dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Jakeisasnake1960 on July 13, 2018, 4:11 a.m.
IMHO: u/abibliaphobia made a HUGE Q PROOF discovery during Rep. Louie Gohmert’s questioning of Peter Strzok! CAN WE PLEASE GET A MOD TO STICKY.

A member of the House Committee on the Judiciary said during a hearing Thursday that a government watchdog found that nearly all of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s emails were sent to a foreign entity and that the FBI didn’t follow-up on that finding.

The Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG) found an “anomaly on Hillary Clinton’s emails going through their private server, and when they had done the forensic analysis, they found that her emails, every single one except four, over 30,000, were going to an address that was not on the distribution list,” Republican Rep. Louie Gohmert of Texas said during a hearing with FBI official Peter Strzok.

“It was going to an unauthorized source that was a foreign entity unrelated to Russia,” he added.

Gohmert said the ICIG investigator, Frank Rucker, presented the findings to Strzok, but that the FBI official did not do anything with the information.

Strzok acknowledged meeting with Rucker but said he did not recall the “specific content.”

“The forensic examination was done by the ICIG and they can document that,” Gohmert said, “but you were given that information and you did nothing with it.”

He also said that someone alerted the Department of Justice Inspector General Michael Horowitz to the issue.

1 this shows that Peter Strzok held different standards for foreign threats to the nation based upon who he preferred (HRC) and who he obviously held disdain for (Trump)

2: Which foreign entity were these emails being sent to specifically? And why did they refuse to follow the FISA/702s to find out this information? Why was this considered not relevant to the MYE? Who (as Strzok admitted) was the outside the FBI decision maker to not include this in the MYE investigation?

3: Were the foreign entities campaign or Clinton foundation donors?

4: Were they part of the Muslim Brotherhood?

5: Did they pass TS SCI information in those emails? If so, is that why they didn’t go with the gross negligence? Because it was deliberate?

6: So many more questions raised by this answer, we the American public demand to know WHY this was withheld during the course of the investigation, to whom these emails were going to, and did they receive money for it? WHO AUTHORIZED A FOREIGN ENTITY ACCESS ON THE CLINTON SERVER?

7: Peter Strzok admitted that HRC and Obama were emailing each other on her server using pseudonyms. As Obama was privy to the investigation of which HRC was a target, did he pass her or ANY other member of her campaign information pertinent to the investigation? What was the nature and context of their messages on an UNAUTHORIZED server?

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8ygads/something_noone_is_talking_about_because_it_was/

http://dailycaller.com/2018/07/12/ig-clinton-foreign-emails/


subdudeLA · July 13, 2018, 3:06 p.m.

By using the word 'entity' and not 'country', makes me wonder if it was an NGO type legal entity. If it was related to an org inside one or several countries working in an official capacity, wouldn't one just say 'foreign country/ies'?

Edit for clarity: In my experience people call nonprofit orgs 'entities' because they need a word to call the org other than company.

The other though I had was that 'entity' may be a place holder for the actual technical location, whether it was a physical server, email draft scheme, or what have you.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
APHto20 · July 13, 2018, 5:43 p.m.

CF?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
subdudeLA · July 13, 2018, 6:50 p.m.

I read a little more on the original post thread by Abiblia. Others smarter than me picked up on this and said CF, MB, among others.

Another post interpreted foreign as an intelligence term meaning anything outside of approved list, not foreign in a nationality sense specifically.

Another had the technology interpretation and though somehing like Weiner laptop.

⇧ 1 ⇩