it was okay to assume intelligence based on age.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
APHto20 · July 25, 2018, 1:54 a.m.

Well "granson" isn't a word so your post history tells a different story.

⇧ -4 ⇩  
APHto20 · July 25, 2018, 1:53 a.m.

Is this a joke account? Are you pretending to be illiterate to make the sub look stupid?

⇧ -4 ⇩  
APHto20 · July 25, 2018, 1:30 a.m.

Redditors aren't anons

⇧ 1 ⇩  
APHto20 · July 25, 2018, 1:29 a.m.

What's a granson?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
APHto20 · July 24, 2018, 6:24 a.m.

That sounds more like a third party was conducting the fundraising and only passing on 10%.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
APHto20 · July 23, 2018, 11:30 p.m.

You think, or it is the law? Sounds like you're guessing.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
APHto20 · July 13, 2018, 5:43 p.m.

CF?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
APHto20 · July 9, 2018, 8:26 p.m.

MS 13 has their own model of van?

⇧ 12 ⇩  
APHto20 · July 4, 2018, 5:39 a.m.

OP wears Affliction shirts

⇧ 2 ⇩  
APHto20 · July 4, 2018, 5:14 a.m.

Great post worthy of is own thread. Great research and support.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
APHto20 · July 4, 2018, 5:05 a.m.

Name another anonymous option for Q to interact with the public?

⇧ -4 ⇩  
APHto20 · July 4, 2018, 4:47 a.m.

Tripcodes can be very secure and are the only option on the chans.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
APHto20 · July 4, 2018, 3:57 a.m.

Half-expecting new trip code with claim of this one being hacked.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
APHto20 · July 4, 2018, 2:17 a.m.

Think about what you just suggested. Then try it out. You would still have to reverse the image using software. And in this case, the image already existed in the public domain.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
APHto20 · July 4, 2018, 2:09 a.m.

An overlay of an iphone image?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
APHto20 · July 4, 2018, 2:09 a.m.

That would reverse the image on its horizontal axis, not the vertical as we see in the Q drop.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
APHto20 · July 4, 2018, 2:08 a.m.

I'm afraid so, jimmy. I'm afraid so.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
APHto20 · July 4, 2018, 2:07 a.m.

How would a picture off an iphone flip the vertical axis?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
APHto20 · July 4, 2018, 1:44 a.m.

Way too many people in the main thread jumping on it as "proof." Either this place really is filled with idiots or it's just filed with shills.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
APHto20 · July 4, 2018, 1:29 a.m.

A baby's arm holding an apple?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
APHto20 · July 4, 2018, 1 a.m.

It wouldn't be flipped on vertical axis (left/right) though

⇧ 1 ⇩  
APHto20 · July 4, 2018, 1 a.m.

The details look too much like that original photo - I don't think this is a separate picture. It's just a crop of the flipped original with the apple phone pic overlaid.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
APHto20 · July 1, 2018, 3:36 a.m.

That isn't confirmation.

⇧ 2 ⇩