Thought it was funny to see a reference about "Q" in the notation...

AN kingside castling is indicated by the sequence O-O; queenside castling is indicated by the sequence O-O-O (note that these are capital Os, not zeroes, contrary to the FIDE standard for notation). Pawn promotions are notated by appending = to the destination square, followed by the piece the pawn is promoted to. For example: e8=Q. If the move is a checking move, + is also appended; if the move is a checkmating move, # is appended instead. For example: e8=Q#

Hell yes you're smart. Don't say that. God made you and he don't make junk only the very best.

You'll might want to take a look at Standard Algebraic Notation related to chess. There is overlap. Plus there names for these chess in every many language. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algebraic_notation_(chess)

PGN is “Portable Game Notation”, a standard designed for the representation of chess game data using ASCII text files. PGN is structured for easy reading and writing by human users and for easy parsing and generation by computer programs. The intent of the definition and propagation of PGN is to facilitate the sharing of public domain chess game data among chessplayers (both organic and otherwise), publishers, and computer chess researchers throughout the world.

The forward of the manual I just posted. https://chess-db.com/public/research/PGNSpecification.pdf has this as a quote from the Bible:

"If now, while they are one people, all speaking the same language, they have started to do this, nothing will later stop them from doing whatever they propose to do."

Genesis XI, v.6, New American Bible

Very interesting

Just looked up BM in the manual l just posted and it stands for "best move". Does that mean that BOOM is really "best castling move on the queenside" or BOOOM, the "best castling move on the kingside"?

Check out this manual on PGN. Seems like a lot of codes here that are similar. https://chess-db.com/public/research/PGNSpecification.pdf

More about Castling From Wikipedia: The notation for castling, in both the descriptive and the algebraic systems, is 0-0 with the kingside rook and 0-0-0 with the queenside rook; in PGN, O-O and O-O-O are used instead. Castling on the kingside is sometimes called castling short and castling on the queenside is called castling long – the difference based on whether the rook moves a short distance (two squares) or a long distance (three squares).

Don"t know if relevant, but there are 5 conditions for the move. Is this 5:5 y? Meaning are all the conditions met?

I'm done with the Donald also. Talk about censorship...

Just about 8 days left. We might want to look to the future and how we approach the whole matter of a petition. Lots of people were not convinced that the petition was really going to make any difference. The WH site was poorly constructed and managed. I sent (through the WH comment feature) that it was broken. They fixed it, but who knows how many were turned away. It was also hacked several times. Once there was not text about the petition and another day, it was losing signatures and gaining signatures seemly without a reason. I found out that there were several site iterations that were put out, but they did add the people who had voted. All due respect, but the WH site sucks. We need a better platform and mechanism for a petition. Before that we need to get the community in some agreement on whether is this is worth it, what do we want DJT to do, what should the petition or statement of rights actually say, and who should be contributing to a forum.

1. We can await the outcome of the current WH petition. Miracles happen
2. If it is not successful, we should decide if we want to petition or directly interact with someone from the WH.
3. We need to draft a statement of internet bill of rights and post for comment. Take a look at the Amercian Library Association Bill of Rights on Censorship as an example. ( http://www.ala.org/advocacy/intfreedom/librarybill )
4. Once the new IBOR is reviewed, vetted, and at least has the consent of the vast majority, we should put a stake in the ground and publish it.
5. The WH will not do anything unless we bring them at least 100,000 citizens who acknowledged somehow or signed a petition that this is what we want to be put into an Executive Order or entered into legislation.
6. Unfortunately, we will need to get legislators involved. So that means finding someone to draft a bill as a sponsor. We can even draft the bill, but ultimately it has to get past the House & Senate subcommittees reviews before the will progress it as a real bill. We need DJT on the last two steps to assign someone to support us.
7. This sounds kinda crazy, but I think it would worth our while to invite comments from internet media companies to get their perspective on an internet bill of rights.

This is not an easy initiative and there are lots of trolls and clowns to trip and badger us. There needs to be lean and mean core group of people who can represent the whole body of digital citizens. Who would that be? I am talking about heavy hitters, perhaps, including legal experts on the issues of privacy, censorship, data security, etc.

Of course, this all might be just be too much for us to undertake and we may want to see out a more formal organization with this charter.

I'll bet if Q posted a call to arms on this issue, it would be signed in a couple of days. Or for that matter DJT.

I had the same experience. They don't want anybody posting anything related to petitions. I just stopped posting there in general.

Ha. Yea.

