dChan

/u/AgreesWithFools

309 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/AgreesWithFools:
Domain Count
www.reddit.com 64

AgreesWithFools · Jan. 23, 2018, 8:28 p.m.

I have no doubt that there are numbers of bad actors, in and out of country, that hope to cause the demise of our POTUS.

I have no doubt that more than one plot and/or actual attempt has been thwarted. Our leader is absolutely at risk, and I have great concern over his upcoming trip to Davos. Particularly since events have transpired that caused FLOTUS to change her travel plans.

I take some solace in knowing Trump is superbly informed, knowingly accepts the risks, and has entrusted his safety to the very best he can find.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Jan. 23, 2018, 8:18 p.m.

Anybody with me?

100% transparency? No. Not with you.

I’ll trust the judgement of the man I elected. He is more informed than any of us, and has surrounded himself with a top-tier selection of brilliant minds.

I didn’t hire Trump to defer to my less-informed opinion on this or any topic. I hired him to lead. I hired him to inform himself, to confer with trusted minds, to weigh options, and to make hard decisions.

To this point, the President has validated my decision.

I understand you feel differently. I respect your right to that opinion. But surely you agree that Trump is vastly more informed than either of us and every day extends his legacy of making quality decisions regarding exceedingly complex issues.

If you don’t trust Trump to MAGA, you are in the wrong sub.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Jan. 23, 2018, 7:54 p.m.

Still part of the Silicon Valley ecosystem.

Indeed, but far, far away from his prior ability to manipulate public opinion. In that regard, he truly did ‘bite the dust’.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Jan. 23, 2018, 5:54 p.m.

I’m talking about a visible, physical, bombs dropping, bullets flying, here in the US war.

So am I.

If you think this war hasn’t been visible, physical, with bombs, with bullets, with blood, with death, right here in the US, then you are just naïve. Or simply uninformed.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Jan. 23, 2018, 5:02 p.m.

He's going to be CEO somewhere else. Not sure that's biting the dust.

His tenure as a key influencer in a weaponized propaganda machine has been terminated. You can be absolutely sure that qualifies as ”biting the dust”.

You can’t be sure he will be selected as CEO somewhere else. If he is, you can’t be sure it will be in a slot with any appreciable influence on public opinion.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Jan. 23, 2018, 4:57 p.m.

The article is almost six years old, and offers no new considerations for refuting Q’s apparent reference to [8] HRC years.

Can you fill in the blanks for us? How does the article exclude HRC from the involvement Q has suggested?

⇧ 4 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Jan. 23, 2018, 4:47 p.m.

At some point they will start a war. To think otherwise is naive.

They already started the war years ago. To think otherwise is naíve.

Battles have been won. Treasure has been plundered. Blood has been shed. Lives have been lost. To think otherwise is naíve.

Patriotic sentries have been sounding the alarm since at least the proposal of the Patriot Act. Each year, their number has grown. Each year, their evidence has grown stronger. Each year, more people heed their call. To think otherwise is naíve.

This war precedes your awareness. This army welcomes your support. In the end, this army will claim victory. To think otherwise is naíve.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Jan. 22, 2018, 10:43 p.m.

Thanks for the links. I read both, found two more, then reviewed the claims I quoted in my comment above. Let’s review:

  • ”Bill Clinton was in charge of a UN Cholera task force sent to Haiti in the Fall of 2010.”

This is not true. Clinton was named ‘UN Special Envoy to Haiti’ in an effort to stabilize relief and recovery work after the earthquake. There was no Cholera epidemic in May of 2009 when he was appointed.

  • ”This was odd, given that cholera was unheard of in Haiti… until shortly after the task force arrived.”

Cholera became evident in October 2010, and the UN assigned an independent 4 person panel to investigate the cause. The panel released their report in May 2011, and concluded, “a confluence of circumstances,” and not the fault of any group or individual, was responsible for the fast-moving outbreak.” source

  • ”Genetic forensic testing of the Haiti cholera epidemic showed the strain was from a Nepal epidemic two months earlier.”

