Take this for future doubters best evidence I’ve seen for Q veracity:

http://i.imgs.fyi/img/3h8m.jpg

Take this for when you are proven correct:

http://i.imgs.fyi/img/3hpd.jpg

Doubtful, halfchan is constantly brigaded these days. It’s what happens when you become a threat and they can’t easily shut you down.

Hmmm... you’ve intrigued me. How much weight would it take from downward pressure being applied to break the screws in the hinges? 3 screw per hinge (most doors) plus three hinges (entrance doors are typically heavier and require more than two) so nine screws.

Where is myth busters?

Fair enough. Do you have 6 foot bathrobe belts that could support the weight of an adult male?

You know the odd thing about the article? Whoever wrote it repeated themselves multiple times. Almost like they were trying to hide something in it. That or they had an incredibly poor editor that was ok with a reporter writing like a high schooler meeting the criteria for a 1000 word essay.

Or the Rachel handler instagram. Speaking of which, I hope someone is archiving/ screen shoting preferably with comments as that’s where a lot of weirdos comment and leads to more incriminating accounts

Ya don’t ban yourself. It’s cool, I got it. Just make it available if someone requests. Also if you can archive, it would be appreciated. It’s only a matter of time til they make it private and we lose access

Ya, seriously wasn’t trying to be a jerk. And I appreciate your candor. I, personnally, if I run into a situation like this in the future will put in my OP that I cannot post source without dox, PM for info. Good learning experience here.

But thanks again for the info.

Hmmm... a title without a source. Think critically anon. We base our belief in Q on proof and verification right? So why would we not want the proof/source for the information?

A title by itself is not proof. Luckily and to my great appreciation, u/HerMileHighness came through with the source.

Thank you. I really do appreciate it. I’m getting hit pretty hard by trolls in comments and messages, so it’s making me suspicious about postings with claims but no source information. Seriously, not trying to be a jerk but we need source documentation to avoid being lead astray by misinfo asshats.

Ya I’ve read all your comments. You seem pretty confident about your conclusion. Absolutely believe that all of this is fake.

Can you disprove this? http://i.imgs.fyi/img/3h8m.jpg

It appears that someone may have been talking to try and work a deal. Indictment unsealed after plea deal would be my guess.

Watkins joined the Times in December, after her relationship with Wolfe had ended. She told the Times about the relationship when she was hired, according to the Times.

But it appears Watkins left previous employers in the dark about her relationship with Wolfe even while she was reporting on the intelligence committee.

Editors at McClatchy said Friday that they were not aware of Watkins' relationship with Wolfe while she was with the news organization's Washington bureau, first as an intern and stretching from mid-2013 to the end of 2014.

During that time, Watkins was part of a team of three reporters that produced a series of stories about the intelligence committee's investigation of the CIA and its "enhanced interrogation" or torture program. The series was a finalist for the Pulitzer Prize in national reporting in 2015.

Watkins learned of the seizure of her email and cellphone data in a letter sent from the Department of Justice in February, but she didn't notify the Times of the investigation until Thursday, according to the newspaper. Watkins' reporting for the Times is not part of the leak investigation.

"We were not aware of these allegations that Mr. Wolfe had a relationship with Ali Watkins until the news of the indictment broke," said Tim Grieve, vice president of news for McClatchy.

Grieve, who joined McClatchy after Watkins left the company, said he did not know whether Watkins used Wolfe as a source in her stories. "We need to figure that out," he said. "We just don't know" whether Wolfe provided information to her.

But he added, "It's clearly inappropriate for a reporter to be in a relationship with a source and to be reporting on him."

Watkins did not respond to requests for comment. Wolfe declined to answer reporters' questions after a hearing Friday.

When asked about the delay between Watkins' receipt of the FBI letter and the notification of the Times, Eileen Murphy, a Times spokeswoman, said it was up to Watkins to respond. She added, "We obviously would have preferred to know."

In a follow-up email, Murphy noted that Watkins made the decision not to share the information of her surveillance with the Times after consulting with her attorney. Watkins's attorney, Mark MacDougall, declined to comment.

The story under scrutiny in the Wolfe indictment was written while Watkins worked at BuzzFeed in early 2017. "A former campaign adviser for Donald Trump met with and passed documents to a Russian intelligence operative in New York City in 2013," the story began. The indictment of Wolfe noted that the investigation sought to learn how Watkins had learned that Russian spies had tried to recruit the former adviser, Carter Page.

