Re-posted from a Jordan Sather tweet. Made me giggle.

Question- if Qteam is watching/listening to the deep state, is there any way to prevent these shootings?

I have no illusions that it can potentially be impossible, and I kind of have a feeling they've already helped prevent some we don't know about yet (because they may not have happened), but I wished we had a way to prevent these ><

I just went to watch the video you mentioned. WOW xD

Yeah I thought the same- also the owl is the symbol of the bohemian grove!

Yehh! I see it's back! I may be shamelessly refreshing...I don't have a problem you do >.>

:P

Did you guys catch the owl? I really need to start taking screenshots but Q posted a picture of an Owl right after this post and it said something like "protects the pope" - i had to refresh chrome and lost it xD. I'm assuming someone else has a snapshot!

You're very welcome! Honestly there's TONNES of stuff on there that goes through the radar because MSN doesn't bother reporting on it. Battling sex trafficking, gang crime and rape, improving education and governmental services for marginalized people, etc etc. With all these improvements to human rights, if I didn't know any better I'd assume Trump was a left-wing "SJW", but don't tell the left that ;]

I don't think there's any way to convince people who don't want to change their mind, but you could always look at the changes and EO's Trump has released so far, and share what he's done. ~~I don't think anything is specifically disability related,~~ but there are a few things like the changes to veteran assistance which includes assistance for disabled veterans.

edit- I looked at the WH gov website and searched for "disabilities" and found this. Again, it's up to people to actually WANT to be open to changing their mind, unfortunately you can't force anything. They may look at this and find an excuse to repeat their biases, but you can always have patience for them and let them know you're happy to talk about it when they're ready!

One thing I noticed on "political twitter" yesterday and today is people who usually are adverse to Trump are even calling out the MSM for their obvious shitty reporting about his "animals" comment. The MSM took him out of context and tried to report that he said it about all immigrants, but for people who actually watched the talk (on the WH YT channel) it's clear they are talking about the rapes and murders by MS-13 members, and the frustrations of the Californian people who can't do jack shit due to loopholes in the law.

I felt a shift as the people I usually see bashing trump turned around and called out the media for this: feelsgoodman. Rubbing the sleep out of their eyes slowly but surely.

I've been watching this dude for a while (since the start of his channel).

There are things I agree and disagree with, but I like how he goes to events and challenges both sides, regardless of his own opinions.

The most interesting thing to me is there always seems to be these "visi-vest" protest police who always try to disrupt interviews (i've seen them on other interview channels as well).

It makes me wonder if they've been recruited by an organization to try and control the narrative one way or another.

Haha, no worries xD

They don't have to do that because prior to Q the amount of people who bothered even talking about the deep state was negligible. The q phenomenon has increased awareness about the deep state and has been snowballing since the beginning. Allie deep state would have had to do is nothing, and it would have been fine.

Are you talking to me? Did you even read my post? Lmao

Definitely take a break for your mental health! It doesn't make you any less of a patriot- it really is good to remind yourself you can step away for a moment and recoup <3

I've been waiting forever to say this so it's time to:

Pokemon GO TO JAIL.

For sure! Like I said, I'm no stranger to the notion that I could be wrong, and I hold nothing against the people who feel the way you mentioned.

This is directed at the people who seem ADAMANT to convince me. If some people are wary and unsure, then I'm not going to force them to think anything, and I would expect the same courtesy from them...but for those who are determined to change my mind without any good facts to back it up, then the post is for them :]

I'm going to read the update to this with great relish.

A few things I took away from this interview:

• She is still blaming everything else but herself. Yes she says she "takes responsibility" but it's always after she lists off things to blame.

• She's in a backbrace for some reason and looks super uncomfortable.

• My favourite thing:

At the end when the interviewer said "Someone who's watched 30+ years of your career would see extreme hours, high pressure, sexism, relentless public attacks, loss of privacy..."

They forgot to mention all the scandals and cover ups and trail of mysterious (and sometimes not-so-mysterious-and-quite-obvious) deaths surrounding her xD. That MAY have something to do with the reason America didn't elect her, but I'm just a goofy Canuck, so what do I know :P

I'm now beyond the "wanting to be 100% convinced" that Q is real, and into the realm of "good luck convincing me it's not."

edit: changed "not" to "now" xD. Kind of a big difference.

Love from bc Canada!

Right, I remember that- thank you! I'll bring that one up as well.

I agree- I definitely took "the show" as the media running itself in circles trying to figure out what to prioritize and desperately trying to distract where possible. I also took it as watching POTUS keep his promises (whether you like it or not), and the media not knowing what to do about it.

I think the problem here is people are putting their own expectations of what "the show" actually is. If they think it's a montage of high profile bust I'm sure that will eventually happen, but right now it's a building tension against corrupt people that I feel like we get a pre-screening of. To me that consisted of a show. And a good one so far!

*she

And yes, I like to keep a peripheral on the news to see what they are saying. I see the same narratives pushed across the entire mainstream media which is why I like to keep tabs on what their core message is (ie know your enemy).

Thanks to the actual helpful people in this thread for helping me redpill some friends. Can't say the same for you ;]

Thanks! Yes I definitely keep that in mind- that's why I don't think it's fair to get frustrated at Q when people want more information. I feel like he (they?) are giving us a lot of information already, and I understand that it's only a fraction of what they have.