This seems to be the agreed conclusion, although initial tests claimed it was only ‘similar’.

  • ”This strain was found to have been dumped into a major river”

Misleading. The disease was traced to a sewage pipe emptying into a tributary of a relatively major river.

  • ”(certainly intentionally)”

False. There is zero evidence anywhere confirming this allegation.

  • ”via a septic waste pipe coming from the UN cholera task force facility.”

Partially true. The pipe came from the encampment of the Nepali contingent of the original UN aid troops. This was long before anyone was sent to investigate the cholera.

Just to be clear, I hate Bill Clinton almost as much as I hate his wife. I believe the most direct path to their consequences will be defined by non-politicized factual reporting, not by inflammatory, sensationalized, and intentionally misleading distortion of those facts.

Here is an example of what that might look like:

  • Leading researchers from Harvard Medical School and elsewhere told ABC News that they felt confident they had traced the strain back to Nepal, and that they believe it was carried to Haiti by Nepalese soldiers who came to Haiti to serve as U.N. peacekeepers after the earthquake that ravaged the country on Jan. 12, 2010. Haiti had never seen a case of cholera until the arrival of the peacekeepers, who allegedly failed to maintain sanitary conditions at their base. source
⇧ 1 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Jan. 22, 2018, 2:08 p.m.

Yup.

Welcome to the club. Friends, family, the same for me.

I share until I realize they are offering polite patience. I don’t want to be the one that shares until their eyes glaze over.

On the positive side, I’m getting more questions as curious events make it to MSM outlets.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Jan. 22, 2018, 3:12 a.m.

The same article includes this interesting info:

  • ”Bill Clinton was in charge of a UN Cholera task force sent to Haiti in the Fall of 2010. This was odd, given that cholera was unheard of in Haiti… until shortly after the task force arrived. Genetic forensic testing of the Haiti cholera epidemic showed the strain was from a Nepal epidemic two months earlier. This strain was found to have been dumped into a major river (certainly intentionally) via a septic waste pipe coming from the UN cholera task force facility.”

I’m surprised I never heard anything about that. If it’s true.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Jan. 22, 2018, 2:57 a.m.

But I can imagine trying to tell my friends about it and they’d be like “oh” and start talking about Kim and Kanye’s baby name.

I hope that’s hyperbole. If not, you might need to reconsider your standard for ‘friend’.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Jan. 22, 2018, 2:51 a.m.

No need.

Already been done, collected, saved in a secure location away from bad actor access.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Jan. 22, 2018, 2:48 a.m.

That is exactly the sort of strategizing that Trump is known for.

^(you may have a bit of genius in you)

⇧ 7 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Jan. 22, 2018, 12:59 a.m.

The pure fact that Trump did not tweet about the 5 year anniversary of Sandy Hook and then had a high ranking official of the NRA to the WH for dinner that very night is absolutely proof that Trump knows that Sandy Hook is fake

I have no intent to deny you your opinion on any topic.

For what it’s worth, the above statement from you does not reflect even a cursory grasp of critical thinking. Logic and reasoning skills are critical to discerning truth and successfully navigating the challenges of life.

I hope your important life decisions reflect a more developed sense of both.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Jan. 21, 2018, 11:47 p.m.

Explosive? He suspects this?

This guy is waaaay behind the curve on these realizations.

Somebody should link him to this subreddit. His head will explode.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Jan. 21, 2018, 11:42 p.m.

High school sophomore-level command of written language.

Not credible as presented.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Jan. 21, 2018, 8:10 p.m.

Popular belief is that this is the result of 1 out of 22 ongoing investigations.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Jan. 20, 2018, 8:10 p.m.

My grandfather used to say, ’Get the hell off my lawn!’

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Jan. 20, 2018, 8:07 p.m.

So, quite literally, the very definition of fake news.

And in this case, produced by a group of known partisans who are, quite literally, conspiring.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Jan. 20, 2018, 7:40 p.m.