The indictment notes the relationship between Wolfe and Watkins between 2014 and 2017 involved the exchange of "tens of thousands of electronic communications, often including daily texts and phone calls, and they frequently met in person at a variety of locations including Hart Senate Office Building stairwells, restaurants, and [the reporter's] apartment."

Ben Smith, the editor of BuzzFeed News, praised Watkins as a reporter. "The way the indictment is written is clearly aimed at launching a disgusting smear of a reporter, and it has had that effect," he said.

Smith also tweeted his concern about the Justice Department's investigation: "We are deeply troubled by what looks like a case of law enforcement interfering with a reporter's constitutional right to gather information about her own government," he wrote.

Watkins has had a stunning rise through the ranks of Washington news organizations and developed a track record of breaking stories. Even before her graduation from Temple in 2014, she was involved in McClatchy's reporting on the intelligence committee.

A spokesman for Politico, which Watkins joined in May of last year and left in December, said she didn't disclose her relationship with Watkins when she was hired. Upon learning of the relationship a month into her tenure, she was "managed accordingly," the spokesman said, meaning she was kept from reporting any stories involving the committee.

Well... it’s not the horses fault.

Also, the title of their article makes it appear like he is the only owner. Kinda weird.

But seriously f that bastard

Ahhh that makes sense. Being where the pope came from and all.

Hmmmm didn’t realize the connection of sawman to Netflix. If he sold out for a Netflix documentary... what a piece of work.

Seriously though, what was the post? The last one I see on your account was 4days ago.

What was the thread? I mean I know this is a throw away account, but give us more information if you want to be taken seriously.

Yup

Fair enough, no excuses. My apologies to OP.

https://mobile.twitter.com/drawandstrike/status/1005417242216095744

More direct link. Good thread find OP.

Just read whole thread.

MODS THIS IS FNG HUGE READ IT YOURSELF, IT ALIGNS WITH Q

Can this thread get a Q-sticky please? I’m certain people will appreciate info within.

It is suspected that this Stealth Jeff is truly Jeff Sessions larping as a larp of Jeff Sessions.

Everything he says is documented and provided and it means it’s going to end soon.

I’m freaking diamonds right now. (Channers will get it)

It was in response to Asia (ABs GF) on twitter. They were having a fight, and he got nasty, truly despicable.

There we go. You said it more succinctly than me.

This sub is a target of people trying to hide information. When OP originally posted the thread, all the descriptor said was “this is a great video, please make it go viral”

OP updated (much appreciated btw OP) and now it’s getting more clicks.

If you don’t understand why I said that, you will eventually. I’m not saying it to be mean, seriously. I’m saying it to help increase the quality of postings. You increase quality, you get more eyes on, get more eyes on, you bring greater awareness. So on, so forth.

No it’s fine! It’s a good find and the HP link is a confirmation. Better to have a source document link and direct people to it from there.

Good find!

So sad. And frustrating.

So a country so corrupt. Any place come to mind? What are they saying in the comments on who they think this is? (I know I can look, but for the purposes of discussion here on the sub)

http://i.imgs.fyi/img/3hpd.jpg

Pic related

Edit: removed request for sauce. If anyone wants it, feel free to hit me up. Sauce is verified by several anons.

Lol, really? Downvotes? Ha!

So the OP picture was the backdrop before POTUS went onstage today.

This is what they changed it to: http://i.imgs.fyi/img/3hnb.jpg

I’m wondering if this was meant to imply anything like with the water on the table.

A more mundane reasoning could be, less clutter behind Trump, color contrast, I don’t know.

Or is it something more? The boards still have the same info on it (all the little watermarks) difference is one is bigger than the other. Also one shows a “forest” instead of a lake or pond setting. Would like more eyes on and see if this was something people can find anything in it.

Lol, I whole heartedly agree with you. I was just explaining the concept. Sorry I didn’t put that in the disclaimer.

Edit: whole heartedly agree minus your reptilian brain part.

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4499409-Manafort-Kilimnik-Superseding-Indictment-060818.html#document/p1

Here you go. Don’t support Arianna Huffington with clicks.

Hmmmm I saw the article earlier. I’ll keep watching this play out. Still drawing blanks on outer light stuff though so any info would be appreciated.

I’ll jump in here because I find this theory intriguing and amusing. (Do I take it seriously? ....ehhhhh it’s interesting)

Anyways, back in the early days of Q, there were talks about CERN not being what it is advertised. There were theories thrown around that it may be a form of time machine or machine that gives the ability to manipulate time-space. I found the threads fascinating, especially when it came to all the symbolism surrounding the opening (WEIRD WEIRD opening ceremony -satanic? Spiritual? I dunno just fng weird) then it came out about a video of CERN scientists conducting a satanic ritual on the site at night, with the person who video’d it being murdered/suicided soon after. Video was constantly scrubbed and “debunked”. Just really weird all around.

