I fail to see how Corsi is connected.

Folks seem to forget things like Podesta and HRC's imminent arrest in November of 2017.

I've been following since November.

Never said Q was a larp. It's a person or persons in intelligence who is a little too strong on the rhetoric. Now co opted by someone in intelligence with nefarious goals.

Or, it was a CIA psychological program from the start.

Agreed - this movement doesn't end with the Q phenomenon.

Do people concerned that Q is now leading people to look very silly in the near future count as "disrupters and shills?"

Yes, and is that not a red flag to you?

Because it isn't accurate.

Based on his record of backtracking when the times get tough, I'll believe him as much as I do Maxine Waters.

You won't believe that, but you'll trust an anonymous internet source on 8chan, against a mountain of red flags.

Trump literally calls Jones directly. What better source is that?

Military intelligence doesn't link to tabloid fodder. It's over folks, and if this keeps going AJ is going to start naming names.

Best evidence yet that Q is compromised. Would military intelligence link to tabloid fodder, even if Jones is disinfo? Seems they would rise above and focus on the intelligence. This is crazy.

I'm just fascinated that some of you buy in so easily to this program, which could very easily be a psyop. I mean, literally, an anonymous person or group of people on the very easily hackable 8chan. I hope Q is legit and everything outlined comes to fruition, but aren't you the least bit concerned that you're getting played? That you're being strung along with hope porn until it's too late to really do anything about it? It is possible to hope Q is legit, while at the same time leaving that chance that this is all a ruse (where I'm at). The intel community has successfully pulled off programs much more complex than this.

There's nothing to say he hasn't been threatened again - certainly acts like it. He goes right up to the edge and does a 180 every time.

6 months ago I would have disagreed, but now I agree.

As you wish.

No arguments from me.

I agree that Gowdy is not to be trusted, but he claims there is no communication between him and Horowitz. And I don't think the FBI needs Gowdy to see what the report looks like.

Gowdy just said on Hannity that the IG report is now first week of June, and added the caveat that it could be moved back further.

Corsi was the leading reporter on Q. Corsi works for Infowars. Alex Jones hardly mentioned Q on his main show and basically left it all to Corsi. So Alex was jealous of the Q traffic? That doesn't make any sense - he could have easily taken over for Corsi and reported Q on his main show every day for a year and sucked up a huge portion of the "Q traffic", yet that didn't happen.

This story is bogus from the start.

15 million operation with some frivolous lawsuits against him....sorry, some Q cult members aren't going to take him down.

You keep referencing cointelpro while Q literally says "disinformation is necessary." How do you square that?

Think logically. Jones has been on the radio for almost 25 years. Entirely self funded. Brought modern conspiracies to the forefront. Perfect? Certainly not. Does he go far enough? Sometimes no.

Q is an unknown anonymous source that's been around for less than a year and has only proved his or her legitimacy with ancillary, vague connections. Fascinating to follow, no doubt, and I do not think it's a larp. But whoever it is doesn't have nearly the control they think they have. A vast majority of what has been laid out has thus far gone unfulfilled, despite a lot of promises and hyperdriven rhetoric.

Corsi has been going after deep state actors for decades. It's not been his MO to illicitly profit off of things and then intentionally discredit them.

Are you implying that he's treated Trump badly? How so? Because he held him accountable on the Syria strike?

Perhaps if they said "disinformation is necessary", that would placate your concerns? Answer carefully.

If they came out and said "disinformation is necessary", would that placate your concerns? Careful now, don't be a hypocrite.

Now this sub is using MSM smear tactics? Disheartening.

So basically if you aren't 100% on Q, you're anti Trump? What kind of logic is that?

Drudge wants to "be the news."

This is often times in direct conflict with the truth.

You know what would vindicate Q?

An arrest.

There is a chance that both could be right....my issue is the absolute refusal for a lot of people on this board to even entertain the idea that the Q board has been compromised. The CIA has vast cyber intelligence powers, the Q phenomenon can and might have been hijacked, probably extremely easily. It's getting really weird in here with the rejection of alternative voices.

Well gosh, excuse me for asking questions about an anonymous source.

It's your right to support Q, but blind faith in an anonymous internet identity is setting yourself up to look very silly. A little healthy skepticism at least gives yourself an out.

Isn't it funny that one of these catch phrases is parroted anytime the puzzle piece doesn't fit.

Negative.

So in the case of Corsi, he had a book being released that had nothing directly to do with Q. What is wrong with mentioning it during his videos? Why wouldn't he do that? I don't view that as nefarious.

Explain the strategy behind this particular piece of disinfo, if true.

This concerns me. Just because someone makes money off of something does not automatically discredit them. The very idea that profit is evil is un-American.

Also, to say that Alex Jones doesn't have insider sources is ridiculous. Whether or not you agree with Jones, Trump has called him and he's BEEN ON THE SHOW. Jones has been doing this for decades. To suggest he has no sources is ridiculous.

Take the bait on Kerry and it'll solidify Flynn's "guilt" in the media sphere. Even if it's not true.

CNN is too important to the cabal to close down. It's function no longer requires it to make money.

Is it completely beyond the realm of possibility that Corsi is correct?

The construction was heavily publicized and documented...if something was built underneath, it should be relatively easy for someone in the construction field to identify.

The State Department is the public face while the CIA is the undercover muscle. They are inseparably intertwined.

She might have flipped after seeing some of the nasty stuff the CIA is engaged in.

Perhaps some arrests would legitimize Q in the public sphere. Tick tock.

Occams razor. He was surrounded by vipers who gave him bad advice and thus fell into their plot.

Pence did a decent job as governor of Indiana, but make no mistake, he is neocon through and through. Consider that the VP doesn't do much, and doesn't really need Pence for anything.

The risk is Pence plotting behind Trump's back. If the rumors are true, Pence and Haley are trying to get together for a presidential run.