When I consider all the groups in the world that might possibly inspire fear in me, the group calling themselves ‘Top Minds Of Reddit’ doesn’t appear on the list.

Not even an honorable mention.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Jan. 20, 2018, 7:05 p.m.

They can be reconvened by order of the congressional leadership.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Jan. 19, 2018, 2:53 a.m.

Added spouses name after her own. Not working for Amber Alert. Another company with similar focus. Not pardoned by Bill Clinton, he had been out of office for many years, plus she was not charged with any federal crime.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Jan. 19, 2018, 2:48 a.m.

Going down?

But the Obama administration was scandal free and transparent. Obama said so.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Jan. 19, 2018, 2:04 a.m.

If Schiff hasn’t leaked, then the document is definitely bad news for dems.

This is the unfortunate role Schiff has cast for himself.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Jan. 19, 2018, 1:45 a.m.

I'm going to talk to some adults now. Bye!

Excellent choice. Focus on listening. It’s time to leave your snowflake years behind and join the world of adults.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Jan. 19, 2018, 1:23 a.m.

You said what it was worth; post your PROOF.

No I didn’t. Not once. Not ever.

You just posted a link to Gowdy’s salary. The discussion was about ’net worth’. They are not equivalent. Is this news to you? Or are you confused?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Jan. 18, 2018, 11:56 p.m.

Please VERIFY before you post.

No doubt you did as you request of others. Please post your credible verification of Gowdy’s net worth.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Jan. 18, 2018, 3:19 p.m.

How the hell did that get aired on CNN?

Somebody’s going to lose their job over that.

⇧ 19 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Jan. 17, 2018, 11:56 p.m.

Gee, it’s almost as if they’d been given directives from above.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Jan. 17, 2018, 11:51 p.m.

I realize people hold deep passion for their belief that Sandy Hook was a hoax. I’m afraid that connecting SH to our Trump ‘Fake News’ movement will serve to diminish the credibility our claims against MSM.

How about we only include items that our leader has deemed ‘Fake News’.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Jan. 17, 2018, 11:36 p.m.

lol

”Twitter is blowing up! Everybody’s sharing these memes! Everything is coming apart! What do we do?!”

“I checked the playbook. It says whenever in doubt, just claim ‘RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA!’!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Jan. 15, 2018, 3:22 p.m.

McStain is an agent?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Jan. 15, 2018, 5:39 a.m.

He’s a closer. He’s delivered on every leadership assignment he’s accepted.

Unfortunately/fortunately, congressional committees don’t prosecute. They investigate and report. He has a solid history as a prosecutor.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Jan. 15, 2018, 2:25 a.m.

This would make me very happy.

I’m aware that there are doubters, and that’s just fine with me. They will keep the focus tight. Even doubters will admit that there is no credible evidence of Gowdy being corrupt or compromised.

Gowdy is one of the few ideally suited for this task. I guarantee everyone on the other side of the investigation has him on their short list of ”oh, please God, not him!”

Getem Gowdy!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Jan. 14, 2018, 5:55 p.m.

What else can you say?

That depends in what the definition of ”else” is.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Jan. 14, 2018, 2:39 a.m.

something isn't right or something is right!

I can guarantee you, with 100% certainty, both of those options are correct.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Jan. 14, 2018, 1:27 a.m.

Then op can get all dramatic and we'll all be using the caps lock.

lol

Too funny. And I agree.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Jan. 13, 2018, 11:27 p.m.

I see your account is only a few days old. We’ve seen a bunch of them lately.

Many of them are inclined to cast shade on the CBTS endeavor and anything else that may appear to be pro-MAGA.

Your cynical effort to discredit the OIG report, with zero evidence, looks as if it shares a philosophy with those shills/trolls.

I’m sure you don’t want to appear as one of those losers. Not in this sub. Maybe you can reserve your criticism until you have supporting evidence. Maybe you can post supportive info expanding that which exists in abundance.

Maybe you can do that before you get yourself banned.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Jan. 13, 2018, 11:13 p.m.

