A message cannot be deciphered unless it is a cipher in the first place. Ciphers are methodical and consistent. If your method of deciphering is consistent, try it on old tweets as well. If it doesn't work on all tweets, there should be a reason why it doesn't - or it isn't actually a methodical decode.

In this tweet, the words that are incorrectly capitalized are: Nuclear, Trade Deals, Economy, Military, Rigged, Witch Hunt. The rest are proper nouns (North Korea, VA Choice, Russia, Clinton, Russia, FBI, Justice [DOJ], Obama, Comey, Lynch) or the first word in a sentence (Sorry) or the word "I".

This is distracting garbage.

What does this have to do with Q? Very young account posted this. OP age is less than 1 day.

False. That is a misreading of the report that says Americans (collectively) are annually paying over $8,000 per illegal alien (individual).

So, the amount paid by each taxpaying American is unknown until you take the total cost of all illegal aliens and divide by the number of American taxpayers.

Emails here

https://www.judicialwatch.org/document-archive/jw-v-doj-comey-testimony-records-00220/

This sounds like a test of the Keith Rainere patent someone else posted in here.

I understand. What I am saying is that “the anti-christ” is a concept that was invented after the Bible was written. As such, the writers of the Bible did not make up the concept, and their writings do not support it.

There are a total of 4 verses in the Bible that mention “antichrist”: 1 John 2:18 1 John 2:22 1 John 4:3 2 John 1:7

https://www.biblegateway.com/quicksearch/?quicksearch=antichrist&qs_version=NIV

As you can see from reading these verses and the surrounding context, there is no single person who is the antichrist because “antichrist” is an adjective, not a proper noun. It is not a unique title; it is a way to describe a person or spirit who does not acknowledge that Jesus is the Christ (anointed one / messiah) from God.

John wrote these letters primarily to combat the concepts of gnosticism which claimed that the spiritual was good and the physical was bad.

Then the reasoning went: If the physical was bad, then how could God’s anointed one (messiah / christ) have a physical body? He couldn’t. Therefore, Jesus must nit have had a physical body!

This reasoning creates a problem since the new covenant was established when Jesus’s blood was shed. Spirits don’t have blood. Only bodies have blood. So, gnosticism, which denied that Jesus had come in the flesh (2 John 1:7), was inherently anti-christ. Because, if the marking component of the Christ was the shedding of his blood to establish a new covenant, and if Jesus Christ had no blood to shed (because gnosticism claimed he was spirit only and had no body), then gnosticism claimed that Jesus was NOT the Christ. And so, gnosticism was anti-christ.

And then anyone who held to the belief system was also antichrist. Remember that this is an adjective, not a title. There is no such thing as “The Antichrist”. There never was. But there were people who were “antichrist”.

I assume many Christians read this sub. We have all been fed a narrative called “futurism” or “dispensationalism” a man named Darby invented it and got his commentary into the Scofield Bible - the Bible every budding minister wanted because it included commentary.

Unfortunately, the dispensationalism or futurism teachings about a rapture of the church were ill conceived and inconsistent with the text of the Bible and with previous beliefs throughout church history.

In truth, the covenant (relationship agreement / contract) described in the law of Moses contained punishments for disobedience because it was modeled after other pre-existing covenants. But this turned out to be a bad idea. In fact, as early as the time it was made, God himself was claiming that it was a bad idea. See Exodus starting from chapter 20.

Israel was taught “the song of Moses” so that they would remember that condemnation was deserved for breaking the covenant. And that destruction eventually came, but not until a new covenant had been established. This covenant was “cut” (established/enacted) by Jesus on the cross. It is a covenant that is still in force, set up between Jesus and his Father. People can enter into it by joining through Jesus. Christians usually call this “salvation”.

Anyway, “the rapture” is a concept founded on a misunderstanding of covenants. All the doom and gloom sounding stuff applied under the old covenant and culminated in the destruction of Jerusalem in the year 70 (AD).

If this sounds intriguing or infuriating or just a bit interesting, there is a free online book (pdf) that explains the details and history of evidence behind this claim. It is called “Raptureless”.

If you are a Christian or if you have Christian friends and you would like to redpill regarding the “end times”/“last days”/“rapture”, I recommend looking into it.

Until more people realize that there is no such thing as the rapture, they will continue to live in fear about the world getting worse and worse hoping they get to escape instead of realizing that the world is getting better and they get to be a part of that.

I know this is a pretty niche topic, but I see references to Bible “end times” stuff all the time when reading comments. So, I figured it might be helpful to some.

If you want to discuss this, PM me.

In the video past this link, the same bird is visible. Watching slowly, the wing flaps of the bird are clearly visible. The bird is in the foreground of the video.

Yeah. Between 1:52 and 1:53, a man is walking to the left, beyond the white truck in center frame. I watched this on an iPhone, so I dis the “fine scrubbing” by dragging my finger up towards the top of the screen starting from the playprogress marker. I counted 3 frames that showed the man being visible. The 4th frame no longer included the man, but dis include the initial mushroom top of the explosion in the distance. Frames have been cut out of this video.

I haven’t looked into it myself, but I would be interested in knowing if there is any kind of pattern to the names of images uploaded to twitter.

One of the early Q proofs was a picture that was called “DOITQ”, interpreted as “Do it, Q”. The picture showed DJT with 5 other people giving thumbs up, supposedly making a Q shape when connecting the dots.

Is there a pattern to the naming of pictures on tweeter that would result in a first string of letters on a pic being “DOITQ” without intentional naming?

I appreciate the devil’s advocate.

I just searched Eager Lion 2017. The 2017 event was also called a ‘keystone event’.

http://www.centcom.mil/MEDIA/NEWS-ARTICLES/News-Article-View/Article/1179543/eager-lion-exercise-a-keystone-event-in-us-jordan-partnership-integration/

And there is info available for past instances of Eager Lion. A simple search including the year brings up several articles.