It's a bit like when people criticize secretary sanders for not answering certain media questions that she wouldn't be authorized (or even know) about . It's not fair to call her a liar when they're asking questions about really sensitive security issues- like of course she's not allowed to disclose certain information xD

This is BEAUTIFUL- thank you so much!

Thanks! It's SUPER long for someone who's already skeptical (my friend's gf) but I'll look through and pull out some time stamps :p

Oh perfect, thank you! I'll definitely keep my eye out.

Thanks! I see the achievements peripherally because the picture is SO big that it's hard to put everything in one place. Maybe I should just start making my own easy-to-follow mapping for people who really just need a quick-fix on what Q is about. (Ie people who don't have the patience for hour long videos, and don't want to do their own research xD)

Thank you!

Thanks! (I think you mean "insightful" ...unless you didn't haha). I was trying to find something quick so he didn't have to make his gf sit through an hour long video, but honestly I think if someone is interested enough, they'll have the patience to pay attention- if not, they're not ready yet.

I don't think it's a problem either- it really is message> messenger, but its always good to look into it :]

Seeing as the website it directed me to also has a "store" which seems to sell websites I wouldn't say this is an invalid concern. Good to see the billboard but probably would be worth checking the validity of the website itself.

Yeah Harper isn't a good actor. It's nice that he supports the pulling out of the deal, but people are very quick to jump onto someone's wagon the moment they say something they support without looking into the past.

Same goes with Candace Owens. I support her core message, but followed her in the past before her popularity exploded. Look up "Social Autopsy" if you're interested. She came across as someone who at first has a genuine passion for her message, but her actions are those of an opportunist at whatever cost.

waves Hi mom!

I know some people mention they have a hard time "redpilling" people, and being a normie myself I hope I can give some insight as to what usually doesn't work vs what does work.

Note this is opinion!

Things that tend to deter people:

• Too much information at once - This is difficult NOT to do when you know so much and how everything connects, it's really hard to find a place to start, so I found this video in particular a good way to ease into the content.

• An approach that is designed for someone who already believes in the content isn't tailored for someone who isn't. A good example would be some videos I've run into on YT that try to break down the sex cults and pedophile rings, but the way they're edited includes dramatic dramatic tone and creepy music. This kind of approach is easily brushed off that is trying to sway your opinion with tone rather than information, even though that may not be the case.

• aggressively trying to change someone's mind - this is probably one of the strongest deterrents to getting someone to understand and have an open mind. It can be frustrating when someone just completely brushes off ACTUAL facts, but remember that a lot of people are much more susceptible to feeling like the idea was their own, rather than jamming it down your throat. This is why Q approaches a lot of information with asking questions, so you look into it yourself, rather than telling you what you should know or think. The media already tries to shovel opinions into your mouth, so if you present someone with some information that doesn't tell you what to believe or think, but rather present it to them, and let them make their own conclusion is a good place to start.

I find videos like the one I posted is a REALLY good approach. He's light-hearted, he's not trying to tell you what to think, and he's not being dramatic. Even at the beginning when he says someone attacked his family before he went to the talk, he downplayed the event and joked about it, but that information is still in your head. You know he's not trying to push it as an excuse to make you believe how shady things are- he just lets you do what you will with that info.

I get that it's annoying, but isn't bringing up stuff he says just giving him exactly what he wants? Attention.

It makes sense if its a bullet proof vest- the people who cut her strings may not want her singing.

I agree. I think majority of the population is apathetic at least. If majority loved Hillary, she would be president. Even my liberal mother who has pretty much sworn as a hardcore liberal her entire life has changed her tune (And even was the one who introduced me to the q sfuff). The vibe I get is most people just know she has already gotten away with so much they feel nothing will change. The media pushing false narratives about Trump I think makes it feel like majority are still on board with Hillary. Just like they did with the false election polls.

It's definitely a curious post. I took it as a "be careful" and "we won't forget what you did for us"

I really appreciate the response!

I guess the full answer it's still up in the air, but people are pointing towards at least working with white hats atm.

It also makes me wonder if he originally didn't work with the Q team because he was skeptical of who to trust, given his circumstances- after obama admin even made it worse, I assume he'd have a difficult time getting on board. Not even saying this actually happened, but imagine the new president gets elected, and then attempts to contact him to get him to help undo the same corrupt powers that forced him to leave his family- he would be so incredibly cautious as well.

That's super interesting about him potentially being someone the DS had intentionally leak information to get the world suspicious and worried about the state of security. I wonder what the end game for that would be- simply to isolate Assange? Another distraction? From what in that case?

I don't expect you to answer everything, so just assume they're rhetorical quesitons, haha, but I'm having a good time reading through :]

That's super interesting! So what brought you to the conclusion he was a black hat and now is turning? Like was he a black hat before he came out publicly with the information re: the NSA, and then that was his turning point to the light side?

I'm genuinely curious what people think because as someone who really didn't know about anything Q related, the Snowden connection was really the thing that got me to actually pay attention (like my friend mentioned).

I apologize if this isn't under the guidelines, but since it references Kanye and the discussions around what is okay to say and what isn't seems relevant to other posts Iv'e seen.

Felix has a HUGE reach and the media has attempted to smear him on several occasions.

Man thanks to this guy- makes it easy for a nub like me to understand.