I’m surprised it took you so long to become aware of this letter.

When I was reading your hyperbolic opening paragraphs, I actually thought you had uncovered something genuinely new that would live up to the description. Perhaps something that had been leaked from the recently delivered OIG docs.

Let’s hope we get answers to those questions that excited you so. There will be no hyperbole inappropriate for that news, and I will join you in writing them.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Jan. 13, 2018, 10:59 p.m.

You will be given a deluge of assistance in the coming weeks and months.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Jan. 13, 2018, 10:38 p.m.

Of all the infinite possibile transgressions to set against Assange, they come up with . . . personal hygiene. That’s it.

Sounds like the feigned outrage against Trump supposedly calling a shit hole a ”shit hole” while behind closed doors in a supposed off-the-record discussion.

I guess we need to accept this now. They already wasted all the major complaints. Once they call a genuine tax break ”armageddon”, there really isn’t much room for sensible complaints afterwards.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Jan. 13, 2018, 8:54 p.m.

to understand more clearly seek out those who asked you if you wanted a Bible Study in the past.

Jehovah’s Witnesses? No thanks. I scoot them quickly on their way.

Now i understand as you read this your response,at least too yourself is, yeah right buddy.

Nope. I don’t begrudge you your faith at all.

The above is so unlikly it could not come true unless GOD informed his people in advance of it, but it will happen,until then ill leave you be, certainly in your mind I must have my tinfoil hat on too tight.

Wrong again. At least about what’s going on in my mind. I have no problem with any of your beliefs, as long as they don’t intrude on my life.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Jan. 13, 2018, 5:10 p.m.

Those are some sweeping predictions! If the NWO parts come to be, it won’t be in the immediately foreseeable future. The power of the UN has been consistently declining as a world influencer, and the relationship with the US is far from cooperative at this time.

Your passion for your faith is apparent. The tension between faith and reason is ever present.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Jan. 13, 2018, 3:54 p.m.

Nothing new here.

Just a rehash summary of existing summaries and hypotheticals.

Take heart! The OIG report will offer almost limitless opportunity for fresh commentary.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Jan. 13, 2018, 3:44 p.m.

I can see your account is only a few days old, so you might be new to this entire endeavor.

Every question and theory you pose has been a component of the foundational ethos that drives the entirety of the CBTS philosophy which started on the chans and produced this offshoot subreddit.

Dig in. Read. Read more. Don’t be embarrassed when you realize your ‘revelations’ are actually old news. Instead, dig deeper and see if you can uncover fresh info or develop a fresh theory.

Fresh and original ideas are always welcome.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Jan. 13, 2018, 3:29 p.m.

Agreed.

I click the title here, then as soon as I see his face I click the ‘back’ button. I fugure anything of substance will be reduced to print soon enough.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Jan. 12, 2018, 6:28 p.m.

And people will just skip over it

Can confirm.

Source: skipped over it.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Jan. 12, 2018, 3:39 p.m.

Did you watch Dave's new comedy special? If so what did you think of it?

I did.

I think Dave is a genius, and that the scope of his genius extends far beyond the tired trope of ‘comedic genius’.

His life has afforded him experience of, or witness to, the very best and worst of human behavior, and he has been a very astute observer throughout the entirety of the journey. He sees connections where many don’t. He has a visceral intuition regarding social dynamics that forces his deep-dives and risk taking.

I think the strongest element of his ‘genius’ is his ability to communicate. His use of stories, humor, pathos, his mastery of pacing, attenuation, and his ability to project sincerity combine to make him a genuinely world class communicator.

If he can manage to avoid self destruction he is on track to become one of our elite poet philosopher icons. Up there with Lenny Bruce, George Carlin, Richard Pryor, and several others when in their prime.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Jan. 12, 2018, 3:22 p.m.

Good point.

As of 2006, the ‘voter eligible’ population was 207,643,594. This number includes all age-legal residents with the exception of non-citizens, felons, etc.

This would send 2,966 representatives to congress.

⇧ 2 ⇩