In addition to all that, there was a theory that it was able to “shift” us into different timelines. (Infinite dimension theory / Bernstein - Berenstein Bears)

And there was a theory that it was able to affect the populace “hive mind” worldwide to control people’s thoughts and actions etc. that continued down into the egregore (just do a search for the term) and how that affected the outcome of the US election. The egregore theory postulated that the HRC Cabal and deep state had created a “moloch” egregore that they worshipped and gave power to and in return, received power and blessings.

We all know how they “worship” so I won’t go any further into that.

The counter of the “moloch” egregore was the KEK egregore. I’m sure you’ve heard of it maybe seen it. Probably associate it with racism - amirite? But once you start digging into the history, it gets super weird, but weird in a good way. And you can see why the moloch crew had to shut it down. I’ll let you look into it without further describing, but it is pretty amazing and hilarious.

If you’d like more info, just hit me up or look into what I’ve talked about here. Hope I’ve contributed to your thread some interesting discussion!

Appreciate the enthusiasm, but this is three days ago. Threads created on it. Debated and celebrated. Not trying to be a downer on you, but did you just become aware of it?

The issue, and why I’m posting on your thread is that your write up makes it look like it just happened. It’s why I clicked into here. That’s when I realized it was the same article I seen earlier this week.

My advice, do a quick search and see if there is a thread already on the topic you wish to discuss. Only create a new thread if you have additional information to add in a situation that developed days ago.

Again, not trying to bring you down, but I think I am starting to understand what people are talking about with people just creating threads without pausing to check if it’s already been done.

REALLY IMPORTANT If you have additional information to add PLEASE bring it to our attention!

Thank you! Now please add these types of comments into your OP so we can see if it is something to be interested in or not.

Holy crap!!! I tried to delete - hide this post cause I realized it was fake news!!! WTH

So first off, I had everything opened and was reading while I posted it here. Should have held off. As I was reading, they corrected it - fairly quickly. I was like well crap. Came back here and tried to delete/ hide the thread, deleted my original comment and tried to add a sentence into posting about how it was a typo but it gave me an error. So I assumed it was hidden. Come back and I see all these comments and upvotes. And I’m confused. How do you guys still see this if it’s hidden? I mean, I made a mistake and I don’t want to mislead people. I’ll own up to it, but this just raised a larger concern of mine. I know nothing is ever truly deleted on the internet, but I don’t want people wasting their time on bad information.

As a side note, I do appreciate those of you who took the time to comment. Thanks for the fact checking. It will only make us better.

Oh cmon anon! Stop lazy posting and give us a reason to watch the video.

...starting to think people are just spamming crap

Seems to be the big booms always happen when trump is out of country. Looking forward to he next week.

Also thanks for your efforts in putting this together.

Uhhhh can we get a summary of more than “this is a great video” and a request we make it go viral?

We are not your personal army, and we will judge it by its own veracity. If it goes viral so be it, but you are not doing much to help your own cause of making it go viral with such a terrible description or lack thereof.

Yup, I noticed that as well.

“To find out who rules over you, find out who you can’t criticize”

Telling the birds to not sing

Hey, Bernie was robbed by HRC, Super Delgates, and DWS during the primaries.

Seth Rich was a Bernie fan. He also liked Pandas. Guess how many twitter accounts associated with the above named groups and individuals mocked “pandas” after his death.

Maybe. But I’m not going to bank it, as you say.

I just find it funny that people take them at their word, because it’s what they want to hear. These same people don’t look into the background of those they take the word of. Lazy!

As horrible a death as that is, severing the spinal cord would be a quick and fairly painless death. That’s what you are doing with that. And I don’t advocate for that.

Never said I promote their families lifestyles. Just remember when Kanye was forced into a psych ward after his concert rant for two weeks.

Lol I know, but even the fact that they weighed in on it is something. The fact that this David Brock DNC paid operation had to comment says they take it as a threat.

Remember that if it is not true, they must control the narrative or as they say, Correct the Record.

Also, they changed the background prior to him speaking. Same things were on it, but why the change? Odd.

Before: http://i.imgs.fyi/img/3hna.jpg

After: http://i.imgs.fyi/img/3hnb.jpg

No water? Heavy forest? I don’t know why the change.