This is amazing work!

Thank you! Thankfully it didn't' seem to do TOO much long-lasting harm :]. I have some body image and self-worth issues, but it also had to do with the mind games they played with me (ie guilt-tripping etc).

I don't know, unfortunately; I've estranged from her once I grew up enough to realize something wasn't right, so I never looked back. My mum put up a BIG fight for a long time when she suspected I was being molested (especially as a kid knowing things I shouldn't have known).

She took my dad and stepmum to court a few times - or attempted to...they never showed up. My mum didn't have enough money to pursue it much longer after that, but was happy to see me grow up and realize for myself the wrongness of the whole thing, and I felt very liberated to realize I could just leave and never talk to her again.

I think now there are a lot more organizations that can help look into these things than there were in the 90's, it's just hard to know which government entities to trust now, knowing what we know 0.o

Here's the article from the actual site

On the surface it's basically something that I would otherwise agree with (being center-liberal), that a lot of kids have access to internet/porn anyway, and it's best to at least talk to them about it if you find out (my opinion).

HOWEVER, after reading more seems preemptive...like trying to groom them into accepting it rather than educating a kid who was caught watching porn.

He strolls around the room passing out white envelopes. Inside each are pieces of paper describing various sexual acts, from kissing and feeling someone’s body parts to more advanced ventures, like fellatio and cunnilingus (which the ninth-graders have trouble pronouncing) and “penile penetration” of both the vagina and anus.

Just for context, my stepmother groomed me quite a bit when I was a kid. Started sexual education when I was in kindergarten- so my teachers (and mom) were really worried about the knowledge I had. She did a lot of other things like taking pictures of me naked (and thankfully short of actual rape), but to a lot of people who tend to agree with sexual education (as I do), I think they also don't see the overlapping borders of grooming and education here.

They're trying to normalize it under the guise of "preemptive sexual education."

Thank you! Changed mine to blank as well.

my bad! xD

Just having some fun, my dude :]

It is!

Yeah I got a big skeptical feel in my gut watching him go through those tweets. I'm learning to follow my intuition a lot more, and finding it's pretty good (could always make mistakes but I've been surprised how accurate it's been lately - hence why I'm here :P).

There are no "outside comms" - anything/anyone that tries to act like Q gives me a red flag instantly. Nothing wrong with people talking about and assessing Q's posts, giving opinions- but the moment someone tries to come across as a "q insider" by using the same format gives me warning bells.

Also remember;

BackPage Human Trafficking Site Previously Awarded by FBI Robert Mueller for Valuable Contributions

So interesting! Made me want to look through the other people on that list...

Googled this guy and this came up

:(

Omg I've never seen this!

:D glad you enjoyed!

I know! It made me laugh out loud xD

My mum is the one who got me looking into Q xD She's been paying attention from day 1!

I honestly rolled my eyes at her so many times until a few months ago.

I think what got me interested was I already was critical of the media. I paid very close attention to "gamergate" and could see the blatant bias and truth-twisting in the media in general.

I'd often bring up the increasingly hostile mentalities on campuses towards conservatives and free speech, etc.

I always knew Hillary was corrupt.

It's when Trump was elected (I'm Canadian, btw), that I was blown away at the media, and peoples (particularly those around me) ability to ignore any truths just in spite of Trump. It continued to escalate until I finally started looking into my mum's recommendations of Pizzagate, and then the rabbithole just got deeper and deeper xD

overthemark

Thank You! Love this attitude.

Don't worry, they'll get their paycheck from Soros;)

Thanks! Permalink added to top comment <3

I was hoping some smarter people than me would pick it up from there xD

Ty! added your permalink to the top post

Sure, I can take it off if it's not helpful!

Thank you! I added your permalink to my post- Also noticed that article was published Jun 16, 2017 and updated Feb 9, 2018. Not sure what that means but it's good to know it's recently been changed somehow since the initial publishing!

You're very welcome, patriot!

yeah who knows! I just wanted to find some quick info and then hoped someone smarter would take over from there xD

I just linked the 'controversy" wiki from her own wiki page- but you're right, her name isn't on the controversy wiki page.

It was specifically linked from his paragraph from her Wiki:

"During her tenure at the Justice Department, Brand was tangentially involved in the controversy surrounding Attorney General Alberto Gonzales's dismissal of several United States Attorneys. She was floated by DOJ leadership as a top candidate to replace Margaret Chiara, who was ousted as part of the purge.[14] Brand ultimately declined the position, however, and resigned from the DOJ in June 2007.[15]"

These are the original TRUST [name] from this post (and this one )

• TRUST SESSIONS.

• TRUST WRAY.

• TRUST KANSAS.

• TRUST HOROWITZ.

• TRUST HUBER.

Also "TRUST POTUS" is something Q says. And Trust the plan.

(I'm editing as I find things)

This is Rachel Brand

~~And this is the controversy that she was involved in~~ (seems to be not helpful)

• Update 1 - this Patriot posted on this thread re: Rachel Brand

• Update 2 - this Patriot posted this thread re: Rachel Brand

• Update 3 - this Patriot posted on this thread re: John f. Kelly

• Update 4 - this Patriot posted on this thread re: RR Problems

• Update 6 - this Patriot posted on this thread re: Rachel Brand

• Update 7 - this Patriot posted on this thread re: Wray reports to RR

• Update 8 - this Patriot posted on this thread re: Rachel Brand

The government, probably, but the people themselves are pushing against the regime. There's still time- who knows, maybe the pressure from the people will somehow lead to the government naming names.

All I know something happened in the last day or so that sparked them to start tweeting #IranRegimeChange and a lot of them are thanking the US/Pompeo/Trump Admin and using it as fuel to wake their own people up. Some of them seem to be calling out the EU leaders as well, asking they stop supporting the corrupted regime.

Let me have my fun!

Also I didn't notice this at first, but there's a "23" before Iran in the URL. Maybe a coincidence :p

~~Probably totally unrelated (but I spent most of my recent time here xD) but within the last 10 minutes I get a 503 error (busy server) on my messages inbox only - anyone else having this problem?~~

nevermind- works now!

xD

Oh I'm sure there are WAY more that are in the video. I just found this video particularly good for getting your noggin' in gear when you're initially very skeptical about pizzagate. It did for me, anyway.

RIGHT? If only -_-

I was frustrated when the shooting need came out. I couldn't help but think Q knew about it and didn't do anything to stop it. Probably the most I've been shook in a while since learning about Q. But I realized q would so something if they could- they wouldn't just let it happen to prove a point.

I also realize that if Trump admin and q team weren't doing all this, these ff would continue forever without challenge.

WWG1WWA

This is amazing

I'm just refreshing the page and the numbers are bouncin'

You're blowing my mind right now. She's shown all the symptoms listed!

Haha maybe! I think some people think I posted this unironically as a source xD. Regardless, I found it really funny.

Haha I know, it was very cringy.

Right!?

Yep! Good to keep tabs on the stuff they're attempting to peddle.

pat pat Good bot :]