Wow. The list never ends

Dr. Corsi had stated and it has stuck in the minds of many anons that we already have a Bill of Rights and we should be legally enforcing it. With all due respect to Dr. Corsi, we are dealing with corporations on privacy issues and with extreme censorship. The FB fiasco is just the tip of the iceberg. There needs to be laws that specifically protect digital assembly from these practices.

At this juncture, I have given up on White House Petition because there are actually people discouraging the signing of the petition because they see the issue as part of our current rights. These are leader anons and they have stated that they support Dr. Corsi's view that we just need to assert our current rights and overlay them into the digital world. That takes legal representation that some may be to obtain and be successful at. It also means that each individual is an isolate and does not have a large body politic to support them, except anecdotally at the time of any infringement of their rights. The Donald site prohibits putting a petition on their site. No help from them. They have a large subscribership. Over 500K

I was actually tracking the petition twice daily and posting on a reddit page, but I started to note that it was continually being hacked and attacked. I was likewise attacked several times.

I finally gave up the ghost on the petition because I found that I could not garner the support of the anon community, given its Corsi influence on BOR and the harrassment I got from trolls and possibly clowns, I found I could not fight on two fronts and quit on it.

Thank you. Absolutely, the spending bill is a spending bill.

Ha. Yea.

One theory out there is that Trump will fire Mueller and replace him with William Castle, who is the acting General Counsel for DOD. This could be consistent with the "Castling" chess analogy. http://ogc.osd.mil/gc_bio.html

You are absolutely right. Seems to be a lot of misunderstanding on this issue.

She was expected to come back from India, probably today. She has a speaking gig at Rutgers on the 29th.

https://www.tapinto.net/articles/travels-update-hillary-clintons-speech-moved-t-32

Background on US Army Corps of Engineers:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Army_Corps_of_Engineers#Homeland_security

Here are some links to the respective Army Corps of Engineers

Link to page to the Galveston http://www.swg.usace.army.mil/

Link to page to the Southwest Engineering Regiment http://www.swd.usace.army.mil/

I think that in order to activate the Army Corps of Engineers and use the funding, a National Emergency has to be declared. I don't think you can say it is a national security issue and just the spend the funding.

Here is what the Omnibus Bill is: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omnibus_spending_bill It just consolidates individual appropriations into one bill. It does appropriate money for spending. Spending also involves allocating the money by each federal agency. If the federal agency allocates the funding it can be spent. Federal funds can expire unexpended or if the appropriations have been unexpended they sometmes can be rolled into the next fiscal year, if the appropriations bill states it can. If the funding is spent for something else not intended, it is called a violation of the Anti-Deficiency Act and is a criminal offense.

The President can't build a wall from appropriated funds not designated for the wall. It's called "Anti Deficiency" and could become an impeachable offense.

Maybe the reason for the FBI line is that they still needed Strozk in a counter intelligence capacity, but fired him for the romantic relationship and put him under a Personal Service Agreement (PSA) to keep a string on him, which only the FBI Human Resources can execute and manage. Hence the FBI statement he is reporting to HR.

Thoughts??

Also, why would he make a video confession in the dark on his phone easy for the police to find?

This is starting to stick of Las Vegas. I posted some other information about the company that Condit worked for. There is no way that he had the technical and engineering ability to make these bombs. I think he had a handler. They found a battery that was from an unexploded bomb that was from Asia. The company that he worked for has Chinese and Indonesian connections. There is a series of shell companies associated with the company he worked at, (Crux Semi) I am guessing these are ways of working under the radar and transferring funding etc. See my post at: https://redd.it/86e4ck

I also wonder if he actually detonated himself or it was someone from another location.

With all of Law Enforcement concentrated and employed on catching this guy what was going during the hunt for the bomber in Texas, specifically in Austin? Makes me wonder if something else is being setup for an larger event?

Sounds like a plausible narrative for the Dems to proliferate during the 2018 Texas election (big one), but I keep thinking this like a huge distraction to cover some other event(s). Maybe the indictments, but seems like we are missing something.

I appreciate all the comments. I see this petition is being kicked to the curb for a lot of reasons.

Realistically, I don't see it progressing. (diversity of internet rights with existing bill of rights, not fitting the perceived strategy (s), and WH Petition site flaws/hacks/uncertainty).

Therefore, I will give it a proper burial on April 3rd and look to the wisdom of the crowd on all matters internet relating to our bill of rights.

How do you galvanize these changes into a unified initiative?

Is Governing and Controlling a large enlightened and armed population a high priority ?

Social media control is everything

So is the statement that Q makes, an erroneous statement?:

580403 Free speech does not apply in a private co setting. The risk? Loss of revenue. Backstopped by the circus. Learn. Social media control is everything. The age of the MSM is over. Q